Wenyu Song1,2, Min-Jeoung Kang1,2, Linying Zhang3, Wonkyung Jung4, Jiyoun Song5, David W Bates1,2,6, Patricia C Dykes1,2,6. 1. Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. 4. School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 5. School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. 6. Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pressure injuries are common and serious complications for hospitalized patients. The pressure injury rate is an important patient safety metric and an indicator of the quality of nursing care. Timely and accurate prediction of pressure injury risk can significantly facilitate early prevention and treatment and avoid adverse outcomes. While many pressure injury risk assessment tools exist, most were developed before there was access to large clinical datasets and advanced statistical methods, limiting their accuracy. In this paper, we describe the development of machine learning-based predictive models, using phenotypes derived from nurse-entered direct patient assessment data. METHODS: We utilized rich electronic health record data, including full assessment records entered by nurses, from 5 different hospitals affiliated with a large integrated healthcare organization to develop machine learning-based prediction models for pressure injury. Five-fold cross-validation was conducted to evaluate model performance. RESULTS: Two pressure injury phenotypes were defined for model development: nonhospital acquired pressure injury (N = 4398) and hospital acquired pressure injury (N = 1767), representing 2 distinct clinical scenarios. A total of 28 clinical features were extracted and multiple machine learning predictive models were developed for both pressure injury phenotypes. The random forest model performed best and achieved an AUC of 0.92 and 0.94 in 2 test sets, respectively. The Glasgow coma scale, a nurse-entered level of consciousness measurement, was the most important feature for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This model accurately predicts pressure injury development and, if validated externally, may be helpful in widespread pressure injury prevention.
OBJECTIVE: Pressure injuries are common and serious complications for hospitalized patients. The pressure injury rate is an important patient safety metric and an indicator of the quality of nursing care. Timely and accurate prediction of pressure injury risk can significantly facilitate early prevention and treatment and avoid adverse outcomes. While many pressure injury risk assessment tools exist, most were developed before there was access to large clinical datasets and advanced statistical methods, limiting their accuracy. In this paper, we describe the development of machine learning-based predictive models, using phenotypes derived from nurse-entered direct patient assessment data. METHODS: We utilized rich electronic health record data, including full assessment records entered by nurses, from 5 different hospitals affiliated with a large integrated healthcare organization to develop machine learning-based prediction models for pressure injury. Five-fold cross-validation was conducted to evaluate model performance. RESULTS: Two pressure injury phenotypes were defined for model development: nonhospital acquired pressure injury (N = 4398) and hospital acquired pressure injury (N = 1767), representing 2 distinct clinical scenarios. A total of 28 clinical features were extracted and multiple machine learning predictive models were developed for both pressure injury phenotypes. The random forest model performed best and achieved an AUC of 0.92 and 0.94 in 2 test sets, respectively. The Glasgow coma scale, a nurse-entered level of consciousness measurement, was the most important feature for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This model accurately predicts pressure injury development and, if validated externally, may be helpful in widespread pressure injury prevention.
Authors: Sookyung Hyun; Brenda Vermillion; Cheryl Newton; Monica Fall; Xiaobai Li; Pacharmon Kaewprag; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Elizabeth R Lenz Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Susanne Coleman; Claudia Gorecki; E Andrea Nelson; S José Closs; Tom Defloor; Ruud Halfens; Amanda Farrin; Julia Brown; Lisette Schoonhoven; Jane Nixon Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Stephen D Milne; Ihab Seoudi; Hanadi Al Hamad; Talal K Talal; Anzila A Anoop; Niloofar Allahverdi; Zain Zakaria; Robert Menzies; Patricia Connolly Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Jenny Alderden; Susan M Kennerly; Andrew Wilson; Jonathan Dimas; Casey McFarland; David Y Yap; Lucy Zhao; Tracey L Yap Journal: Comput Inform Nurs Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 2.146