Literature DB >> 30365510

Copy number variations and founder effect underlying complete IL-10Rβ deficiency in Portuguese kindreds.

Fabienne Charbit-Henrion1,2,3,4, Bernadette Bègue1,2,4, Anaïs Sierra1,2,4, Sylvain Hanein2,5, Marie-Claude Stolzenberg2,6, Zhi Li7, Sandra Pellegrini7, Nicolas Garcelon2,8, Marc Jeanpierre2,9, Bénédicte Neven2,6,10, Isabelle Loge11, Capucine Picard2,12, Jérémie Rosain2,12,13, Jacinta Bustamante2,12,13,14, Marc Le Lorc'h15, Bénédicte Pigneur1,2,3,4, Alicia Fernandes16, Frédéric Rieux-Laucat2,6, Jorge Amil Dias4,17, Frank M Ruemmele1,2,3,4, Nadine Cerf-Bensussan1,2,4.   

Abstract

Mutations in interleukin-10 receptor (IL-10R) genes are one cause of very early-onset inflammatory bowel disease with perianal lesions, which can be cured by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Using a functional test, which assesses responsiveness of peripheral monocytes to IL-10, we identified three unrelated Portuguese patients carrying two novel IL-10RB mutations. In the three patients, sequencing of genomic DNA identified the same large deletion of exon 3 which precluded protein expression. This mutation was homozygous in two patients born from consanguineous families and heterozygous in the third patient born from unrelated parents. Microsatellite analysis of the IL10RB genomic region revealed a common haplotype in the three Portuguese families pointing to a founder deletion inherited from a common ancestor 400 years ago. In the third patient, surface expression of IL-10R was normal but signaling in response to IL-10 was impaired. Complementary DNA sequencing and next-generation sequencing of IL10RB locus with custom-made probes revealed a ≈ 6 Kb duplication encompassing the exon 6 which leads to a frameshift mutation and a loss of the TYK2-interacting Box 2 motif. Altogether, we describe two novel copy number variations in IL10RB, one with founder effect and one preserving cell surface expression but abolishing signaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30365510      PMCID: PMC6203366          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Mendelian bi-allelic loss-of-function mutations in the IL10RA, IL10RB, IL10B genes encoding the two chains of IL-10R or IL-10 respectively have been reported in approximately 100 children since 2009 [1-11]. Affected children typically develop severe colitis, perianal lesions and folliculitis within the first weeks or months of life. Refractoriness to immunosuppressive therapies is usual and can lead to colectomy. Early genetic diagnosis is necessary to perform hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) which can cure the disease, avoid colectomy and also prevent the high risk of B cell lymphoma associated with this condition [12]. Interleukin 10 (IL-10) plays a central role in intestinal mucosal homeostasis via a direct regulatory effect on intestinal macrophages [13,14]. Using a functional test, which assesses the inhibitory effect of IL-10 on the production of inflammatory cytokines by peripheral monocytes [1], we identified three unrelated Portuguese patients carrying two novel IL10RB mutations. One mutation consisted in a large deletion of exon 3, which abolished protein expression. It was shared by the three patients and a founder effect could be demonstrated. The other mutation identified in one patient was a heterozygous ≈ 6 Kb duplication comprising the exon 6 that preserved IL-10Rβ surface expression but abolished TYK2 phosphorylation and downstream STAT3 and STAT1 signaling.

Material and methods

Patients

Patients were included in each center after obtaining informed written consent for functional and genetic studies from both parents. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes, Ile-de-France II, 2009–155).

Functional studies

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated on Ficoll Hypaque, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-cell lines were obtained according to standard procedures. Production of IL-8 by PBMC stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) in the presence of IL-10 (RD systems, Lille, France) was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Human CXCL8/IL-8 Duo Set Kit, R&D systems) as described [1]. To analyze IL-10Rβ expression, 2.105 PBMC were stained at 4°C for 30 minutes with PE-labelled anti-IL-10Rβ antibody, or IgG1 isotype (R&D systems), and CD45-APC, -CD3-PeCy7, -CD19-horizon V450 (BD Bioscience, Rungis, France) and -CD14-FITC (Milteny, Paris) antibodies. To analyze STAT3 phosphorylation, 1x106 PBMC were stimulated with 25 ng/mL IL-6 or IL-10 (R&D systems) and surface-stained with the same antibody cocktail. After fixation and permeation, cells were labelled with anti-phosphorylated STAT3 antibody according to manufacturer’s instructions (BD Bioscience). Cells were analyzed on CANTO II (BD Biosciences) using the FlowJO software (TreeStar Inc, Ashland, Ore). To study TYK 2 phosphorylation, EBV cell lines were stimulated with 25 ng/mL IL-10 or IL-6 or with 100 pM IFNα for 15 minutes. Protein extracts (40 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with the indicated antibodies as in [15]. Anti-STAT1 antibody was from Millipore, anti-STAT3, anti-STAT1-P-Y701, anti-STAT3-P-Y705 and anti-TYK2-phospho-YY1054/55 were all from Cell Signaling Technology. To measure TYK2 content the in-house TYK2 monoclonal antibody (T10-2, Hybridolab, Institut Pasteur) was used.

