Literature DB >> 30385537

Predicting Pressure Injury in Critical Care Patients: A Machine-Learning Model.

Jenny Alderden1, Ginette Alyce Pepper2, Andrew Wilson2, Joanne D Whitney2, Stephanie Richardson2, Ryan Butcher2, Yeonjung Jo2, Mollie Rebecca Cummins2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a serious problem among critical care patients. Some can be prevented by using measures such as specialty beds, which are not feasible for every patient because of costs. However, decisions about which patient would benefit most from a specialty bed are difficult because results of existing tools to determine risk for pressure injury indicate that most critical care patients are at high risk.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for predicting development of pressure injuries among surgical critical care patients.
METHODS: Data from electronic health records were divided into training (67%) and testing (33%) data sets, and a model was developed by using a random forest algorithm via the R package "randomforest."
RESULTS: Among a sample of 6376 patients, hospital-acquired pressure injuries of stage 1 or greater (outcome variable 1) developed in 516 patients (8.1%) and injuries of stage 2 or greater (outcome variable 2) developed in 257 (4.0%). Random forest models were developed to predict stage 1 and greater and stage 2 and greater injuries by using the testing set to evaluate classifier performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for both models was 0.79.
CONCLUSION: This machine-learning approach differs from other available models because it does not require clinicians to input information into a tool (eg, the Braden Scale). Rather, it uses information readily available in electronic health records. Next steps include testing in an independent sample and then calibration to optimize specificity. ©2018 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30385537      PMCID: PMC6247790          DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2018525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  15 in total

1.  Application of the random forest classification algorithm to a SELDI-TOF proteomics study in the setting of a cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  Grant Izmirlian
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Factors associated with pressure ulcers in patients in a surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Gerri C Slowikowski; Marjorie Funk
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.741

3.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R.

Authors:  Tobias Sing; Oliver Sander; Niko Beerenwinkel; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Predictive power of the Braden scale for pressure sore risk in adult critical care patients: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Jill Cox
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.741

5.  Random Forest for automatic assessment of heart failure severity in a telemonitoring scenario.

Authors:  G Guidi; M C Pettenati; R Miniati; E Iadanza
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

6.  A conceptual schema for the study of the etiology of pressure sores.

Authors:  B Braden; N Bergstrom
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.625

7.  Multiple Imputation: A Flexible Tool for Handling Missing Data.

Authors:  Peng Li; Elizabeth A Stuart; David B Allison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Risk factors for pressure ulcer development in a best practice surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Heidi Frankel; Jason Sperry; Lewis Kaplan
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.

Authors:  Sookyung Hyun; Brenda Vermillion; Cheryl Newton; Monica Fall; Xiaobai Li; Pacharmon Kaewprag; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Elizabeth R Lenz
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Random forest methodology for model-based recursive partitioning: the mobForest package for R.

Authors:  Nikhil R Garge; Georgiy Bobashev; Barry Eggleston
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  27 in total

1.  The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Jie Song; Yuan Gao; Pengbin Yin; Yi Li; Yang Li; Jie Zhang; Qingqing Su; Xiaojie Fu; Hongying Pi
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-03-18

2.  Identification of Immune-Associated Genes in Diagnosing Aortic Valve Calcification With Metabolic Syndrome by Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Yufei Zhou; Wenxiang Shi; Di Zhao; Shengjue Xiao; Kai Wang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Machine Learning Approaches for Hospital Acquired Pressure Injuries: A Retrospective Study of Electronic Medical Records.

Authors:  Joshua J Levy; Jorge F Lima; Megan W Miller; Gary L Freed; A James O'Malley; Rebecca T Emeny
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence in dermatology and healthcare: An overview.

Authors:  Varadraj Vasant Pai; Rohini Bhat Pai
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2021 [SEASON]       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Predicting pressure injury using nursing assessment phenotypes and machine learning methods.

Authors:  Wenyu Song; Min-Jeoung Kang; Linying Zhang; Wonkyung Jung; Jiyoun Song; David W Bates; Patricia C Dykes
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Machine Learning-Based Pressure Ulcer Prediction in Modular Critical Care Data.

Authors:  Petr Šín; Alica Hokynková; Nováková Marie; Pokorná Andrea; Rostislav Krč; Jan Podroužek
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30

7.  Integrative Analysis of Biomarkers and Mechanisms in Adamantinomatous Craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Da Lin; Wenyue Zhao; Jun Yang; Hao Wang; Hongbing Zhang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury Development Among Surgical Critical Care Patients Admitted With Community-Acquired Pressure Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jenny Alderden; Mollie Cummins; Sunniva Zaratkiewicz; Yunchuan 'Lucy' Zhao; Kathryn Drake; Tracey L Yap
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

9.  Pressure Injuries in Critical Care Patients in US Hospitals: Results of the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey.

Authors:  Jill Cox; Laura E Edsberg; Kimberly Koloms; Catherine A VanGilder
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.970

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence Applications in Dermatology: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Arieh Gomolin; Elena Netchiporouk; Robert Gniadecki; Ivan V Litvinov
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.