Literature DB >> 30392926

Coronary computed tomographic imaging in women: An expert consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Quynh A Truong1, Sarah Rinehart2, Suhny Abbara3, Stephan Achenbach4, Daniel S Berman5, Renee Bullock-Palmer6, Patricia Carrascosa7, Kavitha M Chinnaiyan8, Damini Dey5, Maros Ferencik9, Gudrun Fuechtner10, Harvey Hecht11, Jill E Jacobs12, Sang-Eun Lee13, Jonathan Leipsic14, Fay Lin15, Aloha Meave16, Francesca Pugliese17, Lilia M Sierra-Galán18, Michelle C Williams19, Todd C Villines20, Leslee J Shaw15.   

Abstract

This expert consensus statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) provides an evidence synthesis on the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging for diagnosis and risk stratification of coronary artery disease in women. From large patient and population cohorts of asymptomatic women, detection of any coronary artery calcium that identifies females with a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk of >7.5% may more effectively triage women who may benefit from pharmacologic therapy. In addition to accurate detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), CT angiography (CTA) identifies nonobstructive atherosclerotic plaque extent and composition which is otherwise not detected by alternative stress testing modalities. Moreover, CTA has superior risk stratification when compared to stress testing in symptomatic women with stable chest pain (or equivalent) symptoms. For the evaluation of symptomatic women both in the emergency department and the outpatient setting, there is abundant evidence from large observational registries and multi-center randomized trials, that CT imaging is an effective procedure. Although radiation doses are far less for CT when compared to nuclear imaging, radiation dose reduction strategies should be applied in all women undergoing CT imaging. Effective and appropriate use of CT imaging can provide the means for improved detection of at-risk women and thereby focus preventive management resulting in long-term risk reduction and improved clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerosis; Coronary CTA; Sex differences; Suspected coronary disease

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30392926     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  11 in total

1.  Beyond equality, women require extra care in cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Samia Massalha; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Imaging of heart disease in women: review and case presentation.

Authors:  Nidaa Mikail; Alexia Rossi; Susan Bengs; Ahmed Haider; Barbara E Stähli; Angela Portmann; Alessio Imperiale; Valerie Treyer; Alexander Meisel; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Michael Messerli; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel; Cathérine Gebhard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  The evolving role of coronary computed tomography in understanding sex differences in coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Keva Garg; Toral R Patel; Arjun Kanwal; Todd C Villines; Niti R Aggarwal; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael J Blaha; Pamela S Douglas; Leslee J Shaw; Garima Sharma
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2021-10-08

Review 4.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Enhancing Risk Stratification and Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease in Women.

Authors:  Sara Karnib; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-10-04

Review 5.  Coronary artery calcium scoring in individuals at risk for coronary artery disease: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marleen Vonder; Carlijn M van der Aalst; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Psychosocial job exposure and risk of coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  Helena Eriksson; Kjell Torén; Annika Rosengren; Eva Andersson; Mia Söderberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Sex-Specific Plaque Signature: Uniqueness of Atherosclerosis in Women.

Authors:  Anum Minhas; Ilton Cubero Salazar; Brigitte Kazzi; Allison G Hays; Andrew D Choi; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Erin D Michos
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.955

8.  Cardiovascular imaging of women and men visiting the outpatient clinic with chest pain or discomfort: design and rationale of the ARGUS Study.

Authors:  Floor Groepenhoff; Anouk L M Eikendal; Sophie Heleen Bots; Anne-Mar van Ommen; L M Overmars; Daniek Kapteijn; Gerard Pasterkamp; Johan H C Reiber; David Hautemann; Roxana Menken; Marianne E Wittekoek; Leonard Hofstra; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Saskia Haitjema; Imo Hoefer; Tim Leiner; Hester M den Ruijter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Highlights of the 15th annual scientific meeting of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Kelley Branch; Maros Ferencik; Ron Blankstein; Andrew D Choi; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Purvi Parwani; Edward Nicol; Koen Nieman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2020-10-01

Review 10.  Managing Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Role of a Women's Heart Center.

Authors:  Abha Khandelwal; May Bakir; Meghan Bezaire; Briana Costello; Joanne Michelle D Gomez; Valerie Hoover; Noreen T Nazir; Katherine Nichols; Amy Reisenberg; Anupama Rao; Rupa Sanghani; Melissa Tracy; Annabelle Santos Volgman
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.