Literature DB >> 30390698

Risk factors predicting prognosis and outcome of elderly patients with isolated traumatic brain injury.

Roman C Ostermann1,2, Julian Joestl3, Thomas M Tiefenboeck3, Nikolaus Lang3, Patrick Platzer3,4, Marcus Hofbauer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI), particularly in the elderly patient population, is known to be the single largest cause of death and disability worldwide. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinical factors predicting poor outcome with special emphasis on the impact of respiratory failure (RF) on mortality in elderly patients with isolated severe TBI.
METHODS: All elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) with isolated severe head injury, admitted to this level I trauma center, during a period of 18 years (from January 1992 to December 2010) were identified from the trauma registry. The medical records were reviewed for demographics, mechanism of injury (MOI), GCS score at admission, RF, pupillary light reflex (LR), CT findings (subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hematoma, edema, midline-shift), and whether there was conservative treatment or surgical intervention and the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at hospital discharge. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for a poor prognosis and outcome.
RESULTS: The following variables influenced the mortality: respiratory failure, pupillary response, and the injury severity score (ISS). A significant increased risk of death was also found for patients with a midline shift of over 15 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study predicts a strong correlation between respiratory failure, pathological pupillary response, a higher ISS, and substantial midline shift with poor outcomes in elderly patients sustaining an isolated severe TBI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials: ID: NCT02386865 . Registered 12 March 2015-retrospectively registered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly patients; Isolated severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI); Outcome prediction; Respiratory failure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30390698      PMCID: PMC6215630          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0975-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), particularly in the elderly patient population (age ≥ 65 years of age), is known to be the single largest cause of death and disability worldwide [1, 2]. Considering the rise in life expectancy and the availability of advanced and more effective treatments for chronic diseases, TBI, resulting in approximately 66,000 deaths annually in Europe [3], is a growing serious public health concern. While TBI is less common in the elderly patient population, their impact and severity contributes significantly to long-term morbidity and mortality. The reason for the increased mortality in this age population compared to younger adults was pointed out in previous studies. Reasons like co-morbidities, reduced physical reserves, and histories of polypharmacia as factors influencing the outcome were reported [4-8]. The length of hospital stay and subsequent need for rehabilitation following severe TBI are significantly higher in elderly patients, thus highlighting the increased morbidity and costs for managing this patient group [2]. Therefore, early patient characteristics at the emergency department (ED) such as hemodynamic parameters and pupillary response, which potentially predict good or poor outcome following TBI, are becoming invaluable for clinical decision-making, family counseling, evaluation of quality of treatment, and medical resource allocation. Although several valuable studies and prognostic models for outcome prediction [2, 9] are primarily focusing on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and computed tomography (CT) results exist, and to date, no study is available describing the potential impact of respiratory failure (RF) and secondary neurological decline during ED management on mortality and outcome in the elderly patient population with isolated severe TBI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors for poor outcome and especially to investigate the role of RF that occurred during ED treatment on mortality in elderly patients with isolated severe TBI. Our hypothesis was that patients, who sustained RF and neurological decline during ED treatment for isolated severe TBI, would show a higher mortality and poor outcome compared to patients, who did not present with these symptoms. We consider this specific information to be essential to physicians requiring early decision making aids at the ED to determine which elderly patient with isolated severe TBI would most likely benefit from aggressive surgical intervention or immediate care unit (ICU) treatment.

Material and methods

The study was approved by our institutional review board and has been registered in a publicly accessible registry (clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02386865).

