David A Raichlen1, Yann C Klimentidis2,3, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu2, Gene E Alexander3,4,5,6,7,8. 1. School of Anthropology, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson. 3. BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson. 4. Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry. 5. Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute. 6. Neuroscience Graduate Interdisciplinary Program. 7. Physiological Sciences Graduate Interdisciplinary Program. 8. Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accelerometers are included in a wide range of devices that monitor and track physical activity for health-related applications. However, the clinical utility of the information embedded in their rich time-series data has been greatly understudied and has yet to be fully realized. Here, we examine the potential for fractal complexity of actigraphy data to serve as a clinical biomarker for mortality risk. METHODS: We use detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) to analyze actigraphy data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; n = 11,694). The DFA method measures fractal complexity (signal self-affinity across time-scales) as correlations between the amplitude of signal fluctuations in time-series data across a range of time-scales. The slope, α, relating the fluctuation amplitudes to the time-scales over which they were measured describes the complexity of the signal. RESULTS: Fractal complexity of physical activity (α) decreased significantly with age (p = 1.29E-6) and was lower in women compared with men (p = 1.79E-4). Higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in older adults and in women were associated with greater fractal complexity. In adults aged 50-79 years, lower fractal complexity of activity (α) was associated with greater mortality (hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval = 0.49-0.82) after adjusting for age, exercise engagement, chronic diseases, and other covariates associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable accelerometers can provide a noninvasive biomarker of physiological aging and mortality risk after adjusting for other factors strongly associated with mortality. Thus, this fractal analysis of accelerometer signals provides a novel clinical application for wearable accelerometers, advancing efforts for remote monitoring of physiological health by clinicians.
BACKGROUND: Accelerometers are included in a wide range of devices that monitor and track physical activity for health-related applications. However, the clinical utility of the information embedded in their rich time-series data has been greatly understudied and has yet to be fully realized. Here, we examine the potential for fractal complexity of actigraphy data to serve as a clinical biomarker for mortality risk. METHODS: We use detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) to analyze actigraphy data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; n = 11,694). The DFA method measures fractal complexity (signal self-affinity across time-scales) as correlations between the amplitude of signal fluctuations in time-series data across a range of time-scales. The slope, α, relating the fluctuation amplitudes to the time-scales over which they were measured describes the complexity of the signal. RESULTS: Fractal complexity of physical activity (α) decreased significantly with age (p = 1.29E-6) and was lower in women compared with men (p = 1.79E-4). Higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in older adults and in women were associated with greater fractal complexity. In adults aged 50-79 years, lower fractal complexity of activity (α) was associated with greater mortality (hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval = 0.49-0.82) after adjusting for age, exercise engagement, chronic diseases, and other covariates associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable accelerometers can provide a noninvasive biomarker of physiological aging and mortality risk after adjusting for other factors strongly associated with mortality. Thus, this fractal analysis of accelerometer signals provides a novel clinical application for wearable accelerometers, advancing efforts for remote monitoring of physiological health by clinicians.
Authors: M P Tulppo; R L Hughson; T H Mäkikallio; K E Airaksinen; T Seppänen; H V Huikuri Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Keith P Gennuso; Ronald E Gangnon; Charles E Matthews; Keith M Thraen-Borowski; Lisa H Colbert Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Svati H Shah; Donna Arnett; Steven R Houser; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Calum MacRae; Seema Mital; Joseph Loscalzo; Jennifer L Hall Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K Berkemeyer; K Wijndaele; T White; A J M Cooper; R Luben; K Westgate; S J Griffin; K T Khaw; N J Wareham; S Brage Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Stefan E Huber; Pierre Sachse; Andreas Mauracher; Josef Marksteiner; Wilfried Pohl; Elisabeth M Weiss; Markus Canazei Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 5.750