| Literature DB >> 30390674 |
Mario Hidalgo-Ruiz1, Carlos E Suarez2, Miguel A Mercado-Uriostegui1, Ruben Hernandez-Ortiz3, Juan Alberto Ramos3, Edelmira Galindo-Velasco4, Gloria León-Ávila5, José Manuel Hernández6, Juan Mosqueda7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Babesia bovis belongs to the phylum Apicomplexa and is the major causal agent of bovine babesiosis, the most important veterinary disease transmitted by arthropods. In apicomplexan parasites, the interaction between AMA1 and RON2 is necessary for the invasion process, and it is a target for vaccine development. In B. bovis, the existence of AMA1 has already been reported; however, the presence of a homolog of RON2 is unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize RON2 in B. bovis.Entities:
Keywords: Babesia bovis; Bovine babesiosis; CLAG domain; Invasion process; Tight junction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30390674 PMCID: PMC6215676 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3164-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1B. bovis ron2 identification. a Synteny map for B. bovis and B. bigemina. b A representation of B. bovis RON2, including the signal peptide (SP) located from aa 1 to 19 in different strains of B. bovis and the CLAG domain that is located from aa 727 to 1168. Both are depicted as gray boxes. Shaded boxes represent the transmembrane regions and black boxes represent the sequences of the selected peptides
Babesia bovis ron2 designed primers
| Primer | Sequence (5'-3') |
|---|---|
| Fw0 RON2Bo | CACCTCACCGATATGCGTAC |
| RvI0 RON2Bo | GAGTCACTGACACCTTGCC |
| FwI0 RON2Bo | GTCAGTGACTCCCCTCTTCAAG |
| Rv0 RON2Bo | GGAATCACCGCCTAGTAGC |
| Fw1 RON2Bo | GCTACTAGGCGGTGATTCC |
| RvI1 RON2Bo | GCGTCAATAGAGATAAGCAGG |
| FwI1 RON2Bo | CCTGCTTATCTCTATTGACGC |
| Rv1 RON2Bo | CAACCCATTGCTTGATTCCC |
| Fw2 RON2Bo | GGGAATCAAGCAATGGGTTG |
| RvI2 RON2Bo | CTTTCTTAGCAATAGCGTCGG |
| FwI2 RON2Bo | CTTCGTTGCTGGAGGCTACATC |
| Rv2 RON2Bo | CGTTGGATATTCGGTTGAGC |
| Fw3 RON2Bo | GCTCAACCGAATATCCAACG |
| Rv3 RON2Bo | CCGTACTTGATTGCTCTGAG |
| Fw4 RON2Bo | CTCAGAGCAATCAAGTACGG |
| Rv4 RON2Bo | CACGGATGGCTATGACAATG |
Note: Eight pairs of primers were designed to get the amplification and sequencing of 4169 bp under the same PCR protocol
Fig. 2Transcription and expression analysis of B. bovis ron2. a Bioinformatics transcription analysis. The results on the y-axis are shown by robust multi-array average (RMA) normalized values (log2). The comparison of the expression level of ron2, ama-1 and sbp-tc9 (spherical body protein 2 truncated copy 9) genes between attenuated (white) and virulent (gray) strains is shown on the x-axis. b WB expression analysis of RON2. Lane 1: proteins of B. bovis iRBC incubated with post-immunization sera anti-RON2; Lane 2: proteins of B. bovis iRBC incubated with pre-immunization sera anti-RON2; Lane 3: proteins of nRBC incubated with post-immunization sera anti-RON2. The molecular weight marker is shown in kDa
Fig. 3Indirect immunofluorescence of B. bovis blood stages detected with antibodies against RON2. Smears of B. bovis-infected merozoites were incubated with bovine antiserum against P2 (a), P3 (c) or serum from naturally infected cattle (e). No signal was observed in the pre-immunization serum of cattle immunized with P2 (b), P3 (d) or cattle immunized only with adjuvant (f) used as the negative control. Scale-bars: 10 μm
Fig. 4Neutralization assay. The results on the y-axis are shown as percentages of the parasitemia inhibition. The evaluation of the inhibition generated by different antibodies is shown on the x-axis. Abbreviations: PC, positive control; AC, adjuvant control (PBS + ADJ); P1, anti-Peptide1 antibodies; P2, anti-Peptide2 antibodies; P3, anti-Peptide3 antibodies; P4, anti-Peptide4 antibodies; P2+P3, a mix of the anti-Peptide2 and anti-Peptide3 antibodies. There were significant differences between the pre- and post-immunization serum samples (*P < 0.05)
RON2 peptides are recognized by sera of naturally infected cattle
| State | Farm | Peptide 2 | Peptide 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | Positive | Negative | Total | ||
| Jalisco | A | 6 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 12 |
| B | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
| C | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Veracruz | A | 20 | 3 | 36 | 18 | 5 | 36 |
| B | 10 | 2 | 11 | 1 | |||
| C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
| Querétaro | A | 1 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
| C | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |||
| D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
| E | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |||
| F | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
| Guanajuato | A | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Chiapas | A | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| B | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | |||
| Chihuahua | A | 1 | 2 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 16 |
| B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
| C | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |||
| D | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
| E | 6 | 2 | 7 | 1 | |||
| Sinaloa | A | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
| C | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Total positive/negative | 75 | 15 | 79 | 11 | |||
Key: Positive, B. bovis positive serum samples that recognized the peptide; Negative, B. bovis positive serum samples that did not recognize the peptide