Literature DB >> 33643152

Decision-Making in the Human-Machine Interface.

J Benjamin Falandays1, Samuel Spevack2, Philip Pärnamets3,4, Michael Spivey1.   

Abstract

If our choices make us who we are, then what does that mean when these choices are made in the human-machine interface? Developing a clear understanding of how human decision making is influenced by automated systems in the environment is critical because, as human-machine interfaces and assistive robotics become even more ubiquitous in everyday life, many daily decisions will be an emergent result of the interactions between the human and the machine - not stemming solely from the human. For example, choices can be influenced by the relative locations and motor costs of the response options, as well as by the timing of the response prompts. In drift diffusion model simulations of response-prompt timing manipulations, we find that it is only relatively equibiased choices that will be successfully influenced by this kind of perturbation. However, with drift diffusion model simulations of motor cost manipulations, we find that even relatively biased choices can still show some influence of the perturbation. We report the results of a two-alternative forced-choice experiment with a computer mouse modified to have a subtle velocity bias in a pre-determined direction for each trial, inducing an increased motor cost to move the cursor away from the pre-designated target direction. With queries that have each been normed in advance to be equibiased in people's preferences, the participant will often begin their mouse movement before their cognitive choice has been finalized, and the directional bias in the mouse velocity exerts a small but significant influence on their final choice. With queries that are not equibiased, a similar influence is observed. By exploring the synergies that are developed between humans and machines and tracking their temporal dynamics, this work aims to provide insight into our evolving decisions.
Copyright © 2021 Falandays, Spevack, Pärnamets and Spivey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; drift diffusion; embodied cognition; eye tracking; mouse tracking

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643152      PMCID: PMC7905315          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  34 in total

1.  The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory.

Authors:  T Järvilehto
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec

2.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Eric Brown; Jeff Moehlis; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze.

Authors:  Philip Pärnamets; Petter Johansson; Lars Hall; Christian Balkenius; Michael J Spivey; Daniel C Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Power of Attention: Using Eye Gaze to Predict Other-Regarding and Moral Choices.

Authors:  Minou Ghaffari; Susann Fiedler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-10-08

7.  Perceptual but not complex moral judgments can be biased by exploiting the dynamics of eye-gaze.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-01-22

8.  Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation.

Authors:  Douglas D Garrett; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort; Niels A Kloosterman; Jan Willem de Gee; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Looking is buying. How visual attention and choice are affected by consumer preferences and properties of the supermarket shelf.

Authors:  Kerstin Gidlöf; Andrey Anikin; Martin Lingonblad; Annika Wallin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Keeping in touch with one's self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness.

Authors:  Jane E Aspell; Bigna Lenggenhager; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.