| Literature DB >> 30375489 |
Zilong Li1,2, Kaiwen Pan3, Akash Tariq1,2, Feng Sun1,2, Sizhong Wang1,2, Lin Zhang1, Xiaoming Sun1, Xiaogang Wu1, Dagang Song1,2.
Abstract
A complete randomized design was implemented with two watering regimes (extreme rainfall and control) and three different plant combinations (Zanthoxylum bungeanum, Z. bungeanum + Capsicum annum, Z. bungeanum + Glycine max) in order to assess the morphological and physio-biochemical responses of focal and neighbor plants. The results indicated that, extreme rainfall had significantly negative impacts on Z. bungeanum in three intercropping systems. However, intercropping with G. max improved the transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs), raised leaf relative water content (LRWC), increased chlorophyll a (Chl a) and carotenoid (Car) content, and enhanced the superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) of Z. bungeanum. After recovery, the Z. bungeanum + G. max mixed culture significantly increased soil NO3--N, improved the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci) and Tr, upregulated soluble sugar and proline, and enhanced hydrogen peroxidase activity (CAT). Moreover, the higher root biomass of G. max provided much more nitrogen for Z. bungeanum via the return of organic matter. However, intercropping with C. annum significantly increased active oxygen (ROS). Compared with neighboring species, in intercropping systems, G. max could have improved the tolerance of the focal species Z. bungeanum in response to extreme rainfall and its recovery after extreme rainfall.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30375489 PMCID: PMC6207775 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34449-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Soil physical and chemical properties after recovery. “Z-G” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with G. max, “Z-C” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with C. annuum, and “Z” denotes the Z. bungeanum monoculture.
| Treatment stages | Plant system | Z | Z-C | Z-G | System | Rainfall | System*Rainfall | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traits | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | ||||
| Recovery 30 days | Soil water content (%) | 18.03 ± 0.57A | 17.82 ± 0.46A | 18.24 ± 0.25A | 18.79 ± 1.81A | 19.24 ± 0.76A | 18.33 ± 0.98A |
|
|
|
| NH4+-N (mg kg−1) | 5.74 ± 0.83B | 6.18 ± 1.01AB | 10.01 ± 1.07A | 9.34 ± 1.43AB | 7.28 ± 0.14B | 12.45 ± 3.10AB | *** | *** | *** | |
| NO3−-N (mg kg−1) | 3.42 ± 0.24AB | 2.37 ± 0.55BC | 4.15 ± 0.21A | 1.13 ± 0.27C | 3.37 ± 0.69A | 4.97 ± 0.64A | *** | ** | *** | |
Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among all treatments. ANOVA was used to assess the effects of extreme rainfall on soil properties. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, nsnon-significant (P > 0.05).
Leaf nitrogen content of Z. bungeanum and neighbor crops. “Z-G” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with G. max, “Z-C” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with C. annuum, and “Z” denotes the Z. bungeanum monoculture. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among all treatments.
| Plant system | Z | Z-C | Z-G | System | Rainfall | System* Rainfall | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traits | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | |||
| NH4+-N content of | 5.61 ± 0.68B | 3.24 ± 0.17C | 4.60 ± 0.49B | 3.97 ± 0.25C | 8.71 ± 0.38A | 5.44 ± 0.29B | *** | *** | * |
| NH4+-N content of neighbor crops leaves (mg g−1) | 2.60 ± 0.11A | 2.46 ± 0.20A | 2.65 ± 0.33A | 2.44 ± 0.14A |
|
|
| ||
| NO3−-N content of | 13.03 ± 0.62A | 12.16 ± 0.67A | 12.78 ± 0.73A | 10.81 ± 0.98A | 13.08 ± 1.05A | 13.85 ± 1.01A | ns | ns | ns |
| NO3−-N content of neighbor crops leaves (mg g−1) | 20.14 ± 1.37A | 14.89 ± 0.96A | 17.36 ± 1.33A | 9.93 ± 0.83B |
|
|
| ||
ANOVA was used to assess the effects of extreme rainfall on leaf nitrogen content. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, nsnon-significant (P > 0.05).
