Literature DB >> 30368108

Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making.

Ian Krajbich1.   

Abstract

When making decisions, people tend to shift their attention back and forth between stimuli, choosing options that they look at more overall and immediately before their responses. These relationships, and others, are well-described by sequential sampling models that assume that evidence for a given alternative is collected over time in proportion to its subjective value, amplified by attention. Furthermore, findings from a number of studies support a causal effect of attention on choice. This research is mostly focused on two-alternative forced choice, though some work has confirmed these relationships in multi-attribute and multi-alternative choice. Finally, we discuss recent interest in understanding what drives attention during the choice process, with findings suggesting that attention is drawn to noisier and more salient stimuli in two-alternative choice, as well as higher-value options in multi-alternative choice.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30368108     DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol        ISSN: 2352-250X


  9 in total

1.  How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making.

Authors:  Hongbo Yu; Jenifer Z Siegel; John A Clithero; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-03-16

2.  A Preferential Role for Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Assessing "the Value of the Whole" in Multiattribute Object Evaluation.

Authors:  Gabriel Pelletier; Nadav Aridan; Lesley K Fellows; Tom Schonberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Self-judgment dissected: A computational modeling analysis of self-referential processing and its relationship to trait mindfulness facets and depression symptoms.

Authors:  Peter F Hitchcock; Willoughby B Britton; Kahini P Mehta; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.526

4.  A Computational View on the Nature of Reward and Value in Anhedonia.

Authors:  Quentin J M Huys; Michael Browning
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

5.  Decision-Making in the Human-Machine Interface.

Authors:  J Benjamin Falandays; Samuel Spevack; Philip Pärnamets; Michael Spivey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-11

6.  Visual fixation patterns during economic choice reflect covert valuation processes that emerge with learning.

Authors:  Sean E Cavanagh; W M Nishantha Malalasekera; Bruno Miranda; Laurence T Hunt; Steven W Kennerley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Paying attention to attention in depression.

Authors:  Arielle S Keller; John E Leikauf; Bailey Holt-Gosselin; Brooke R Staveland; Leanne M Williams
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.

Authors:  Frederick Callaway; Antonio Rangel; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  A causal role for the right frontal eye fields in value comparison.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Andres Mitsumasu; Christian C Ruff; Ernst Fehr; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.