Literature DB >> 20035619

Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities.

Bram Jacobs1, Tjemme Beems, Maja Stulemeijer, Arie B van Vugt, Ton M van der Vliet, George F Borm, Pieter E Vos.   

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common heterogeneous neurological disorder with a wide range of possible clinical outcomes. Accurate prediction of outcome is desirable for optimal treatment. This study aimed both to identify the demographic, clinical, and computed tomographic (CT) characteristics associated with unfavorable outcome at 6 months after mTBI, and to design a prediction model for application in daily practice. All consecutive mTBI patients (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score: 13-15) admitted to our hospital who were age 16 or older were included during an 8-year period as part of the prospective Radboud University Brain Injury Cohort Study (RUBICS). Outcome was assessed at 6 months post-trauma using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), dichotomized into unfavorable (GOSE score 1-6) and favorable (GOSE score 7-8) outcome groups. The predictive value of several variables was determined using multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. We included 2784 mTBI patients and found CT abnormalities in 20.7% of the 1999 patients that underwent a head CT. Age, extracranial injuries, and day-of-injury alcohol intoxication proved to be the strongest outcome predictors. The presence of facial fractures and the number of hemorrhagic contusions emerged as CT predictors. Furthermore, we showed that the predictive value of a scheme based on a modified Injury Severity Score (ISS), alcohol intoxication, and age equalled the value of one that also included CT characteristics. In fact, it exceeded one that was based on CT characteristics alone. We conclude that, although valuable for the identification of the individual mTBI patient at risk for deterioration and eventual neurosurgical intervention, CT characteristics are imperfect predictors of outcome after mTBI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20035619     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  53 in total

1.  Quantitative CT improves outcome prediction in acute traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Esther L Yuh; Shelly R Cooper; Adam R Ferguson; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  Symptoms of Concussion and Comorbid Disorders.

Authors:  Cherry Junn; Kathleen R Bell; Christian Shenouda; Jeanne M Hoffman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  A Review of the Effectiveness of Neuroimaging Modalities for the Detection of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Franck Amyot; David B Arciniegas; Michael P Brazaitis; Kenneth C Curley; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Amir Gandjbakhche; Peter Herscovitch; Sidney R Hinds; Geoffrey T Manley; Anthony Pacifico; Alexander Razumovsky; Jason Riley; Wanda Salzer; Robert Shih; James G Smirniotopoulos; Derek Stocker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Outcome prediction in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a focus on computed tomography variables.

Authors:  Bram Jacobs; Tjemme Beems; Ton M van der Vliet; Arie B van Vugt; Cornelia Hoedemaekers; Janneke Horn; Gaby Franschman; Ian Haitsma; Joukje van der Naalt; Teuntje M J C Andriessen; George F Borm; Pieter E Vos
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Outcome prediction after mild and complicated mild traumatic brain injury: external validation of existing models and identification of new predictors using the TRACK-TBI pilot study.

Authors:  Hester F Lingsma; John K Yue; Andrew I R Maas; Ewout W Steyerberg; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Intensive Care Unit Admission Patterns for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the USA.

Authors:  Robert H Bonow; Alex Quistberg; Frederick P Rivara; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Diffuse vascular injury: convergent-type hemorrhage in the supratentorial white matter on susceptibility-weighted image in cases of severe traumatic brain damage.

Authors:  Asami Iwamura; Toshiaki Taoka; Akio Fukusumi; Masahiko Sakamoto; Toshiteru Miyasaka; Tomoko Ochi; Toshiaki Akashi; Kazuo Okuchi; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Long-term consequences: effects on normal development profile after concussion.

Authors:  Daniel H Daneshvar; David O Riley; Christopher J Nowinski; Ann C McKee; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 1.784

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Esther L Yuh; Pratik Mukherjee; Hester F Lingsma; John K Yue; Adam R Ferguson; Wayne A Gordon; Alex B Valadka; David M Schnyer; David O Okonkwo; Andrew I R Maas; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Functional status after blast-plus-impact complex concussive traumatic brain injury in evacuated United States military personnel.

Authors:  Christine L MacDonald; Ann M Johnson; Elliot C Nelson; Nicole J Werner; Raymond Fang; Stephen F Flaherty; David L Brody
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.