Literature DB >> 15208191

Application of the random forest classification algorithm to a SELDI-TOF proteomics study in the setting of a cancer prevention trial.

Grant Izmirlian1.   

Abstract

A thorough discussion of the random forest (RF) algorithm as it relates to a SELDI-TOF proteomics study is presented, with special emphasis on its application for cancer prevention: specifically, what makes it an efficient, yet reliable classifier, and what makes it optimal among the many available approaches. The main body of the paper treats the particulars of how to successfully apply the RF algorithm in a proteomics profiling study to construct a classifier and discover peak intensities most likely responsible for the separation between the classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15208191     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1310.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  24 in total

Review 1.  Classification algorithms for phenotype prediction in genomics and proteomics.

Authors:  Habtom W Ressom; Rency S Varghese; Zhen Zhang; Jianhua Xuan; Robert Clarke
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Is bagging effective in the classification of small-sample genomic and proteomic data?

Authors:  T T Vu; U M Braga-Neto
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2009-04-16

3.  LC-MS Based Detection of Differential Protein Expression.

Authors:  Leepika Tuli; Habtom W Ressom
Journal:  J Proteomics Bioinform       Date:  2009-10-02

4.  Exposure assessment models for elemental components of particulate matter in an urban environment: A comparison of regression and random forest approaches.

Authors:  Cole Brokamp; Roman Jandarov; M B Rao; Grace LeMasters; Patrick Ryan
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Exploring the forest instead of the trees: An innovative method for defining obesogenic and obesoprotective environments.

Authors:  Claudia Nau; Hugh Ellis; Hongtai Huang; Brian S Schwartz; Annemarie Hirsch; Lisa Bailey-Davis; Amii M Kress; Jonathan Pollak; Thomas A Glass
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 6.  Proteomic analysis in multiple myeloma research.

Authors:  Jana Cumova; Anna Potacova; Zbynek Zdrahal; Roman Hajek
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  A comparison of methods for classifying clinical samples based on proteomics data: a case study for statistical and machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Dayle L Sampson; Tony J Parker; Zee Upton; Cameron P Hurst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  EM-random forest and new measures of variable importance for multi-locus quantitative trait linkage analysis.

Authors:  Sophia S F Lee; Lei Sun; Rafal Kustra; Shelley B Bull
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Proteomic analysis of amniotic fluid to identify women with preterm labor and intra-amniotic inflammation/infection: the use of a novel computational method to analyze mass spectrometric profiling.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Jimmy Espinoza; Wade T Rogers; Allan Moser; Jyh Kae Nien; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Francesca Gotsch; Offer Erez; Ricardo Gomez; Sam Edwin; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2008-06

10.  An introspective comparison of random forest-based classifiers for the analysis of cluster-correlated data by way of RF++.

Authors:  Yuliya V Karpievitch; Elizabeth G Hill; Anthony P Leclerc; Alan R Dabney; Jonas S Almeida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.