Genetic analyses

Genomic DNA and RNA were extracted from PBMC with QIAmp DNA Blood Mini Kit and RNA Extraction Mini kit respectively (QIAGEN, Courtaboeuf, France). cDNA was obtained with QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN). Each exon of IL10RA (NM_001558) and IL10RB (NM_000628) was amplified from genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described [3]. For analysis of the exon 3 deletion of IL10RB, genomic DNA was amplified using two primers located in introns 2 and 3, respectively (forward: 5’-TAAACAGATGTGCCGTCCTC-3’; reverse: 5’-TGAGATAAGACTTCACTCTGGTCA-3’). For analyzing exon 6 duplication, IL10RB cDNA was amplified using two primers located in exons 4 and 7 (forward: 5’-CCCCCTGGAATGCAAGTAGA-3’; reverse: 5’-ACAAGGGCCAAGACCATCT-3’). PCR products were purified with the QIAquick kit (QIAGEN) and Sanger sequenced on a Genetic Analyzer 3500XL (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Segregation analysis of microsatellite markers that contain short tracks of dinucleotide repeats and flanking the IL10RB gene were performed using fluorescent primers. The polymorphic markers chosen from the Genethon Linkage Map [16] were: Primers sequences are available at the Working Draft of the Human Genome available at UCSC, Human Assembly (GRCh37/hg19). Amplified fragments were electrophoresed on a ABI PRISM 3500XL DNA Analyzer and analyzed using the GeneMapper Software 5 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Heterozygote frequency and the size range of alleles for each microsatellite marker were available at the Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (http://www.cephb.fr/cephdb/browser.php). To further analyze the exon 6 duplication, we performed high-throughput sequencing of the entire IL10RB locus of the family 3 as described [17]. Briefly, genomic DNA (1 to 3 μg) from each individual was mechanically fragmented to a median size of 200 bp with a Covaris S2 Ultrasonicator. Double-stranded fragmented DNA (100 ng) was end-repaired, and adaptors containing a specific eight-base barcode were ligated to the repaired ends (one specific barcode per patient). DNA fragments were amplified by PCR to obtain final precapture barcoded libraries that were pooled at equimolar concentrations. Capture was performed with SureSelect reagents (Agilent), 750 ng of the pool of precapture libraries and home-made biotinylated probes obtained from bacterial artificial chromosome as a template. The single-stranded biotinylated DNA probes were designed to cover a ≈ 150 kb chromosomal region encompassing the IL10RB gene on chromosome 21 (chr21:34,638,665–34,669,539) according to the February 2009 human reference sequence (GRCh37hg19). During capture, barcoded library molecules complementary to the biotinylated beads were retained on streptavidin-coated magnetic beads and amplified by PCR to generate a final pool of postcapture libraries covering the targeted region. A pool of libraries (3 DNA samples from P3 and both parents and 1 from healthy control) covering a ≈150 kb region including the entire IL10RB gene was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 (paired-end sequencing 130x130 bases, high-throughput mode). Sequences were aligned with the GRCh37hg19 human genome with Burrows-Wheeler Aligner version 0.6.2.13 [18]. Copy number variations (CNVs) were analyzed as previously described [19]. For precise analyses of breakpoint, regions were analyzed for the presence of repetitive elements using the RepeatMasker track (http://www.repeatmasker.org/) in the UCSC genome browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu/) [20].

Results

Description of the patients

Patients 1, 2 and 3 (P1, P2, P3) were born to three distinct Portuguese families, P1 and P2 to two consanguineous families while P3 was born from unrelated parents. The three patients presented with diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and perianal lesions since the age of 4 to 9 months. P1 also had severe chronic folliculitis. At diagnosis, endoscopy showed left colonic inflammation (P2) or pancolitis (P1 and P3). P1 was temporarily improved by ileostomy (S1 Table). This clinical phenotype was strongly suggestive of a defect in IL-10 signaling. The lack of inhibition by exogenous IL-10 of IL-8 production by PBMC stimulated by liposaccharide (LPS) further suggested mutations in the IL-10 receptor genes (Fig 1A).
Fig 1

Patients from Portugal share a common deletion of exon 3 in IL10RB.