Patient population

All adult patients with isolated severe TBI, admitted to this level I trauma center, during a period of 18 years (from January 1992 to December 2010) were identified from the prospectively gathered trauma registry. The inclusion criteria for this study were (1) patients aged 65 years and older and (2) acute severe TBI defined by an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS-head) score of ≥ 3 for the head region. Exclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) oral intubation prior to ED admission, (2) no details of the time of injury (e.g., chronic subdural hematomas), and (3) any concomitant injuries. Patients who received oral intubation prior to ED admission were excluded due to the high variability of indications other than RF or secondary neurological decline (e.g., oral intubation required for aspiration protection) that may not be necessarily related to TBI-induced secondary RF. The medical records of all patients who met the inclusion criteria were reviewed for age, sex, mechanism of injury (MOI), GCS score at admission, RF, pupillary light reflex (LR), CT-findings (subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hematoma, edema, midline-shift), and whether there was conservative treatment or surgical intervention and the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at hospital discharge.

ED management

At ED admission, all patients were evaluated by an in-house trauma team, staffed by two trauma surgeons, two anesthesiologists, and two emergency nurses. All patients received the same standardized treatment protocol, according to the Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines [10]. Acute RF was defined as a life-threatening condition, characterized by (1) objective signs of irregular breathing patterns (extreme dyspnea, shortness of breath, or difficult breathing) and (2) a PaO2 value of less than 60 mmHg while breathing air, or a PaCO2 of more than 50 mmHg that required mechanical ventilation. Medical management was provided according to the Guidelines for Management of Severe Head Injury. The control of the cerebral perfusion pressure included oxygenation (fraction of inspired O2 40–100%), head elevation, fluid resuscitation, sedatives (short-acting benzodiazepines, e.g., midazolam (1–2 mg/h), or narcotics, e.g., fentanyl (25–100 μg/h, mild hyperventilation (PCO2 30–33 mm HG), and osmotherapy (0.25 g/kg mannitol every 4–6 h) or hypertonic saline (3% boluses of 250 to 500 ml) up to a serum osmolality of 320 mOsm/kg H20. All patients received a CT scan evaluation, and the scan was repeated 6 and 24 h after injury, as well as immediately after surgical intervention.

Clinical outcome

Clinical outcome at the time of hospital discharge was assessed using the GOS as described by Jennet et al. [11]. The GOS measures global functioning as a combination of neurological functioning and dependence on others with five outcome categories: (1) death, (2) persistent vegetative state, (3) severe disability (conscious but dependent on others for daily activities), (4) moderate disability (disabled but independent in daily activities), and (5) good recovery (normal life resumed, with minor neurological deficits possible).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated in order to get an overview of the data. To analyze the impact of several risk factors on the occurrence of the event (dead: NO vs. YES), the first univariate analyses (chi-square tests, Fisher exact tests, t tests, Wilcoxon tests) were performed. A stepwise logistic regression was done for the occurrence of the event accounting for all univariate significant parameters. Calculated statistical significance (p value) is reported. According to the univariate tests, the risk factors respiratory failure, subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hematoma, edema, pupils, midline shift as well as age, GCS, AIS-head, and ISS were selected for the stepwise logistic regression. All analyses were done using the SAS 9.1 System.

Results

During the 16-year period, 596 elderly patients were admitted with the diagnosis of isolated severe TBI to this level I trauma center. Of this cohort, 96 patients received oral intubation prior to ED-admission, 67 patients had oral intubation following ED-arrival for elective surgical interventions of associated injuries, and 106 patients sustained isolated concomitant injuries, which were treated non-operatively. Twenty-eight patients arrived with multiple injuries, and seven patients were lost to follow-up. These patients were excluded, leaving 292 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There were 126 (43.2%) males and 166 (56.8%) females with a mean age of 80.8 years (range, 65.3 to 99.4 years). Patient’s demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Alcohol consumption and anticoagulants showed no significant influence on mortality, with (p = 0.686) and (p = 0.059), respectively. The tested variables, RF, patients’ age, pupillary LR, AIS, ISS, and the GCS score at admission were all significantly associated with mortality (p < 0.05). Detailed information concerning initial CT findings is depicted in Table 2. Due to the obvious lack of correlation between outcome and sex, injury mechanism, transportation method, alcohol, and anticoagulants, these factors were excluded as candidate variables for further analysis by stepwise logistic regression.
Table 1