Effects on the growth parameters of Z. bungeanum and neighbor crops after treatment and recovery. “Z-G” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with G. max, “Z-C” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with C. annuum, and “Z” denotes the Z. bungeanum monoculture. “LRWC” denotes leaf relative water content.
| Treatment stages | Plant system | Z | Z-C | Z-G | System | Rainfall | System* Rainfall | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traits | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | ||||
| 30 day | LRWC (100%) | 0.86 ± 0.02A | 0.81 ± 0.02AB | 0.70 ± 0.08B | 0.65 ± 0.02B | 0.86 ± 0.02A | 0.79 ± 0.08AB | *** | * | ns |
| Height (cm) | 151.0 ± 11.15A | 142.7 ± 8.84AB | 180.0 ± 15.31A | 111.5 ± 6.64B | 158.0 ± 27.51A | 126.0 ± 14.00AB | ns | * | ns | |
| Aboveground weight of neighbor crops (g) | 6.26 ± 0.33B | 3.53 ± 0.24C | 9.68 ± 0.51A | 3.57 ± 0.32C | / | / | / | |||
| Recovery 30 day | LRWC (100%) | 0.53 ± 0.02B | 0.58 ± 0.01B | 0.53 ± 0.00B | 0.59 ± 0.05B | 0.67 ± 0.06A | 0.64 ± 0.11AB | ns | ns | ns |
| Height (cm) | 165.0 ± 7.57A | 152.7 ± 2.73A | 175.0 ± 13.86A | 123.0 ± 13.31A | 155.3 ± 28.18A | 147.7 ± 9.26A | ns | ns | ns | |
| Yield (g) | 90.83 ± 0.38A | 24.47 ± ± 4.50B | 3.89 ± 1.21C | 1.00 ± 0.31D | / | / | / | |||
| Root biomass of neighbor crops (g) | 8.70 ± ± 2.14A | 7.32 ± 1.54A | 4.46 ± 0.52B | 8.20 ± 0.89A | / | / | / | |||
| Stem and leaf weight of neighbor crops (g) | 7.66 ± 0.27B | 7.44 ± 0.56B | 22.38 ± 1.87A | 8.03 ± 1.08B | / | / | / | |||
Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among all treatments. ANOVA was used to assess the effects of extreme rainfall on plant growth. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, nsnon-significant (P > 0.05).
Effects on the photosynthetic parameters of Z. bungeanum after treatment and recovery. “Z-G” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with G. max, “Z-C” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with C. annuum, and “Z” denotes Z. bungeanum monoculture. “P” denotes net photosynthetic, “G” denotes stomatal conductance, “C” denotes intercellular carbon dioxide concentration, “T” denotes transpiration rate.
| Treatment stages | Plant system | Z | Z-C | Z-G | System | Rainfall | System*Rainfall | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traits | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | ||||
| 30 days | 15.36 ± 0.03A | 13.39 ± 0.16B | 14.39 ± 1.15A | 10.69 ± 0.59C | 13.94 ± 0.87A | 10.74 ± 0.73C | ** | *** | ns | |
| 0.32 ± 0.01A | 0.29 ± 0.02A | 0.19 ± 0.04A | 0.18 ± 0.03AB | 0.32 ± 0.06A | 0.31 ± 0.00A | ** | ns | ns | ||
| 305.06 ± 5.47A | 279.54 ± 12.69A | 271.15 ± ± 3.57AB | 269.35 ± 0.38AB | 302.40 ± 10.86A | 294.72 ± 5.52A | ** | ns | ns | ||
| 3.55 ± 0.18B | 3.56 ± 0.01B | 3.70 ± 0.03B | 2.58 ± 0.14C | 3.56 ± 0.15B | 4.05 ± 0.04A | * | *** | *** | ||
| Recovery 30 days | 7.45 ± 0.93B | 7.78 ± 0.59B | 13.57 ± 0.38A | 7.91 ± 2.34B | 10.96 ± 1.28A | 9.24 ± 1.18AB | ** | * | * | |
| 0.13 ± 0.02A | 0.13 ± 0.00A | 0.11 ± 0.03A | 0.13 ± 0.04A | 0.13 ± 0.01A | 0.22 ± 0.41A | ns | * | ns | ||
| 261.48 ± 16.7A | 249.47 ± 21.6AB | 279.04 ± 30.3AB | 223.08 ± 34.9BC | 311.90 ± ± 13.67A | 310.40 ± 0.6A | * | ns | ns | ||
| 1.31 ± 0.10A | 1.23 ± 0.05A | 0.80 ± 0.08C | 1.06 ± 0.01B | 0.77 ± 0.12C | 1.13 ± 0.01B | *** | ** | * | ||
Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the control (normal rainfall) treatments; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the extreme rainfall treatments. ANOVA was used to assess the effects of extreme rainfall on photosynthetic parameters. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, nsnon-significant (P > 0.05).
