| Literature DB >> 34189342 |
Abstract
Cement plants located in urban areas can increase health risk. Although children are particularly vulnerable, biomonitoring studies are lacking. Toenail concentration of 24 metals was measured in 366 children (6-10 years), who live and attend school in a city hosting a cement plant. Living addresses and schools were geocoded and attributed to exposed or control areas, according to modeled ground concentrations of PM10 generated by the cement plant. Air levels of PM10 and NO2 were monitored. PM10 levels were higher in the exposed, than in the control area. The highest mean PM10 concentration was recorded close to the cement plant. Conversely, the highest NO2 concentration was in the control area, where vehicular traffic and home heating were the prevalent sources of pollutants. Exposed children had higher concentrations of Nickel (Ni), Cadmium (Cd), Mercury (Hg), and Arsenic (As) than controls. These concentrations correlated each other, indicating a common source. Toenail Barium (Ba) concentration was higher in the control- than in the exposed area. The location of the attended school was a predictor of Cd, Hg, Ni, Ba concentrations, after adjusting for confounders. In conclusion, children living and attending school in an urban area exposed to cement plant emissions show a chronic bioaccumulation of toxic metals, and a significant exposure to PM10 pollution. Cement plants located in populous urban areas seem therefore harmful, and primary prevention policies to protect children health are needed.Entities:
Keywords: Biomonitoring; Cement plants; Children health; Heavy metals; Nitrogen dioxide; PM10
Year: 2021 PMID: 34189342 PMCID: PMC8229267 DOI: 10.1007/s12403-021-00412-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expo Health ISSN: 2451-9766 Impact factor: 11.422
Fig. 1Map of the explored city (Barletta, southern Italy, Apulia region), with a colorimetric modeling of the average yearly ground concentrations of PM10 emitted by the cement plant, following atmospheric transport. The site of the cement plant is delimited by a black line. The ground concentrations of PM10 generated by the cement plant have been estimated by a 3-D Lagrangian model (Rotatori and Pirrone 2012). According to the dispersion model, the urban area with the minimal estimated ground concentrations of PM10 (i.e., below 0.5 μg/m3) has been considered as the control area. The exposed urban area was that with estimated ground concentration of PM10 in the range between 0.5 and 40 μg/m3. The five yellow marks indicate the location of the explored schools (i.e., two exposed, three control schools). The black triangle indicates the location of the air monitoring station positioned in the high exposure area. The blue triangle indicates the location of the air monitoring station positioned in the intermediate exposure area. In the inlet, the red triangle indicates the monitoring station used for control exposure (see methods section). Map elaborated from Google Earth Pro and pollutant dispersion model (Rotatori and Pirrone 2012)
Average concentration of air pollutants in the exposed and in the control area
| Control area | Intermediate exposure area | ||
|---|---|---|---|
PM10 (µg/m3) Mean of daily (24 h) concentrations in the 4 months before toenail sampling Annual mean (year 2019) | 20.8 ± 0.9 21.8 ± 0.6 | 23.3 ± 0.9* 22.0 ± 0.6 | 27.8 ± 1.0*° 25.5 ± 0.6*° |
NO2(µg/m3) Mean of daily (24 h) concentrations in the 4 months before toenail sampling Annual mean (year 2019) | 77.2 ± 2.7 62.0 ± 1.6 | 59.0 ± 2.2* 43.0 ± 1.5* | 50.8 ± 1.9*° 59.5 ± 1.6*° |
PM particulate matter with a diameter of ≤ 10 µm; NO nitrogen dioxide. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of daily (24 h) concentrations of air pollutants measured during the 4 months before toenail sampling (November 1st to February 27, 2020), and during the whole year 2019 (annual mean). Differences were tested by Kruskal–Wallis Multiple-Comparison Z Value Test
*P = 0.000001vs control area; P = 0.000001 vs intermediate exposure area
Absolute toenail metals concentration in children attending school in the exposed or control area
| Metal | Exposed schools | Control school | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Be | 0 | 0 | – |
| B | 0.11 ± 0.11 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Ti | 0.15 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | NS |
| V | 0.008 ± 0.004 | 0.047 ± 0.01 | NS |