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics at admission

VariablesSurvivedN = 215 (%)DeathN = 77 (%)p value
Male89 (70.6)37 (29.4)
Female126 (75.9)40 (24.1)0.3116
Age179.8 (8.7)83.4 (7.7)0.0015
GCS score at the ED214.1 (3–15)10.9 (3–15)< 0.0001
AIS-head13.39 (0.58)4.39 (0.71)< 0.0001
ISS111.8 (4.8)19.8 (5.9)< 0.0001

GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS Injury Severity Score, AIS Abbreviated Injury Scale

1Mean (SD)

2Median (range)

Table 2

Incidence of CT abnormalities on initial head CT

CT characteristicsSurvivedn = 215 (%)Deathn = 77 (%)p value
SDH0.0230
 Yes46 (32.4)96 (67.6)
 No31 (20.7)119 (79.3)
EDH0.9005
 Yes9 (27.3)24 (72.7)
 No68 (26.3)191 (73.6)
SAH0.007
 Yes38 (35.5)69 (64.5)
 No39 (21.1)146 (78.9)
Hemorrhagic contusion0.1550
 Yes47 (29.7)111 (70.3)
 No30 (22.4)104 (77.6)
Edema< 0.0001
 Yes26 (57.8)19 (42.2)
 No30 (22.4)104 (77.6)
Midline shift< 0.0001
 No22 (10.1)197 (89.9)
 < 0.5 cm5 (50)5 (50)
 0.5–1.5 cm31 (72.1)12 (27.9)
 > 1.5 cm19 (95)1 (5)
Basal cisterns< 0.0001
 Open36 (14.4)214 (85.6)
 Partial open20 (100)0
 Closed21 (100)0

SDH subdural hematoma, EDH epidural hematoma, SAH subarachnoid hematoma

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics at admission GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS Injury Severity Score, AIS Abbreviated Injury Scale 1Mean (SD) 2Median (range) Incidence of CT abnormalities on initial head CT SDH subdural hematoma, EDH epidural hematoma, SAH subarachnoid hematoma According to the univariate tests, the risk factors RF, subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hematoma, edema, pupillary LR, midline shift as well as age, GCS score, AIS, and ISS were selected for stepwise logistic regression. The variable “basal cisterns” was not included in the logistic regression due to a 100% mortality rate for patients being affected by this factor. Finally, the logistic regression analysis found a significant influence of respiratory failure (p = 0.0005) on the mortality rate (Table 3). An odds ratio of 9.396 (95%, CI 2.657–33.220) indicates that patients sustaining RF during early ED management had a significantly higher risk of death. Detailed information of patients with RF is presented in Table 4. Furthermore, a significantly higher risk of mortality was found in patients with pathological pupillary LR and a higher ISS as shown in Table 3. A significantly greater risk of death was also found in patients presenting with midline shifts greater than 15 mm as compared to patients who showed no midline shift (p < 0.0001). The additional risk factors, initially significant in the univariate analysis did not prove to be significant in the multiple models. The incidence of major CT pathologies is shown in Table 2. A subarachnoid hemorrhage or contusion was found in 265 (90%) patients, and midline shifts in 73 (25%) patients. The midline shift, edema, subdural hematoma and basal cistern injuries were significantly associated with poor outcome (p < 0.05).
Table 3

Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis

Variablesp valueOR95% CI
Respiratory failure0.00059.3962.657–33.220
Pupillary reaction0.02123.3931.200–9.594
ISS< 0.00011.1791.098–1.267

OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, ISS Injury Severity Score

Table 4

Characteristics of patients with respiratory failure

VariablesRespiratory stablen = 270 (%)Respiratory unstablen = 29 (%)p value
Mortality54 (20.5)23 (79.3)< 0.0001
Age181 (8.7)78 (7.9)n.s
GCS score at the ED213.6 (3–15)10.2 (3–15)< 0.0001
AIS-head13.6 (0.7)4.3 (0.8)< 0.0001
ISS113.3 (5.7)19.2 (6.3)< 0.0001

GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS Injury Severity Score, AIS Abbreviated Injury Scale, n.s not significant

1Mean (SD)

2Median (range)

Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, ISS Injury Severity Score Characteristics of patients with respiratory failure GCS Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS Injury Severity Score, AIS Abbreviated Injury Scale, n.s not significant 1Mean (SD) 2Median (range) Two hundred forty-one patients were treated non-operatively with a mortality rate of 12.4% (30 patients) while 42 patients merely underwent palliative treatment due to their hopeless situation. A total of nine patients underwent neurosurgical treatment. Seven craniotomies and two hole trepanations were performed with a mortality rate of 71% (five patients) and 50% (one patient), respectively. The functional outcome, measured by the GOS at the time of hospital discharge revealed 77 (26.4%) patients who died, 18 patients (6.2%) in a persistent vegetative state, 32 (11%) with severe disability, 24 (8.2%) with a moderate disability, and 141 (48.3%) with a good recovery at discharge.

Discussion

Due to associated co-morbidity factors, pre-existing polypharmacia and reduced physical reserves, elderly patients (age over 65 years) sustaining isolate severe TBI have been reported to expect increased mortality rates and poor neurological recovery compared to their younger counterparts [2, 5, 6, 8]. With the increase of life expectancy, improved health services and more active lifestyles, TBI, especially in the elderly population, is a significant public health problem of growing importance. Beside the goal to survive the initial trauma, the “gold” measure of outcome following severe TBI should primarily consider the functional status of post-rehabilitation patients, as survival, often in a permanent vegetative state or unable to be independent in daily life, is an enormous emotional and financial burden to the rehabilitation staff as well as families. The decision, to which patient may benefit from early aggressive and maximal surgical treatment e.g. Decompressive Craniotomy (DC) remains controversial in the current literature [12, 13]. Although several studies and models for outcome prediction exist, no studies are available describing the impact of RF during ED management on mortality and outcome in elderly patients with severe TBI. The purpose of this cohort study was to evaluate predictive factors for poor outcome and to investigate the role of acute RF during treatment on mortality of elderly patients with isolated severe TBI. It is recognized that advanced age is one of the main prognostic factors and has a significant influence on mortality after TBI [2, 8]. A meta-analysis of four prospective series of patients with severe TBI reported that only 15% of elderly patients (age > 65 years) had a favorable outcome at 6 months post-rehabilitation [14]. Kilaru et al. [4] showed in their retrospective study of elderly patients with TBI an overall survival rate of 27%, after an average of 38 months post-rehabilitation. Pompucci et al. [15], in a series of 55 patients, showed advanced age as an independent predictive factor for worse outcome (p = 0.005) in patients older than 65 years. According the Indications Guidelines of Guerra et al. [12], DC should only be performed in patients under the age of 50 years. However, the reason for poor functional outcome remains multifactorial. The higher incidence of chronic concomitant diseases (e.g., stroke, cancer, coronary artery disease) and their respective needs for medication such as anticoagulants are very likely contributing factors [16]. Furthermore, the aging brain seems to be more sensitive to ischemia, [17] and offers an impaired regenerative capacity [18]. Additionally, several studies have shown a low-admission GCS, especially in elderly patients, associated with significantly higher mortality rates and poor outcome [2, 4]. Cagetti et al. [10] reported a 100% mortality rate in elderly patients (aged > 80 years), with a GCS score of 11 or less. Mitra et al. [19] showed a poor outcome, e.g., death or persistent vegetative state at a GCS score of 3 to 5 in 100%, at a score of 6 to 7 in 67%, and at a score of 8 in 20%. After the first univariate analyses, our results also revealed the GCS as a strong predictive factor of mortality. Patients who survived had a significantly (p < 0.0001) higher GCS score at admission compared to those who died. However, treatment discussions regarding aggressive management or palliative care cannot be solely based on the admission’s GCS score. The