| Literature DB >> 30384464 |
José A Menezes-Filho1, Chrissie F Carvalho2, Juliana L G Rodrigues3, Cecília F S Araújo4, Nathália R Dos Santos5, Cássio S Lima6, Matheus J Bandeira7, Breno L de S Marques8, Ana Laura S Anjos9, Homegnon A F Bah10, Neander Abreu11, Alline Philibert12, Donna Mergler13.
Abstract
Studies have demonstrated that, for urban children, dust represents the main exposure to sources of metals like lead (Pb) and manganese (Mn). We aimed to investigate the exposure to these metals and their association with intellectual deficit in children living in an industrial region. This cross-sectional study recruited volunteers from four elementary schools in the town of Simões Filho, Brazil. We evaluated 225 school-aged children (7⁻12 years) for blood lead (PbB) and manganese hair (MnH) and toenails (MnTn) by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Child and maternal IQs were estimated using the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale for Intelligence (WASI). Median and range PbB were 1.2 (0.3⁻15.6) μg/dL. MnH and MnTn medians (ranges) were 0.74 (0.16⁻8.79) μg/g and 0.85 (0.15⁻13.30) μg/g, respectively. After adjusting for maternal IQ, age and Mn exposure, child IQ drops by 8.6 points for a 10-fold increase in PbB levels. Moreover, an effect modification of Mn co-exposure was observed. In children with low MnTn, association between Pb and child IQ was not significant (β = -6.780, p = 0.172). However, in those with high MnTn, the association was increased by 27.9% (β = -8.70, p = 0.036). Low Pb exposure is associated with intellectual deficit in children, especially in those with high MnTn.Entities:
Keywords: children; environmental contamination; intellectual function; lead; manganese
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30384464 PMCID: PMC6266231 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Schematic map of the study area, showing the location of the Mn alloy plant and the four elementary schools (A–D) attended by the study population.
Distribution of socio-demographic, characteristics, lifestyle and IQ of the children and parents or caregivers (n = 226).
| Characteristics |
| %/Mean (Min-Max) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Boys | 111 | 49.1% |
| Girls | 115 | 50.9% |
| Age (months) | 224 | 116.8 (84.0–156.9) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 211 | 17.62 (12.70–44.75) |
| H/A z-score | 212 | 0.065 (−3.03–3.93) |
| Anemia | 186 | 10 (5.5%) |
| Main caregiver | ||
| Mother | 148 | 83.6% |
| Father | 11 | 6.2% |
| Other | 18 | 10.2% |
| Gestational period in the region | 216 | 170 (75.2%) |
| Smoker at home | 215 | 39 (18.1%) |
| Maternal schooling | ||
| Completed high school | 215 | 50 (24.0%) |
| Less than high school | 208 | 158 (76.0%) |
| Brazilian socioeconomic classification | ||
| B | 5 | 2.4% |
| C | 93 | 41.2% |
| D/E | 155 | 52.8% |
| Children’s IQ | 217 | 75.5 (42–116) |
| Maternal IQ | 174 | 68.9 (43–108) |
Lead and manganese biomarker levels in school-aged children.
| Biomarker |
| Median | Min.–Max. | Mean | SD | P25–P75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PbB (µg/dL) | 219 | 1.15 | 0.2–15.6 | 1.64 | 1.56 | 0.6–2.1 |
| MnH (µg/g) | 208 | 0.74 | 0.16–8.79 | 1.14 | 1.19 | 0.50–1.32 |
| MnTn (µg/g) | 198 | 0.84 | 0.15–13.30 | 1.43 | 1.75 | 0.51–1.77 |
Spearman’s correlation matrix. Data are Spearman correlation coefficients (rho) and p-values.
