Yin Wang1, Kuljeet Kaur1, Samantha J Scannelli1, Ronit Bitton2, John B Matson1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Virginia Tech Center for Drug Discovery, and Macromolecules Innovation Institute , Virginia Tech , Blacksburg , Virginia 24061 , United States. 2. Department of Chemical Engineering and the Ilze Kats Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology , Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer-Sheva 84105 , Israel.
Abstract
We report here on three constitutionally isomeric peptides, each of which contains two glutamic acid residues and two lysine residues functionalized with S-aroylthiooximes (SATOs), termed peptide-H2S donor conjugates (PHDCs). SATOs decompose in the presence of cysteine to generate hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a biological signaling gas with therapeutic potential. The PHDCs self-assemble in aqueous solution into different morphologies, two into nanoribbons of different dimensions and one into a rigid nanocoil. The rate of H2S release from the PHDCs depends on the morphology, with the nanocoil-forming PHDC exhibiting a complex release profile driven by morphological changes promoted by SATO decomposition. The nanocoil-forming PHDC mitigated the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin more effectively than its nanoribbon-forming constitutional isomers as well as common H2S donors. This strategy opens up new avenues to develop H2S-releasing biomaterials and highlights the interplay between structure and function from the molecular level to the nanoscale.
We report here on three constitutionally isomeric peptides, each of which contains two glutamic acid residues and two lysine residues functionalized with S-aroylthiooximes (SATOs), termed peptide-H2Sdonor conjugates (PHDCs). SATOs decompose in the presence of cysteine to generate hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a biological signaling gas with therapeutic potential. The PHDCs self-assemble in aqueous solution into different morphologies, two into nanoribbons of different dimensions and one into a rigid nanocoil. The rate of H2S release from the PHDCs depends on the morphology, with the nanocoil-forming PHDC exhibiting a complex release profile driven by morphological changes promoted by SATO decomposition. The nanocoil-forming PHDC mitigated the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin more effectively than its nanoribbon-forming constitutional isomers as well as common H2S donors. This strategy opens up new avenues to develop H2S-releasing biomaterials and highlights the interplay between structure and function from the molecular level to the nanoscale.
In proteins, amino
acid sequence dictates structure, which in turn
regulates biological function. Small changes often have a dramatic
effect; for example, hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) either promotes
or prevents lipid hydrolysis depending on the positions of a serine
and phosphoserine residue.[1] These two lipases,
both functional enzymes, are constitutional isomers, i.e., molecules
with identical molecular formulas but different connectivity. Constitutional
isomers have also been evaluated in synthetic self-assembling peptides,[2−7] which are of interest as materials for tissue engineering and regenerative
medicine.[8−10] For example, peptide amphiphiles with the sequence
C16-VVEE (C16 = palmitic acid) form rigid cylindrical
nanofibers, while twisted nanoribbons are observed for the constitutionally
isomeric sequence C16-EVEV.[11] This example highlights sequence dictating nanostructure, but sequence-specific
control of nanostructure, with concomitant impact on biological function,
has not previously been demonstrated in constitutional isomers. Inspired
by Nature’s ability to precisely control biological function
in constitutionally isomeric proteins, we aimed here to explore how
sequence in constitutionally isomeric self-assembling peptides affects
nanostructure and biological activity in the context of hydrogen sulfide
(H2S) signaling.H2S is a vital cellular
signaling molecule and one of
three established gasotransmitters along with nitric oxide (NO) and
carbon monoxide (CO), and it plays critical roles in many physiological
and/or pathological processes.[12] For example,
H2S is involved in heart disease, inflammation, and tumor
progression/suppression, among many other diseases and conditions.[12−15] Like NO and CO, H2S carries out its signaling functions
at low concentrations (generally in the range 10–1000 nM),
and physiological production of H2S is tightly controlled
by specific enzymes. Modulation of H2S levels, either through
inhibition/activation of native enzymes or via administration of exogenous
H2S, offers a way for scientists to uncover the role of
H2S in biology and holds therapeutic potential.[16]Due to the hazards inherent in working
with gaseous H2S directly, most of the foundational studies
in this area have relied
on administration of exogenous H2S, usually as an aqueous
solution of Na2S or NaHS.[17,18] Recognizing
that sulfide salts were not ideal compounds for studying H2S biology, researchers have developed several classes of H2S-releasing compounds (termed H2S donors) over the past
several years.[16,19−23] Many release H2S in response to specific
triggers, including light, biological thiols, pH changes, enzymatic
activity, and others. Despite these advances in the development of
synthetic H2S donors, most have low water solubility, limited
means for modulating release kinetics, and no capacity for targeted
delivery, all of which may limit H2S-based treatments due
to the reactive nature of this signaling molecule.To address
these limitations, our group and others have begun designing
and evaluating bioinspired H2S-releasing materials.[24−27] A particularly exciting type of material for use in drug and signal
delivery is self-assembling peptides. Designed to aggregate in water
into specific nanostructures, self-assembling peptides can be quickly
synthesized and purified because they consist only of a single peptide
or peptide conjugate.[28] Here we report
rationally designed peptide–H2Sdonor conjugates
(PHDCs), which spontaneously associate into discrete, stable supramolecular
nanostructures with the capacity for self-delivery of H2S (i.e., no additional carriers are needed). To make a series of
PHDCs, we appended S-aroylthiooximes (SATOs), a type
of thiol-triggered H2Sdonor, onto short peptide sequences.