GCS is known to be affected by numerous factors unrelated to TBI, such as hypotension, hypoxia, alcohol or drug intoxication, and medical sedation or paralysis [2]. In contrast, the AIS-head classification can provide some guidelines to be used for decision-making. A higher AIS-head score is associated with an increased mortality. Although several prognostic models have been developed to predict outcome for patients with severe TBI, actually, the impact of RF on mortality in these patients is scarce in the current literature. Acute RF, in the context of TBI, is a life-threatening condition resulting from the secondary impact directly to the head injury. The bleeding and consecutive swelling of the brain can cause an increased intracranial pressure, thus, in the absence of acute medical care, ultimately leads to an incarceration of the respiratory center of the brainstem. Therefore, we find the RF constituting the final syndrome of distinct brain swelling and beginning of incarceration to be an exceptionally important and convincing parameter for the prediction of outcome in elderly patients with TBI. Our logistic regression analysis found a significant (p < 0.0005) influence of RF on the mortality rate. Of 29 elderly patients with isolated TBI and RF, 23 (79.3%) died during ED management. This patient population also showed a significant higher ISS and lower GCS compared to respiratory stable patients. Previous reports regarding the evaluation and scoring of CT scanning, determining the severity of TBI, found the presence of midline shift to be associated with unfavorable outcomes [20-22]. Jacobs et al. [23] found the limit to be 15 mm before death and poor outcome followed. Nelson et al. [24], in their extended analysis of 861 TBI patients, found the midline shift as the most important parameter for prediction of favorable or unfavorable outcome. Consistent with those findings, our study showed a significant (p < 0.0001) higher risk of death for patients with a midline shift > 15 mm compared to patients without a midline shift. Although survival following trauma is the immediate goal, more emphasis should be placed on the quality of life for the survivors. Kilaru et al. [4], in their retrospective study of severe TBI, n = 40 elderly patients (age > 65 years) found a survival rate of 27% at a mean follow-up of 38 months. Again, the admission GCS score and neurological deficits were strong predicting factors for mortality. In the low GCS (3 to 8) range, the probability of death or vegetative state was 100% at a GCS score of 3 to 5, 67% at a score of 6 to 7, and 20% at a score of 8. In a meta-analysis of four prospective studies of 5600 patients with severe traumatic brain injury, Hukkelhoven et al. [14] reported only 15% of elderly patients (age > 64 years) had a favorable outcome after 6 months. In our group of elderly patients, which incurred tube intubation due to RF secondary to neurological worsening, only 3 (7.3%) patients were discharged with an assessment of good recovery while 204 (88.8%) patients without RF declined to achieve the same. The main strength of this study is the relatively large number of included patients and the fact that all patients were treated by practically the same trauma staff at the level I trauma center of central Europe’s biggest hospital. The retrospective design of the study and the fact that no long-term home stay evaluation of the clinical outcome was performed, however, represent the most apparent limitations.

Conclusion

The current study shows an association between RF, pathological pupillary LR, a higher ISS and degree of midline shift with poor outcomes in elderly patients, and isolated severe TBI. Particularly, the reduction of RF appears to be a solid indicator for mortality and should be considered when assessing elderly patients with isolated TBI. However, the necessity for further research regarding prognostic factors following TBI in elderly patients is essential as the average age of our population, the current environment of cost reduction, and the numbers of elderly patients affected by TBI all continue to advance.
  24 in total

1.  The outcome from acute subdural and epidural intracranial haematomas in very elderly patients.

Authors:  B Cagetti; M Cossu; A Pau; C Rivano; G Viale
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Prediction tree for severely head-injured patients.

Authors:  S C Choi; J P Muizelaar; T Y Barnes; A Marmarou; D M Brooks; H F Young
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Elderly patients with severe head injury in coma from the outset--has anything changed?

