Literature DB >> 30365901

Comparative analysis of swallowtail transcriptomes suggests molecular determinants for speciation and adaptation.

Qian Cong1, Nick V Grishin1,2.   

Abstract

Genetic determinants of speciation in closely related species are poorly understood. We sequenced and analyzed transcriptomes of swallowtail butterflies Heraclides cresphontes (northeastern species) and Heraclides rumiko (southwestern species), a pair of mostly allopatric sister species whose distribution ranges overlap narrowly in central Texas. We found that the two swallowtails confidently differ (FST > 0.5 for both species) in about 5% of genes, similarly to the divergence in another pair of swallowtail species Pterourus glaucus (southern species) and Pterourus canadensis (northern species). The same genes tend to diverge in both species pairs, suggesting similar speciation paths in Heraclides and Pterourus. The most significant differences for both species pairs were found in the circadian clock genes that were conserved within each species and diverged strongly between species (P-value < 0.01 and FST > 0.7). This divergence implied that adaptations to different climates and photoperiod at different latitudes or differences in mating behavior, including mating time and copulation duration, may be possible factors in ecological or behavioral-based speciation. Finally, we suggest several nuclear DNA regions that consistently and prominently differ between the sister swallowtail species as nuclear barcodes for swallowtail identification, with the best barcode being an exon from the protein TIMELESS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity; biodiversité; cryptic species; eclosion rhythm; ecological speciation; espèces cryptiques; evolutionary genomics; génomique évolutive; rythme d’éclosion; spéciation adaptative

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30365901      PMCID: PMC8934176          DOI: 10.1139/gen-2018-0084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome        ISSN: 0831-2796            Impact factor:   2.166


  41 in total

Review 1.  Speciation genes in plants.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; Benjamin K Blackman
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  An antennal circadian clock and circadian rhythms in peripheral pheromone reception in the moth Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Christine Merlin; Philippe Lucas; Didier Rochat; Marie-Christine François; Martine Maïbèche-Coisne; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.182

3.  A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination.

Authors:  Trevor C Bruen; Hervé Philippe; David Bryant
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae).

Authors:  T L Whitworth; R D Dawson; H Magalon; E Baudry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genomic islands of differentiation between house mouse subspecies.

Authors:  Bettina Harr
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities.

Authors:  H A Orr; M Turelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Skipper genome sheds light on unique phenotypic traits and phylogeny.

Authors:  Qian Cong; Dominika Borek; Zbyszek Otwinowski; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Genome-wide characterization of adaptation and speciation in tiger swallowtail butterflies using de novo transcriptome assemblies.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Krushnamegh Kunte; Marcus R Kronforst
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Thomas L Turner; Matthew W Hahn; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.