Specifically, S-benzoylthiohydroxylamine (SBTHA)
was added in a condensation reaction to three different peptides,
each of which contained two Glu (E) residues and two 4-formylbenzoic
acid (FBA)-modified Lys (K) residues. This way, three constitutionally
isomeric PHDCs were prepared: K(FBA-SATO)EK(FBA-SATO)E (named K for short), K(FBA-SATO)K(FBA-SATO)EE
(K), and K(FBA-SATO)EEK(FBA-SATO)
(K) (Figure A–C). A control peptide that could
not release H2S (K) was synthesized in the same way, replacing SBTHA with O-benzylhydroxylamine. Detailed synthetic procedures and characterization
can be found in the Supporting Information (Figures S1 and S2).
Figure 1
(A–C) Schematic illustrations of the three isomeric
peptide–H2S donor conjugates (PHDCs) in this study.
(D–F) Cryo-TEM
characterization illustrates the effect of sequence on the self-assembled
morphology of constitutionally isomeric PHDCs: (D) cryo-TEM image
of twisted ribbons formed by K in aqueous solution, (E) cryo-TEM image of twisted ribbons formed
by K in aqueous solution,
and (F) cryo-TEM image of nanocoils formed by K in aqueous solution. (G) AFM phase image of nanocoils
formed by K in aqueous solution.
Solution concentration: 1 mM PHDCs in PBS (pH 7.4). (H) SAXS curve
of K in aqueous solution (1
mM in PBS at pH 7.4) with fitting to a helical model. (I–K)
Circular dichroism spectra of (I) K, (J) K, and (K) K in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)
at a concentration of 100 μM.
(A–C) Schematic illustrations of the three isomeric
peptide–H2Sdonor conjugates (PHDCs) in this study.
(D–F) Cryo-TEM
characterization illustrates the effect of sequence on the self-assembled
morphology of constitutionally isomeric PHDCs: (D) cryo-TEM image
of twisted ribbons formed by K in aqueous solution, (E) cryo-TEM image of twisted ribbons formed
by K in aqueous solution,
and (F) cryo-TEM image of nanocoils formed by K in aqueous solution. (G) AFM phase image of nanocoils
formed by K in aqueous solution.
Solution concentration: 1 mM PHDCs in PBS (pH 7.4). (H) SAXS curve
of K in aqueous solution (1
mM in PBS at pH 7.4) with fitting to a helical model. (I–K)
Circular dichroism spectra of (I) K, (J) K, and (K) K in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)
at a concentration of 100 μM.
Results and Discussion
Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy
(cryo-TEM) imaging (Figure D–F) and conventional
TEM (Figure S3) revealed that all PHDCs
assembled into one-dimensional nanostructures in aqueous solution.
The dominant morphology observed for K was twisted ribbons (Figure D), as indicated by the varying thickness and grayscale
intensity in both the conventional and cryo-TEM images. Widths were
14 ± 3 nm, and lengths were on the scale of a few micrometers.