Authors:  S Ushewokunze; R Nannapaneni; B A Gregson; L Stobbart; I R Chambers; A D Mendelow
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas; Ewout W Steyerberg; Isabella Butcher; Ruben Dammers; Juan Lu; Anthony Marmarou; Nino A Mushkudiani; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Long-term functional status and mortality of elderly patients with severe closed head injuries.

Authors:  S Kilaru; J Garb; T Emhoff; V Fiallo; B Simon; T Swiencicki; K F Lee
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1996-12

6.  Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Dale C Hesdorffer; Edward S Ahn; Carla Aresco; Thomas M Scalea; Howard M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Extended analysis of early computed tomography scans of traumatic brain injured patients and relations to outcome.

Authors:  David W Nelson; Harriet Nyström; Robert M MacCallum; Björn Thornquist; Anders Lilja; Bo-Michael Bellander; Anders Rudehill; Michael Wanecek; Eddie Weitzberg
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Recent trends in hospitalization and in-hospital mortality associated with traumatic brain injury in Canada: A nationwide, population-based study.

Authors:  Terence S Fu; Rowan Jing; Steven R McFaull; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.313

9.  Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities.

Authors:  Bram Jacobs; Tjemme Beems; Maja Stulemeijer; Arie B van Vugt; Ton M van der Vliet; George F Borm; Pieter E Vos
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  10 in total

1.  Predictors of Mortality, Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures, and Discharge Disposition in Octogenarians with Subdural Hematomas.

Authors:  Ahmed Kashkoush; Jordan C Petitt; Husayn Ladhani; Vanessa P Ho; Michael L Kelly
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Identification of Prognostic Factors in Surgically Treated Patients with Acute Epidural Hematoma.

Authors:  Koki Onodera; Tomoya Kamide; Tatsuki Kimura; Shinya Tabata; Toshiki Ikeda; Yuichiro Kikkawa; Hiroki Kurita
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-08-28

Review 3.  Traumatic Epidural and Subdural Hematoma: Epidemiology, Outcome, and Dating.

Authors:  Mariarosaria Aromatario; Alessandra Torsello; Stefano D'Errico; Giuseppe Bertozzi; Francesco Sessa; Luigi Cipolloni; Benedetta Baldari
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  The role of serum Dickkopf-1 in predicting 30-day death in severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Xin Ke; Ming Yang; Jin-Ming Luo; Yu Zhang; Xiao-Yu Chen
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults Presenting to the Emergency Department: Epidemiology, Outcomes and Risk Factors Predicting the Prognosis.

Authors:  Farhad Heydari; Mohammad Golban; Saeed Majidinejad
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-15

6.  Machine Learning Model for Predicting Acute Respiratory Failure in Individuals With Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Rui Na Ma; Yi Xuan He; Fu Ping Bai; Zhi Peng Song; Ming Sheng Chen; Min Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-24

7.  Factors with the strongest prognostic value associated with in-hospital mortality rate among patients operated for acute subdural and epidural hematoma.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Kulesza; Marek Mazurek; Adam Nogalski; Radosław Rola
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Prediction of Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage Progression and Neurologic Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Radiomics Score and Clinical Parameters.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Shih; Yan-Lin Liu; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chung-Han Ho; Cheng-Chun Yang; Tai-Yuan Chen; Te-Chang Wu; Ching-Chung Ko; Jonathan T Zhou; Yang Zhang; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-10

9.  Development and validation of a prediction nomogram for a 6-month unfavorable prognosis in traumatic brain-injured patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy: An observational study.

Authors:  Zhiji Tang; Kun Hu; Ruijin Yang; Mingang Zou; Ming Zhong; Qiangliang Huang; Wenjin Wei; Qiuhua Jiang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Secular Trend, Seasonal Variation, Epidemiological Pattern, and Outcome of Traumatic Head Injuries Due to Road Traffic Accidents in Aseer, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mubarak Ali Algahtany
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.