| Children’s IQ | Maternal IQ | Sex | Age (months) | H/A z-Score | PbB (µg/dL) | MnH (µg/g) | MnTn (µg/g) | Hb (g/dL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.000 | 0.413 ** | 0.008 | −0.287 ** | 0.038 | −0.264 ** | −0.169 * | −0.018 | 0.110 |
| 0.000 | 0.906 | 0.000 | 0.591 | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.807 | 0.111 | ||
|
| 1.000 | 0.098 | −0.117 | 0.044 | −0.070 | −0.216 ** | 0.016 | 0.126 | |
| 0.198 | 0.128 | 0.567 | 0.367 | 0.006 | 0.846 | 0.102 | |||
|
| 1.000 | 0.007 | −0.021 | 0.088 | 0.099 | 0.122 | 0.020 | ||
| 0.917 | 0.760 | 0.193 | 0.153 | 0.087 | 0.766 | ||||
|
| 1.000 | −0.099 | 0.229 ** | 0.005 | 0.133 | −0.013 | |||
| 0.150 | 0.001 | 0.946 | 0.063 | 0.851 | |||||
|
| 1.000 | −0.164 * | −0.050 | 0.115 | −0.029 | ||||
| 0.019 | 0.490 | 0.117 | 0.677 | ||||||
|
| 1.000 | 0.185 ** | 0.244 ** | −0.178 ** | |||||
| 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.008 | |||||||
|
| 1.000 | 0.394 ** | −0.133 | ||||||
| 0.000 | 0.058 | ||||||||
|
| 1.000 | −0.164 * | |||||||
| 0.022 | |||||||||
|
| 1.000 |
** Correlation significant at 0.01 (bilateral) and * Correlation significant at 0.05 (bilateral).
Summary of the multiple linear regression models with children’s total IQ scores as a dependent variable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Constant | 98.118 | 6.334 | 15.492 | <0.001 |
| Age (months) | −0.195 | 0.053 | −3.659 | <0.001 |
| Sex | 0.958 | 1.910 | 0.501 | 0.617 |
| H/A z-score | −0.662 | 0.901 | −0.735 | 0.464 |
| LogPbB | −9.915 | 3.041 | −3.261 | 0.001 |
| LogMnH | −8.093 | 3.041 | −2.576 | 0.011 |
| LogMnTn | 6.961 | 2.935 | 2.372 | 0.019 |
| Models’ statistics: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Constant | 61.404 | 8.834 | 6.951 | <0.001 |
| Age (months) | −0.140 | 0.053 | −2.631 | 0.009 |
| LogPbB | −8.609 | 2.965 | −2.904 | 0.004 |
| LogMnH | −2.589 | 3.234 | −0.801 | 0.425 |
| LogMnTn | 4.372 | 2.854 | 1.523 | 0.128 |
| ParentMaternal IQ | 0.452 | 0.078 | 5.799 | <0.001 |
| Models’ statistics: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Constant | 59.016 | 8.899 | 6.632 | <0.001 |
| Age (months) | −0.131 | 0.054 | −2.420 | 0.017 |
| LogPbB | −9.008 | 3.121 | −2.288 | 0.005 |
| LogMnH | −0.279 | 3.121 | −0.089 | 0.929 |
| Maternal IQ | 0.473 | 0.079 | 5.961 | <0.001 |
| LogPbB*LogMnH | −14.317 | 10.868 | −1.317 | 0.190 |
| LogPbB*LogMnTn | 6.412 | 8.657 | 0.741 | 0.460 |
| Models’ statistics: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Constant | 54.282 | 12.450 | 4.360 | <0.001 |
| Age (months) | −0.050 | 0.083 | −0.610 | 0.544 |
| LogPbB | −6.801 | 4.927 | −1.380 | 0.172 |
| LogMnH | −5.329 | 4.675 | −1.140 | 0.258 |
| Maternal IQ | 0.383 | 0.106 | 3.632 | 0.001 |
| Models’ statistics: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Constant | 55.445 | 13.843 | 4.005 | <0.001 |
| Age (months) | −0.170 | 0.073 | −2.336 | 0.022 |
| LogPbB | −8.699 | 4.064 | −2.140 | 0.036 |
| LogMnH | 3.078 | 4.277 | 0.720 | 0.4474 |
| Maternal IQ | 0.598 | 0.124 | 4.812 | <0.001 |
| Models’ statistics: | ||||
Figure 2Scattered residual plots of the significant variables modeled explaining the variations in child IQ: parenteral IQ, children’s age and PbB levels.
Figure 3The effect modification of the low Mn (A) versus high Mn (B) exposure on the association of PbB levels on child IQ.