Closer examination of the twisted ribbons revealed that their thickness
was 4 ± 1 nm, a value that is equal to the expected thickness
of a partially or fully interdigitated bilayer, implying that the
observed ribbons are likely bilayer structures caused by association
of the aromatic SATO surfaces. This kind of molecular packing behavior
has been widely found in peptide systems composed of uniform (AB) amino acid periodicity (where A and B are polar
and nonpolar residues, respectively).[11,29−32] Importantly, these images for peptide K indicate that non-natural amino acids, such as the
derivatized K residues used here, can also promote twisted ribbon
formation. The pitch of the twisted ribbons measured from the cryo-TEM
micrographs was 103 ± 8 nm.Peptide K also formed twisted
ribbons in aqueous solution (Figure E), but the dimensions were quite different from those
of K. The K ribbons had widths of 40 ± 6 nm and pitches
of 500 ± 10 nm. Both dimensions are three to four times larger
than those for the K ribbons.
With an average thickness of 5 ± 1 nm, these larger twisted ribbons
are also bilayer structures. We attribute the increase in width, pitch
length, and thickness to the enhanced steric hindrances and electrostatic
repulsions among side chains in K compared with K. The alternating
sequence of hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues in K allows the peptides to pack tightly during
self-assembly because hydrophobic SATO groups and hydrophilic Glu
residues display on opposite sides of the peptide backbone. In contrast,
the pair of charged, C-terminal Glu residues in K likely cause these peptides to repel each
other more strongly when two molecules approach during assembly. In
order to reach an energy minimum, K twists, increasing the distance between assembled molecules,
resulting in looser molecular packing within nanostructures than in K.A dramatically different
self-assembled morphology was observed
for K. PHDC K assembled into left-handed nanocoils with
an average diameter of 5.6 ± 0.7 nm and a regular twisting pitch
of 32 ± 4 nm (Figure F). Nanocoil lengths were several micrometers. To the best
of our knowledge, this is the first time that this nanocoil morphology,
which resembles a telephone cord, has ever been observed in peptide-based
materials. Although the term nanocoil has been used in other systems,[33−35] reported nanocoils are coiled flat ribbons, while those observed
for K resembled coiled cylindrical
nanofibers. Given the fully extended length of the molecule K (∼2.5 nm) and the amphiphilic
nature of the design, it is likely that these nanocoils have a core–shell
structure. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was applied to measure the
height (Figure S4) of the nanocoils (Figure G), indicating that
nanocoil heights were 21 ± 3 nm. This value is larger than the
thickness of two stacked nanocoils (∼12 nm), implying that
the nanocoils were rigid enough to preserve their morphology during
sample drying.To complement the findings from cryo-TEM and
AFM, we performed
small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) on K in aqueous solution (Figure H). The scattering pattern was fitted to
a helical nanostructure model,[36] and the
diameter and twisting pitch measurements from SAXS matched those observed
by imaging (Figure S7). To gain more insight
into the molecular requirements for nanocoil formation, we synthesized
two control molecules, EK and K (K represents
the oxygen-containing analogue of K; see Figure S1 for molecular structures). Only ill-defined
aggregates were observed for EK under the same assembly conditions (Figure S5), similar to reported observations for a peptide with a related
structure.[37] Bundled nanoribbons rather
than nanocoils were found for K (Figure S6), which indicates that the
nanocoil morphology is quite sensitive to molecular architecture.To understand the assembly differences among these PHDCs, we conducted
further experiments to evaluate their critical aggregation concentrations
(CACs) and to evaluate packing using multiple spectroscopic techniques.
CACs were measured using the Nile Red assay, a common method that
relies on the bright fluorescence of the dye when sequestered in a
hydrophobic environment. The CAC value for the three PHDCs ranged
from 19 to 36 μM (Figure S8 and Table S1). Next, we used circular dichroism (CD)
spectroscopy to assess the molecular packing of the self-assembled
PHDCs (Figure I–K).
