Literature DB >> 17472911

DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae).

T L Whitworth1, R D Dawson, H Magalon, E Baudry.   

Abstract

In DNA barcoding, a short standardized DNA sequence is used to assign unknown individuals to species and aid in the discovery of new species. A fragment of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 is emerging as the standard barcode region for animals. However, patterns of mitochondrial variability can be confounded by the spread of maternally transmitted bacteria that cosegregate with mitochondria. Here, we investigated the performance of barcoding in a sample comprising 12 species of the blow fly genus Protocalliphora, known to be infected with the endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia. We found that the barcoding approach showed very limited success: assignment of unknown individuals to species is impossible for 60% of the species, while using the technique to identify new species would underestimate the species number in the genus by 75%. This very low success of the barcoding approach is due to the non-monophyly of many of the species at the mitochondrial level. We even observed individuals from four different species with identical barcodes, which is, to our knowledge, the most extensive case of mtDNA haplotype sharing yet described. The pattern of Wolbachia infection strongly suggests that the lack of within-species monophyly results from introgressive hybridization associated with Wolbachia infection. Given that Wolbachia is known to infect between 15 and 75% of insect species, we conclude that identification at the species level based on mitochondrial sequence might not be possible for many insects. However, given that Wolbachia-associated mtDNA introgression is probably limited to very closely related species, identification at the genus level should remain possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17472911      PMCID: PMC2493573          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  43 in total

1.  Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding.

Authors:  Daniel H Janzen; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; John M Burns; Winnie Hallwachs; Ed Remigio; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  DNA barcoding a useful tool for taxonomists.

Authors:  David E Schindel; Scott E Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals.

Authors:  Eric Bazin; Sylvain Glémin; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation.

Authors:  Daniel Rubinoff
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  P Vos; R Hogers; M Bleeker; M Reijans; T van de Lee; M Hornes; A Frijters; J Pot; J Peleman; M Kuiper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Estimation of DNA sequence divergence from comparison of restriction endonuclease digests.

Authors:  W B Upholt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Multilocus sequence typing system for the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis.

Authors:  Laura Baldo; Julie C Dunning Hotopp; Keith A Jolley; Seth R Bordenstein; Sarah A Biber; Rhitoban Ray Choudhury; Cheryl Hayashi; Martin C J Maiden; Hervè Tettelin; John H Werren
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  DNA barcoding Australia's fish species.

Authors:  Robert D Ward; Tyler S Zemlak; Bronwyn H Innes; Peter R Last; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty-three arthropod species.

Authors:  A Jeyaprakash; M A Hoy
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.585

View more
  74 in total

1.  Complete DNA barcode reference library for a country's butterfly fauna reveals high performance for temperate Europe.

Authors:  Vlad Dinca; Evgeny V Zakharov; Paul D N Hebert; Roger Vila
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Species discrimination in the subfamily Ostertagiinae of Northern China: assessment of DNA barcode in a taxonomically challenging group.

Authors:  Jizhou Lv; Yongning Zhang; Chunyan Feng; Xiangfen Yuan; Degang Sun; Junhua Deng; Caixia Wang; Shaoqiang Wu; Xiangmei Lin
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Using COI gene sequence to barcode two morphologically alike species: the cotton bollworm and the oriental tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Qing-Qing Li; Di-Yan Li; Hui Ye; Xiao-Fei Liu; Wei Shi; Neng Cao; Yan-Qing Duan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics.

Authors:  E A Alacs; A Georges; N N FitzSimmons; J Robertson
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Identification of forensically important blowfly species (Diptera: Calliphoridae) by high-resolution melting PCR analysis.

Authors:  Tadeusz Malewski; Agnieszka Draber-Mońko; Jan Pomorski; Marta Łoś; Wiesław Bogdanowicz
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified.

Authors:  Hojun Song; Jennifer E Buhay; Michael F Whiting; Keith A Crandall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies.

Authors:  Marianne Elias; Ryan I Hill; Keith R Willmott; Kanchon K Dasmahapatra; Andrew V Z Brower; James Mallet; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders.

Authors:  Massimiliano Virgilio; Thierry Backeljau; Bruno Nevado; Marc De Meyer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  DNA barcode analysis: a comparison of phylogenetic and statistical classification methods.

Authors:  Frederic Austerlitz; Olivier David; Brigitte Schaeffer; Kevin Bleakley; Madalina Olteanu; Raphael Leblois; Michel Veuille; Catherine Laredo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.