Literature DB >> 30381867

Women's views about a free breast pump service: Online survey informing intervention development.

Rhona J McInnes1, Nicola Gillespie2, Nicola Crossland3, Victoria Hall Moran4, Pat Hoddinott5.   

Abstract

Improving breastfeeding outcomes is a global priority; however, in the United Kingdom, continuation of breastfeeding remains low. Growing empirical evidence suggests a free breast pump service might be an acceptable and feasible incentive intervention to improve breastfeeding outcomes and reduce heath inequalities. To inform intervention development, we conducted an online survey with women recruited via social media using snowball sampling. Data were analysed descriptively (closed questions) with qualitative thematic analysis (free text). The survey was completed by 666 women, most of whom had recently breastfed and used a breast pump. Participants agreed that free pump hire (rental/loan; 567 women; 85.1%) or a free pump to keep (408; 61.3%) should be provided. Free text comments provided by 408 women (free pump) and 309 women (free hire) highlighted potential benefits: helping women to continue breastfeeding; express milk; overcome difficulties; and pump choice. Concerns are possible effect on breast milk supply, reduced breastfeeding, pumps replacing good support for breastfeeding, and pump hire hygiene. Personal and societal costs are important issues. Some suggested a pump service should be for low-income mothers, those with feeding difficulties or sick/preterm infants. A one-size service would not suit all and vouchers were proposed. Some suggested fees and deposits to prevent waste. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting views about the acceptability of providing a free breast pump hire service. Mothers support and wish to have a say in breast pump service development. Future evaluations should address impact on feeding outcomes, professional support, hygiene for hired pumps, and costs.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast milk; breast pump; breastfeeding; expressing; inequalities; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30381867      PMCID: PMC7198920          DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  25 in total

1.  Breastfeeding women's experience of expressing: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Sarah N Clemons; Lisa H Amir
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.219

Review 2.  Incentives to promote breastfeeding: a systematic review.

Authors:  Victoria Hall Moran; Heather Morgan; Kieran Rothnie; Graeme MacLennan; Fiona Stewart; Gillian Thomson; Nicola Crossland; David Tappin; Marion Campbell; Pat Hoddinott
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Trends in the expression of breastmilk 1993-2003.

Authors:  C W Binns; N N Win; Y Zhao; J A Scott
Journal:  Breastfeed Rev       Date:  2006-11

4.  Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy (BIBS): a mixed-methods study to inform trial design.

Authors:  Heather Morgan; Pat Hoddinott; Gill Thomson; Nicola Crossland; Shelley Farrar; Deokhee Yi; Jenni Hislop; Victoria Hall Moran; Graeme MacLennan; Stephan U Dombrowski; Kieran Rothnie; Fiona Stewart; Linda Bauld; Anne Ludbrook; Fiona Dykes; Falko F Sniehotta; David Tappin; Marion Campbell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Factors associated with weaning in the first 3 months postpartum.

Authors:  Kendra Schwartz; Hannah J S D'Arcy; Brenda Gillespie; Janet Bobo; MaryLou Longeway; Betsy Foxman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Predictors of breastmilk expression by 1 month postpartum and influence on breastmilk feeding duration.

Authors:  Sheela Geraghty; Barbara Davidson; Meredith Tabangin; Ardythe Morrow
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Pumping Milk Without Ever Feeding at the Breast in the Moms2Moms Study.

Authors:  Sarah A Keim; Kelly M Boone; Reena Oza-Frank; Sheela R Geraghty
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?

Authors:  Nigel C Rollins; Nita Bhandari; Nemat Hajeebhoy; Susan Horton; Chessa K Lutter; Jose C Martines; Ellen G Piwoz; Linda M Richter; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 202.731

9.  Significant others, situations and infant feeding behaviour change processes: a serial qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Rhona J McInnes; Pat Hoddinott; Jane Britten; Kirsty Darwent; Leone C A Craig
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Breast pumps as an incentive for breastfeeding: a mixed methods study of acceptability.

Authors:  Nicola Crossland; Gill Thomson; Heather Morgan; Graeme MacLennan; Marion Campbell; Fiona Dykes; Pat Hoddinott
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.092

View more
  3 in total

1.  Experiences of young Australian mothers with infant feeding.

Authors:  Christa Buckland; Debra Hector; Gregory S Kolt; Jack Thepsourinthone; Amit Arora
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Women's views about a free breast pump service: Online survey informing intervention development.

Authors:  Rhona J McInnes; Nicola Gillespie; Nicola Crossland; Victoria Hall Moran; Pat Hoddinott
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Advice from Canadian Mothers Who Express Human Milk: An Interpretive Description Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Jodie Bigalky; Marie Dietrich Leurer; Janet McCabe; April Mackey; Dana Laczko; Virginia Deobald
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-10-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.