The secondary structures of these nanoassemblies were different, but
all displayed strong signals both in the peptide region (190–240
nm) and in the SATO absorption region (300–360 nm), consistent
with SATO absorptions in the corresponding UV–vis spectra (Figure S9). Interestingly, while both K and K assembled into twisted ribbons, their secondary structures
were different on the basis of analysis of the peptide region in their
CD spectra. Specifically, K assemblies displayed α-helix secondary structures with a slight
red shift compared to a typical α-helix spectrum (Figure I), while K showed a CD spectrum resembling a β-sheet
structure (Figure J). The larger nanoribbon dimensions for PHDC K compared with K may be explained by the β-sheet component, which is
typically present in extended nanostructures. In sharp contrast, the
spectrum for K was consistent
with a random coil structure with some α-helix contribution
(Figure K). Taken
together, we conclude that the morphological differences between the
three PHCDs are rooted in their different constitutionally isomeric
sequences, which result in different secondary structures.We
next asked how supramolecular structure in the three constitutionally
isomeric PHDCs would affect their ability to release H2S, and ultimately their bioactivity. Given the amphiphilic nature
and the assembling ability of these PHDCs, we expected that assembly
into nanostructures would shield the SATO components from the external
environment, offering a potential mechanism for the controlled release
of H2S. The release profiles from the three PHDCs were
assessed by an H2S-selective microelectrode (Figure A–D and Figure S10). This method allows for real-time
monitoring of the concentration of H2S in solution but
does not measure cumulative release because H2S oxidizes
and volatilizes as it is generated. Thus, H2S release profiles
using this method of measurement are typically quantified using peaking
time, which is an approximate measure of relative release rates among
similar samples.
Figure 2
(A, C) H2S release profiles and corresponding
peaking
times of K, K, and K triggered by Cys in PBS (pH = 7.4) at room temperature (rt). Data
were collected on an H2S-sensitive electrochemical probe
from a solution (110 μL total) of PHDC (1 mM) and Cys (4 mM)
sealed in a well with a gas-permeable membrane inside a vial containing
PBS (5 mL). Error bars indicate standard deviation of three separate
experiments. (B, D) H2S release profiles and corresponding
peaking times for PHDCs from a solution of PHDC (40 μM) and
Cys (160 μM) in the sealed well. Error bars indicate standard
deviation of three separate experiments. (E) Schematic illustration
of the proposed release mechanism showing the effect of self-assembly
on the relative rates of reaction of the PHDCs with Cys to generate
H2S. *P < 0.05 for a comparison of
the groups indicated as determined by a one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) with a Student–Newman–Keuls comparisons posthoc
test (n = 3).
(A, C) H2S release profiles and corresponding
peaking
times of K, K, and K triggered by Cys in PBS (pH = 7.4) at room temperature (rt). Data
were collected on an H2S-sensitive electrochemical probe
from a solution (110 μL total) of PHDC (1 mM) and Cys (4 mM)
sealed in a well with a gas-permeable membrane inside a vial containing
PBS (5 mL). Error bars indicate standard deviation of three separate
experiments. (B, D) H2S release profiles and corresponding
peaking times for PHDCs from a solution of PHDC (40 μM) and
Cys (160 μM) in the sealed well. Error bars indicate standard
deviation of three separate experiments. (E) Schematic illustration
of the proposed release mechanism showing the effect of self-assembly
on the relative rates of reaction of the PHDCs with Cys to generate
H2S. *P < 0.05 for a comparison of
the groups indicated as determined by a one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) with a Student–Newman–Keuls comparisons posthoc
test (n = 3).H2S release was triggered by cysteine (Cys), which
is
a small biological thiol that has been used previously as a trigger
to release H2S from SATO-based materials.[38,39] As Cys also generates a response from the electrochemical probe,
we measured PHDC release profiles using a specially made vial that
contained an inner well with a volume of 120 μL, into which
PHDC and Cys (110 μL total) were added before quickly sealing
with a gas-permeable membrane. The experimental setup is shown in Figure S10. PBS solution (5 mL) was then added
to the vial above the level of the sealed inner well, and the electrochemical
probe was inserted into the outer PBS solution. PHDC solutions in
the inner well were held constant at 1 mM with 4 mM total Cys. All
three PHDCs exhibited steady H2S release over the course
of several hours (Figure A,B), while minimal H2S was detected from experimental
runs without Cys (Figure S11) and no H2S was detected from the control peptide K (Figure S12).While the H2S release profiles were similar for nanoribbon-forming
PHDCs K and K, nanocoil-forming PHDC K exhibited a different profile. Peaking times
for K and K were 143 ± 1 and 127 ± 7 min, respectively,
while that for K was significantly
longer at 182 ± 4 min (Figure C). Closer examination of the release profiles revealed
that, unlike the profiles for the nanoribbons (K and K), there was an initial period of 60 min for nanocoils (K) where H2S was slowly liberated;
after this point the release rate rose sharply. A UV absorption study
also showed a similar initial period of slow consumption of SATO groups
during H2S release (Figure S13). We attribute this initial period of slower release from K to slower diffusion of Cys into
the nanocoils compared with the nanoribbons. In order to confirm the
impact of supramolecular structure on release rate, we carried out
similar H2S release experiments with PHDC concentrations
of 40 μM in the inner well, where we expect the peptides to
exist more in their monomeric state than in the first experiments.
