Literature DB >> 30366686

How Much Are We Spending on Resident Selection?

Aimee K Gardner1, Douglas S Smink2, Bradford G Scott3, James R Korndorffer4, David Harrington5, E Matthew Ritter6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rigorous selection processes are required to identify applicants who will be the best fit for training programs. This study provides a national snapshot of selection practices used within surgical residency programs and their associated financial costs.
METHODS: A 17-item online survey was distributed to General Surgery Program Directors (PDs) via the Association of Program Directors in Surgery listserv. The survey examined program characteristics, applicant pool size, and interview day components of the prior match year. PD/coordinator teams also provided hard costs associated with interview day components, as well as time and effort estimations among program faculty, residents, and staff during the past interview season. Effort estimates were translated to dollar values via national salary data reports of hourly wages for faculty and annual wages for administrative staff and residents. Descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance via SPSS 24.0 were used to examine the data.
RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-eight responses were received, reflecting 48% (128/267) of programs in the 2017 match. Average hard costs (±SD) were $8053 ± 6467, covering food ($3753 ± 4042), social sessions ($3175 ± 3749), supplies ($329 ± 866), hotel ($328 ± 1381), room reservations ($120 ± 658), shuttle fees ($84 ± 403), tour guide fees ($50 ± 379), and other ($146 + 824). Costs for personnel effort was $77,601 ± 62,413 for faculty, $12,393 ± 33,518 for residents, $6447 ± 11,107 for coordinators, and $1294 ± 1943 for staff. Total average cost associated with the interview process (hard + effort) was $100,438±87,919, with university-based programs ($128,686 ± 101,565) spending significantly more than independent-university affiliated ($61,162 ± 33,945), independent ($74,793 ± 73,261), and military ($62,495 ± 38,532) programs (p < 0.01). Average cost for each residency program per position being filled was $18,648 ± 13,383, and average cost per interviewee was $1221 ± 894.
CONCLUSIONS: In an era of declining resources for medical education, PDs must understand the time and effort associated with resident selection. These data reveal that residency programs are spending significant time and resources on the current selection process. Program leaders can use these data to assess their current selection strategies, review faculty and staff time allocation, and identify opportunities for making the process more efficient.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30366686     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  13 in total

1.  Should we use virtual simulators for surgical resident selection?

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Gregorio Di Franco; Andrea Moglia; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-01-03

2.  Virtual Surgical Fellowship Recruitment During COVID-19 and Its Implications for Resident/Fellow Recruitment in the Future.

Authors:  Charles C Vining; Oliver S Eng; Melissa E Hogg; Darryl Schuitevoerder; Rebecca S Silverman; Katharine A Yao; David J Winchester; Kevin K Roggin; Mark S Talamonti; Mitchell C Posner; Kiran K Turaga; Jennifer Tseng
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Zooming In Versus Flying Out: Virtual Residency Interviews in the Era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Mallory G Davis; Mary R C Haas; Michael Gottlieb; Joseph B House; Rob D Huang; Laura R Hopson
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-06-27

4.  Reforming the Match: A Proposal for a New 3-Phase System.

Authors:  Joseph G Monir
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-02

5.  Virtual Interviews in Postgraduate Medical Education Recruitment: Is There a Future Post-Pandemic?

Authors:  Luckshi Rajendran; Ashlie Nadler
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-08

6.  Using structured interviews to reduce bias in emergency medicine residency recruitment: Worth a second look.

Authors:  Rebecca H Hughes; Sarah Kleinschmidt; Alexander Y Sheng
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-09-01

Review 7.  Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryley K Zastrow; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Daniel A London
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

8.  Time and Financial Costs for Students Participating in the National Residency Matching Program (the Match©): 2015 to 2020.

Authors:  Kari M Nilsen; Anne Walling; Jill Grothusen; Gretchen Irwin; Mark Meyer; Greg Unruh
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2021-03-19

Review 9.  Is the changing landscape of fellowship recruitment during COVID-19 here to stay?

Authors:  Shreya Gupta; L Grier Arthur; Nicole Chandler; Paul Danielson; Cynthia Downard; Peter Ehrlich; Barbara Gaines; Brian Gray; Patrick Javid; Michel Lallier; Benedict Nwomeh; Edward Tagge; Richard Weiss; KuoJen Tsao; Aaron P Garrison; Grace Mak
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Direct Comparison of In-Person Versus Virtual Interviews for Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Monica M Grova; Sean J Donohue; Michael O Meyers; Hong Jin Kim; David W Ollila
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.