Effects on pigment parameters of Z. bungeanum after treatment and recovery. “Z-G” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with G. max, “Z-C” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with C. annuum, and “Z” denotes the Z. bungeanum monoculture. “Chl a” denotes chlorophyll a, “Chl b” denotes chlorophyll b, and “Car” denotes carotenoid. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among all treatments.
| Treatment stages | Plant system | Z | Z-C | Z-G | System | Rainfall | System* Rainfall | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traits | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | Control | Extreme rainfall | ||||
| 30 days | Chl a (mg g−1 FW) | 4.86 ± 0.47B | 4.57 ± 0.09B | 4.69 ± 0.10B | 4.47 ± 0.02B | 4.97 ± 0.36B | 6.98 ± 0.37A | ** | ns | ** |
| Chl b (mg g−1 FW) | 2.25 ± 0.06A | 2.14 ± 0.06AB | 2.86 ± 0.22A | 2.37 ± 0.16A | 1.70 ± 0.30B | 2.66 ± 0.12A | ns | ns | ** | |
| Car (mg g−1 FW) | 1.54 ± 0.23B | 1.85 ± 0.06B | 2.07 ± 0.17B | 1.94 ± 0.11B | 1.90 ± 0.04B | 2.43 ± 0.07A | * | * | ns | |
| Chl a/Chl b | 2.16 ± 0.16B | 2.13 ± 0.07B | 1.66 ± 0.16B | 1.91 ± 0.13B | 3.04 ± 0.35A | 2.63 ± 0.02A | *** | ns | ns | |
| Recovery 30 days | Chl a (mg g−1 FW) | 4.27 ± 0.24B | 5.33 ± 0.19A | 3.44 ± 0.13C | 4.74 ± 0.07A | 3.97 ± 0.16BC | 4.68 ± 0.72AB | ns | ** | ns |
| Chl b (mg g−1 FW) | 2.02 ± 0.11C | 2.44 ± 0.07AB | 1.54 ± 0.11D | 3.24 ± 0.34A | 2.10 ± 0.03BC | 2.31 ± 0.25B | ns | *** | ** | |
| Car (mg g−1 FW) | 1.83 ± 0.03B | 2.23 ± 0.09A | 1.51 ± 0.03C | 1.83 ± 0.16BC | 2.23 ± 0.11A | 2.16 ± 0.06AB | *** | * | ns | |
| Chl a/Chl b | 2.11 ± 0.01A | 2.18 ± 0.01A | 2.24 ± 0.08A | 1.49 ± 0.15C | 1.89 ± 0.10B | 2.02 ± 0.19AB | ns | ns | ** | |
ANOVA was used to assess the effects of extreme rainfall on leaf pigment content. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, nsnon-significant (P > 0.05).
Figure 1Effects of free radical and MDA content on focal species after extreme rainfall and recovery. The left column represents 30 days of rainfall, the right column represents recovery for 30 days; “Z-G” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with G. max, “Z-C” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with C. annuum, and “Z” denotes the Z. bungeanum monoculture. Vertical bars show ± SE of the mean (n± SE). Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the control (normal rainfall) treatments; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the extreme rainfall treatments. “r” denotes extreme rainfall; “s” denotes planting system; “r × s” denotes the interaction of extreme rainfall and planting system; Proportion of explained variance by extreme rainfall and planting system effects and by their interactions (two-way ANOVA). Significant levels: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, “ns” no significant.
Figure 2Effects of leaf SOD and CAT activity on focal species after extreme rainfall and recovery. The left column represents 30 days of rainfall, the right column represents recovery for 30 days; “Z-G” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with G. max, “Z-C” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with C. annuum, and “Z” denotes the Z. bungeanum monoculture. Vertical bars show ± SE of the mean (n± SE). Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the control (normal rainfall) treatments; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the extreme rainfall treatments. “r” denotes extreme rainfall; “s” denotes planting system; “r × s” denotes the interaction of extreme rainfall and planting system; Proportion of explained variance by extreme rainfall and planting system effects and by their interactions (two-way ANOVA). Significant levels: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, “ns” no significant.
Figure 3Effects of leaf osmotic adjustment substances on focal species after extreme rainfall and recovery. The left column represents 30 days of rainfall, the right column represents recovery for 30 days; “Z-G” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with G. max, “Z-C” denotes Z. bungeanum intercropping with C. annuum, and “Z” denotes the Z. bungeanum monoculture. Vertical bars show ± SE of the mean (n± SE). Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the control (normal rainfall) treatments; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the extreme rainfall treatments. “r” denotes extreme rainfall; “s” denotes planting system; “r × s” denotes the interaction of extreme rainfall and planting system; Proportion of explained variance by extreme rainfall and planting system effects and by their interactions (two-way ANOVA). Significant levels: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, “ns” no significant.