Despite the 25-fold dilution, peaking times were shorter at 40 μM
than at 1 mM (Figure D). These results are consistent with those from other drug-releasing
self-assembling peptides, where dilution enhances the release rate.[40] In these dilute release experiments, the release
profiles for all three PHDCs were nearly identical (Figure B), and there was no significant
difference in peaking time (Figure D, Table S2). These data
collectively highlight the effect of self-assembly on H2S release rate from PHDCs (Figure E).To gain more insight into how morphology
affects release of H2S from K nanocoils,
TEM was used to monitor the morphological transition during the course
of release. After addition of Cys, aliquots of K solution were removed at different time intervals
and drop-cast onto TEM grids (Figure ). At t = 0, just after addition of
Cys, the nanocoil morphology was unaffected (Stage 0). After incubation
for 45 min, the nanocoils began to fall apart (Stage 1), as indicated
by an increase in pitch from 26 ± 4 to 40 ± 8 nm. In earlier
work we found that addition of Cys to SATOs leads to H2S release along with the production of N-benzoyl-Cys
and an aldehyde;[41] in PHDCs this has the
effect of breaking the SATO group in half, leaving only a benzaldehyde
fragment on the Lys side chain. We speculate that, after Cys penetrates
into the nanostructures and reacts with SATO groups, the strength
of the hydrophobic and π–π interactions decreases,
leading to less compact molecular packing and loosened nanocoils.
Incubation for 90 min revealed a mixture of unwound nanocoils (highlighted
by red arrows in Figure C) and ill-defined aggregates (Stage 2). At this stage the supramolecular
structures had loosened considerably, enabling faster penetration
of Cys into the assemblies, which accelerated degradation of nanocoils
and dramatically increased the rate of the H2S release.
Finally, after 120 min incubation, only ill-defined aggregates were
observed (Stage 3). At this point in the process the rate of release
begins to peak, indicating that the poorly defined aggregates are
the most potent H2S-releasing morphology. On the basis
of these results, we conclude that slow H2S release from K results from its unique nanostructure,
which limits Cys access to the reactive SATO groups.
Figure 3
(A–D) TEM characterization
illustrates the morphological
transition of K during H2S release in the presence of Cys. The morphology study was
carried out with 1 mM K in
PBS with 4 mM Cys, and aliquots were removed at each time point, diluted,
and drop-cast onto TEM grids before staining with 2 wt % uranyl acetate.
(E) Schematic illustration of the observed morphological transition
during H2S release from K nanocoils.
(A–D) TEM characterization
illustrates the morphological
transition of K during H2S release in the presence of Cys. The morphology study was
carried out with 1 mM K in
PBS with 4 mM Cys, and aliquots were removed at each time point, diluted,
and drop-cast onto TEM grids before staining with 2 wt % uranyl acetate.
(E) Schematic illustration of the observed morphological transition
during H2S release from K nanocoils.Because PHDC K possessed
the longest H2S release peaking time, we next explored
its cardioprotective ability against toxicity induced by the common
cancer drug doxorubicin (Dox). As cardiotoxicity is dose-limiting
for Dox, reducing its deleterious effects on the heart may enable
more effective chemotherapy. H2S (as fast-releasing Na2S) promotes cardiomyocyte viability in the presence of Dox
by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress,[42,43] but this effect has not been tested on more practical slow-releasing
H2S donors. We and others have observed that slow-releasing
H2S donors can significantly enhance biological effects
compared to Na2S.[39,44] Thus, we envisioned
that K might be effective
in rescuing cardiomyocytes in the presence of Cys. First, we established
that K was nontoxic to H9C2
cardiomyocytes at concentrations up to 200 μM in the presence
of Cys (Figure S14). In contrast, Dox induced
cytotoxicity at concentrations as low as 2.5 μM (Figure A).
Figure 4
(A) Cell viability of
H9C2 cardiomyoctyes pretreated for 30 min
with a combination of K (200
μM) and Cys (800 μM) followed by exposure to Dox for another
24 h at varying concentrations. *p < 0.01 vs Dox
only. (B) Cell viability of H9C2 cardiomyoctyes pretreated with various
controls for 30 min before exposure to Dox (5 μM) for 24 h.
