Literature DB >> 27082663

A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.

Ajay Aroor Rao1, Jennifer Feneis1, Chloe Lalonde1, Haydee Ojeda-Fournier1.   

Abstract

Initially developed in 1993, the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon serves to standardize breast imaging reports, improve communication with referring physicians, and provide a quality assurance tool. The long-awaited BI-RADS fifth edition consolidates, improves, and expands the lexicon for mammography, breast ultrasonography (US), and breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The new edition has increased the number of imaging examples to nearly 600. The breast MR imaging lexicon is significantly expanded since it first appeared in the fourth edition. New terms have been added to the US lexicon to reflect technologic advances. Minor but important changes have been made to the mammography section. Calcification descriptors in the lexicon are now consolidated into two categories: benign and suspicious. The controversial "intermediate concern" grouping has been eliminated, and a table in the lexicon summarizes the literature supporting the recommendation to biopsy such calcifications. New descriptors such as "developing asymmetry" are illustrated, and abstracts are provided to reference their significance. A generous guidance section is included after the lexicon description for each modality. Useful frequently asked questions are succinctly answered, and the literature to support each answer is included in the reference section for each modality. This review article illustrates and highlights changes to the BI-RADS lexicon and provides readers with a general overview to familiarize them with the fifth edition. (©)RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27082663     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  50 in total

1.  The need for standardization of nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS): Learning from coronary artery disease (CAD), breast imaging (BI), liver imaging (LI), and prostate imaging (PI) RADS.

Authors:  Majid Assadi; Erik Velez; Mohammad Hosein Najafi; Ali Gholamrezanezhad
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy.

Authors:  Hale Aydin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  A review of mammographic positioning image quality criteria for the craniocaudal projection.

Authors:  Rhonda-Joy I Sweeney; Sarah J Lewis; Peter Hogg; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Automated classification of focal breast lesions according to S-detect: validation and role as a clinical and teaching tool.

Authors:  Mattia Di Segni; Valeria de Soccio; Vito Cantisani; Giacomo Bonito; Antonello Rubini; Gabriele Di Segni; Sveva Lamorte; Valentina Magri; Corrado De Vito; Giuseppe Migliara; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Alessio Metere; Laura Giacomelli; Carlo de Felice; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-04-21

5.  The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density.

Authors:  Susanne Wienbeck; Johannes Uhlig; Susanne Luftner-Nagel; Antonia Zapf; Alexey Surov; Eva von Fintel; Vera Stahnke; Joachim Lotz; Uwe Fischer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Psychological consequences of MRI-based screening among women with strong family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew Castelo; Zachary Brown; Josephine A D'Abbondanza; Nastasia V Wasilewski; Andrea Eisen; Derek Muradali; Bettina E Hansen; Eva Grunfeld; Adena S Scheer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Radiological, Histological and Chemical Analysis of Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Value and Biological Significance.

Authors:  Rita Bonfiglio; Manuel Scimeca; Nicola Toschi; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Elena Giannini; Chiara Antonacci; Sara Ciuffa; Virginia Tancredi; Umberto Tarantino; Loredana Albonici; Elena Bonanno
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Sergei Zolotarev; Inge Hillman; Konstantinos Karalis; Dzmitry Stsepankou; Valeriy Vengrinovich; Jürgen Hesser; Tony M Svahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  MRI-based radiomics analysis for differentiating phyllodes tumors of the breast from fibroadenomas.

Authors:  Mitsuteru Tsuchiya; Takayuki Masui; Kazuma Terauchi; Takahiro Yamada; Motoyuki Katyayama; Shintaro Ichikawa; Yoshifumi Noda; Satoshi Goshima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diagnostic value of an automated breast volume scanner compared with a hand-held ultrasound: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Juan Chen; Yidong Zhou; Feng Mao; Yan Lin; Songjie Shen; Qiang Sun; Zhaolian Ouyang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.