Literature DB >> 19698072

Extended analysis of early computed tomography scans of traumatic brain injured patients and relations to outcome.

David W Nelson1, Harriet Nyström, Robert M MacCallum, Björn Thornquist, Anders Lilja, Bo-Michael Bellander, Anders Rudehill, Michael Wanecek, Eddie Weitzberg.   

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is responsible for up to 45% of in-hospital trauma mortality. Computed tomography (CT) is central to acute TBI diagnostics, and millions of brain CT scans are conducted yearly worldwide. Though many studies have addressed individual predictors of outcome from findings on CT scans, few have done so from a multivariate perspective. As these parameters are interrelated in a complex manner, there is a need for a better understanding of them in this context. CT scans from 861 TBI patients were reviewed according to an extensive protocol. An extended analysis of CT parameters with respect to outcome was performed using linear and non-linear methods. We identified complex interactions and mutual information in many of the parameters. Variables predicting death differ from those predicting unfavorable versus favorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale scores of 1-3 versus 4-5 [GOS]). The most important parameter for prediction of unfavorable outcome is the magnitude of midline shift. In fact, this parameter, as a continuous variable, is by itself a better predictor and is better calibrated than the Marshall CT score, even for predicting death. In addition, hematoma volumes are nearly co-linear with midline shift and can be substituted for it. A score of traumatic subarachnoid/intraventricular blood components adds substantially to model calibration. A CT scoring system geared toward dichotomous GOS scores is suggested. CT parameters were found to add 6-10% additional estimated explained variance in the presence of the important clinical variables of age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and pupillary response. Finally we present a practical clinical "rule of thumb" to help predict the probability of unfavorable outcome using clinical and CT variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19698072     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.0986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  48 in total

1.  Quantitative CT improves outcome prediction in acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Esther L Yuh; Shelly R Cooper; Adam R Ferguson; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Motor vehicle crash-related subdural hematoma from real-world head impact data.

Authors:  Jillian E Urban; Christopher T Whitlow; Colston A Edgerton; Alexander K Powers; Joseph A Maldjian; Joel D Stitzel
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Outcome prediction in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a focus on computed tomography variables.

Authors:  Bram Jacobs; Tjemme Beems; Ton M van der Vliet; Arie B van Vugt; Cornelia Hoedemaekers; Janneke Horn; Gaby Franschman; Ian Haitsma; Joukje van der Naalt; Teuntje M J C Andriessen; George F Borm; Pieter E Vos
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  Hemorrhagic progression of a contusion after traumatic brain injury: a review.

Authors:  David Kurland; Caron Hong; Bizhan Aarabi; Volodymyr Gerzanich; J Marc Simard
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Neuroanatomical predictors of awakening in acutely comatose patients.

Authors:  Robert G Kowalski; Manuel M Buitrago; Josh Duckworth; Zachary D Chonka; H Adrian Puttgen; Robert D Stevens; Romergryko G Geocadin
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Outcome prediction within twelve hours after severe traumatic brain injury by quantitative cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  Paul Kaloostian; Claudia Robertson; Shankar P Gopinath; Martina Stippler; C Christopher King; Clifford Qualls; Howard Yonas; Edwin M Nemoto
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Automatic Quantification of Computed Tomography Features in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Saurabh Jain; Thijs Vande Vyvere; Vasilis Terzopoulos; Diana Maria Sima; Eloy Roura; Andrew Maas; Guido Wilms; Jan Verheyden
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Assessing bicycle-related trauma using the biomarker S100B reveals a correlation with total injury severity.

Authors:  E P Thelin; E Zibung; L Riddez; C Nordenvall
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Traumatic intracranial hematomas: prognostic value of contrast extravasation.

Authors:  L Letourneau-Guillon; T Huynh; R Jakobovic; R Milwid; S P Symons; R I Aviv
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Blood pressure regulation to prevent progression of blunt traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in stable patients.

Authors:  Nikolay Bugaev; Majid Al-Hazmi; McKaila Allcorn; Sandra Strack Arabian; Ron Riesenburger; Mina Safain; Shane Burke; Augustus Colangelo; Reuven Rabinovici
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.