Literature DB >> 30377999

Meta-analysis for diagnostic tests.

Anastasia M Hartzes1, Charity J Morgan2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2018        PMID： 30377999     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-018-01485-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations.

Authors:  C M Rutter; C A Gatsonis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-17

3.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

Authors:  Johannes B Reitsma; Afina S Glas; Anne W S Rutjes; Rob J P M Scholten; Patrick M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  F-18 FDG PET for assessment of disease activity of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Woo Lee; Seong-Jang Kim; Youngduk Seo; Shin Young Jeong; Byeong-Cheol Ahn; Jaetae Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Rajat Kalra; Pankaj Arora; Charity Morgan; Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian; Navkaranbir S Bajaj
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  M M G Leeflang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 8.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Juneyoung Lee; Kyung Won Kim; Sang Hyun Choi; Jimi Huh; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  A step-by-step guide to the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic test accuracy evaluations.

Authors:  Z Liu; Z Yao; C Li; X Liu; H Chen; C Gao
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.640
  9 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic performance of serology against histologic assessment to diagnose Sjogren's syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luiz Claudio Viegas-Costa; Reid Friesen; Carlos Flores-Mir; Timothy McGaw
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Standardization of SYBR Green-Based Real-Time PCR Through the Evaluation of Different Thresholds for Different Skin Layers: An Accuracy Study and Track of the Transmission Potential of Multibacillary and Paucibacillary Leprosy Patients.

Authors:  Lais Sevilha-Santos; Selma Regina Penha Silva Cerqueira; Ciro Martins Gomes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Paediatric tuberculosis diagnosis using Mycobacterium tuberculosis real-time polymerase chain reaction assay: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Oladipo Babafemi; Benny P Cherian; Beatrice Ouma; Gilbert Mangua Mogoko
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-27

4.  The Efficiency of Commercial Immunodiagnostic Assays for the Field Detection of Schistosoma japonicum Human Infections: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhongqiu Mei; Shan Lv; Liguang Tian; Wei Wang; Tiewu Jia
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-07-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.