Control compound concentrations: Cys, 800 μM; K and K, 200 μM (400 μM in SATO); GYY4137 and Na2S, 400 μM. *p < 0.01 vs Dox group, #p < 0.01 vs Na2S group. (C) Cell viability
of H9C2 cardiomyoctyes pretreated with K, K, or K (200 μM) in the presence of Cys
(800 μM) for 30 min before exposure to Dox (5 μM) or without
Dox. **p < 0.01. Error bars indicate standard
deviation of three separate experiments. Group comparisons are indicated
as determined by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Student–Newman–Keuls
comparisons posthoc test.
(A) Cell viability of
H9C2 cardiomyoctyes pretreated for 30 min
with a combination of K (200
μM) and Cys (800 μM) followed by exposure to Dox for another
24 h at varying concentrations. *p < 0.01 vs Dox
only. (B) Cell viability of H9C2 cardiomyoctyes pretreated with various
controls for 30 min before exposure to Dox (5 μM) for 24 h.
Control compound concentrations: Cys, 800 μM; K and K, 200 μM (400 μM in SATO); GYY4137 and Na2S, 400 μM. *p < 0.01 vs Dox group, #p < 0.01 vs Na2S group. (C) Cell viability
of H9C2 cardiomyoctyes pretreated with K, K, or K (200 μM) in the presence of Cys
(800 μM) for 30 min before exposure to Dox (5 μM) or without
Dox. **p < 0.01. Error bars indicate standard
deviation of three separate experiments. Group comparisons are indicated
as determined by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Student–Newman–Keuls
comparisons posthoc test.In treatment studies, H9C2 cells were pretreated with K and Cys for 30 min.[42,45] Dox was then added without removing the K/Cys solution, and cells were then cultured for another
24 h before analyzing viability. Compared to the Dox only group, cell
viability increased significantly when cells were pretreated with K and Cys before exposure to Dox
(Figure A). To further
ensure that sustainable H2S release was responsible for
imparting protection to the cardiomyocytes in the presence of Dox,
several control studies were carried out (Figure B). Treatment with Cys alone showed no protective
effect, and treatment with a combination of the non-H2S-releasing
control peptide (K) and Cys
did not improve viability compared to Dox alone. We further compared K to sodium sulfide (Na2S), a fast-releasing H2Sdonor, and GYY4137, a slow-releasing
H2Sdonor, under the same experimental conditions. Na2S had a limited ability to rescue cells while GYY4137 had
no effect on viability. Interestingly, K was more effective at rescuing cells than Na2S, even while Na2S enhanced H9C2 proliferation in the
absence of Dox (Figure S14).Finally,
given the significant difference in H2S release
peaking time among nanocoils (K) and nanoribbons (K and K) (Figure C), we evaluated whether this behavior could
influence the cardioprotective capacity of these constitutionally
isomeric peptides. H9C2 cells were pretreated with PHDCs K, K, and K in the presence of
Cys, and viability was analyzed as before. In the absence of Dox,
no difference in cell viability between the three groups was observed
(left three columns in Figure C). In sharp contrast, K was significantly more effective in rescuing cells than K and K (right three columns in Figure C). We attribute this difference in bioactivity
to the differences in H2S release profiles, which are influenced
by the peptide nanostructures. Interestingly, none of three PHDCs
hindered the cytotoxicity of Dox toward MCF-7 breast cancer cells
(Figure S15B), indicating that these PHDCs
can be used as a powerful adjuvant to reduce the deleterious effect
of Dox on the heart. More broadly, these results highlight the importance
of controlling the release profile in H2S-based therapies
and demonstrate the power of this gas to initiate complex changes
in cell behavior.
Conclusions
The self-assembly and
bioactivity of the constitutionally isomeric
peptides described here reveal how subtle changes in amino acid sequence,
such as those employed by proteins, can be harnessed in short peptides
to dictate different biological outcomes. Additionally, the use of
reactive donor molecules as molecular building units in self-assembly
creates new opportunities for the development of biomaterials that
release H2S or related species. The ability of such materials
to release their chemically trapped payload (e.g., H2S),
disassemble, and undergo biodegradation is particularly exciting for
applications in regenerative medicine.
Authors: Jeffrey C Foster; Scott C Radzinski; Xianlin Zou; Carla V Finkielstein; John B Matson Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 4.939