| Cr | 0.28 ± 0.09 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | NS |
| Mn | 0.57 ± 0.13 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | NS |
| Co | 0.18 ± 0.1 | 0.19 ± 0.2 | NS |
| Ni | 0.97 ± 0.7 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.0003 |
| Cu | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.8 | NS |
| Zn | 76.5 ± 1.8 | 78.6 ± 3.8 | NS |
| As | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | NS |
| Se | 0 | 0.007 ± 0.003 | NS |
| Mo | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | NS |
| Ag | 0.02 ± 0.005 | 0.02 ± 0.009 | NS |
| Cd | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.01 ± 0.004 | 0.01 |
| Sb | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | NS |
| Te | 0 | 0 | – |
| Ba | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 7.8 ± 1.7 | 0.004 |
| W | 0.006 ± 0.006 | 0.027 ± 0.03 | NS |
| Hg | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.001 |
| Tl | 0 | 0 | – |
| Pb | 0.36 ± 0.7 | 0.67 ± 0.2 | NS |
| Th | 0 | 0 | – |
| U | 0.008 ± 0.005 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | NS |
Data are expressed in μg/g. Values are reported as mean ± SEM. Differences were tested by Mann–Whitney U test
NS not significant
Fig. 2Absolute number of toenail samples with metal concentration above the limit of detection (LOD) for each of the explored metals. Samples were from children attending school in the exposed or in the control area. Asterisks indicate P < 0.01 (χ2 test)
Absolute toenail metals concentration in children selected according to the location of both attended school and home address
| Group A | Group B | Group C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 189 | 110 | 67 | |
| Ni | 0.7 ± 0.18 0.28 (0–22.9) | 0.3 ± 0.07* 0 (0–4.5) | 2.0 ± 1.7* 0 (0–109.2) |
| Cd | 0.015 ± 0.004 0 (0–0.58) | 0.06 ± 0.02* 0 (0–1.2) | 0.1 ± 0.07 0 (0–4.2) |
| Ba | 7.9 ± 1.7 3.2 (0–198.6) | 4.6 ± 0.7 2.99 (0.58–61.7) | 3.3 ± 0.3* 2.5 (0.26–14.8) |
| Hg | 0.09 ± 0.01 0 (0–1.03) | 0.14 ± 0.02* 0.07 (0–1.56) | 0.16 ± 0.03* 0.08 (0–1.28) |
| As | 0.04 ± 0.005 0.009 (0–0.55) | 0.06 ± 0.02 0.036 (0–2.01) | 0.25 ± 0.18* 0.05 (0–12.0) |
Group A: children living and attending school in the control area; Group B: children living or attending school in the exposed area; Group C children living and attending school in the exposed area. Data are expressed in μg/g, and as means ± SEM, median (range)
*0.002 < P < 0.03 vs Group A (Kruskal–Wallis Multiple-Comparison Z Value test)
Results of Tobit regression models on toenail metal concentrations in children attending control and exposed schools, and the effect of covariates
| Cd | Hg | Ni | Ba | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control vs. exposed | 0.07* (− 0.12 to -0.018) | − 0.03** (− 0.05 to (− 0.02) | 0.1* (0.03 to 0.18) | 0.08** (0.03 to 0.13) |
| Domestic heating with biomass | − 0.6 (− 251.6 to 251.8) | 0.08 (− 0.09 to 0.3) | 0.16 (− 0.46 to 0.8) | 0.008 (0.45 to 0.5) |
| Orthodontic treatments | 0.0007 (− 0.09 to 0.09) | 0.007 (− 0.03 to 0.04) | − 0.03 (0.04 to 0.5) | − 0.04 (− 0.14 to 0.05) |
| Outdoor sports | 0.0004 (− 0.06 to 0.06) | 0.01 (− 0.2 to 0.3) | − 0.08 (− 0.18 to 0.1) | − 0.05 (− 0.11 to 0.01) |
| Passive smoke | − 0.8 (− 250.1 to 251.8) | − 0.08 (− 0.008 to 0.04) | 0.03 (− 0.57 to 0.6) | − 0.18 (− 0.6 to 0.3) |
| Consumption of locally grown vegetables | − 3.3 (− 0.1 to 0.05) | 0.08 (− 0.08 to 0.04) | 0.5 (− 0.1 to 1.1) | − 0.05 (− 0.5 to 0.4) |
− 1.67 (− 1.8 to − 1.5) | − 2.31 (− 2.4 to − 2.2) | − 1.03 (− 1.1 to − 0.9) | − 1.25 (− 1.3 to − 1.18) |
Only significant results (metal concentration) are presented. Metal concentrations were log-transformed to meet the normal assumption. Results (β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals) have been adjusted for covariates and consider the left-censored data present in metals distribution
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01
Spearman’s correlation matrix considering the toenail concentrations of Ni, Cd, Ba, Hg, and as in the whole cohort of enrolled children
| Ni | Cd | Ba | Hg | As | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ni | – | ||||
| – | |||||
| Cd | 0.17 | ||||
| Ba | 0.21 | 0.089 | – | ||
| – | |||||
| Hg | 0.069 | 0.11 | − 0.03 | – | |
| – | |||||
| As | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.007 | – |
| – |
Data are Spearman correlation coefficients (rho, normal text) and P values (in italic). Significant P values are marked in bold