| Midterm evaluation |
| Positive reflections on short message service (SMS) text messaging intervention |
| | Timely delivery in most intervention areas | [I remember receiving messages] once a week…sometimes two to three messages in the week [including messages inquiring BFa status from research group]. [EBFb, 4 months postpartum] |
| | Acceptable and appropriate intervention frequency and intensity | I feel the weekly message is good. I feel this frequency can cover all information of my needs during the week. [EBF, 5 months postpartum] |
| | Anticipatory and appropriate SMS text messaging contents | The messages were sent timely, [the contents are] always a bit earlier than what will happen. [EBF, 4 months postpartum]I learnt not to feed sugar water to baby in one message. My parents used to feed my baby sugar water. But since I received the message, we do not give it anymore. [Mixed infant feeding, less than 1 month postpartum] |
| | Replying to questions being helpful in dealing with problems of infant feeding | I made an inquiry of what to do with inadequate breast milk after returning to work through the message. I felt the response was very helpful. [EBF, 5 months postpartum] |
| Problems emerging at midterm evaluation |
| | The occasional failure of message sending in one neighborhood due to unstable mobile signal in the area | It seems every a couple of weeks [for receiving messages]…the telecom signal is not very good in my house area. [Mixed infant feeding, 4 months postpartum] |
| | High expectation on timely response to inquiries | Sometimes I got responses very quickly, but I received the message on the following day if I sent the question at night. [Having stopped breastfeeding, 4 months postpartum] |
| Final qualitative evaluation |
| Strength of SMS text messaging |
| | Convenient to save, read, repeatedly review, and share with others | I saved all messages. And usually I shared them with my mother-in-law…Sometime she does not agree with me on some infant feeding practice, so I show the message to her. For example, she wanted to feed egg to the baby at 4 months, I declined, but she continued to try and said she already fed my husband when he was 4 months old. But after I showed the message to her, she then stopped. [BF to 10 months, returned to work at 4 months] |
| | Timely support and anticipatory guiding | To me, messages allow me continuously learn about [infant feeding]. The contents [of messages] match the age of my baby, and they can be applied to the practice soon. [EBF to 6 months, BF to 9 months, return to work 14 months postpartum] |
| | Easy to build the trust | I feel the messages like a friend of mine. I do not go to the internet to search for specific information now. I am accustomed to receiving the weekly message and feel this is a very natural thing. [EBF to 6 months, returned to work at 4.5 months] |
| Weakness of SMS text messaging |
| | Limited information due to the word limit of messages | I feel messages could be a reference for me, but the content is not long enough. [Infant formula feeding, returned to work at 6.5 months] |
| | Messages could have been more “personalized” | I feel the messages were similar to those on the internet and books. I would prefer information that could not be found in the internet, particularly on how to let my baby eat more. [BF to 9 months, returned to work at 4 months] |