1A: Lack of responsiveness to IL-10 in PBMC stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in Patient 3 compared to one control. IL-8 was quantified by ELISA in supernatants after a 24 hour-stimulation at the indicated concentrations of LPS and IL-10. Results were comparable in all three patients. 1B: Scheme showing the exon 3 deletion as defined by Sanger analysis. Genomic positions of breakpoints are shown by square brackets. 1C: Gel analysis of PCR products from genomic DNA with primers flanking the deletion showing the normal 3.5 kb band in control, parents and P3 and a short 0.5 kb mutated band in patients, parents of P1 and P2 and mother of P3.

Patients from Portugal share a common deletion of exon 3 in IL10RB.

1A: Lack of responsiveness to IL-10 in PBMC stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in Patient 3 compared to one control. IL-8 was quantified by ELISA in supernatants after a 24 hour-stimulation at the indicated concentrations of LPS and IL-10. Results were comparable in all three patients. 1B: Scheme showing the exon 3 deletion as defined by Sanger analysis. Genomic positions of breakpoints are shown by square brackets. 1C: Gel analysis of PCR products from genomic DNA with primers flanking the deletion showing the normal 3.5 kb band in control, parents and P3 and a short 0.5 kb mutated band in patients, parents of P1 and P2 and mother of P3.

Identification of exon 3 deletion in IL10RB as a founder mutation

The receptor for IL-10 is a heterotetramer complex comprising two alpha chains encoded by IL10RA and two beta chains encoded by IL10RB [8]. In the three patients, genomic DNA sequencing did not reveal any mutation in IL10RA but pointed out an identical large deletion in IL10RB encompassing exon 3 in P1 and P2. Exon 3 deletion (delE3) was homozygous in P1 and P2 but heterozygous in P3. Sanger sequencing showed the loss of 2979 base pairs (bp) and the insertion of 2 bp (c.174-1467_331+1354delinsCT, g.34647434_34650412delinsCT, according to the HGVS v2.0 Nomenclature) (Fig 1B). Accordingly, the expected 3.5 kb band encompassing exon 3 and the flanking intronic regions were replaced in P1 and P2 by a 0.5 kb band carrying the deletion while P3 displayed both the 3.5 kb band and the abnormal 0.5 kb (Fig 1C). The parents of P1 and P2 and the mother of P3 displayed the two bands, indicating that they were heterozygous carriers of the deletion. Exon 3 skipping was predicted to result in a frameshift, which introduces an early-stop codon in exon 4 (p.Tyr59Hisfs*14). In order to assess the role of genomic architecture in the mechanism of the large deletion of exon 3, we searched for known repetitive elements intersecting with the breakpoints. Breakpoints were localized respectively in a Tigger1 element (TcMar-Tigger family; DNA repeat element) in intron 2 (chr21:34,647,433) and in an AluJb/AluSx3 element (Alu family; short interspersed nuclear element / SINE) in intron 3 (chr21:34,650,413) (S1 Fig). Both are DNA repeat elements but they do not belong to the same family. Given the lack of homology and junctional microhomology and the 2 bp insertion, we suggest that the deletion of exon 3 may have been caused by non-homologous end-joining [21]. Of note, this deletion is described neither in DGV (http://dgv.tcag.ca/gb2/gbrowse/dgv2_hg19/?name=id:3146657;dbid=gene:database) [22], nor in gnomAD databases (www.gnomad.broadinstitute.org) [23]. The observation of the same large deletion in three unrelated Portuguese patients led us to suspect a founder effect. In keeping with this hypothesis, segregation analysis of microsatellite markers flanking IL10RB revealed a common haplotype from loci D21S262 to D21S1254 in all individuals carrying the delE3 (Table 1 and S2 Fig). Calculation of the putative age of the mutation was performed as described [24]. Assuming a linear mapping of 1.4 cM/Mb and given imprecision of the boundaries of presumably identical by descent sequences, time to a common ancestor was rounded to the nearest number of generations, giving a skewed distribution of 10–25 generations, with 15 as the mean. The size of the smallest region of homology was next used as a check on unrealistic calculations [24]. Assuming a star genealogy, in a naive bayesian framework, the sum of all branches given by algebraic expressions is 3/zx, with zx the size of the shortest region shared by all haplotypes. Supposing a shortest region of 3.5 cM, with these simplified assumptions, a comparable figure of 17 generations was obtained, overall suggesting that the mutation may have appeared approximately 400 years ago.
Table 1

Haplotypes analyses of the markers flanking the IL10RB gene.

IL10RB chr21:34,638,665–34,669,539
CentromereD21S2690.98 MbD21S19163,24MbD21S2630,03MbD21S 19080,6MbD21S 18880,96MbD21S 2620,8MbD21S 1898 9D21S 12541,28MbD21S 18951,47MbD21S 1252Telomere
P1Allele 1251244175216271148233delE3264266249
Allele 2251242175216273148233delE3264270231
P2Allele 1241242175216277148233delE3264266247
Allele 2251242175216277148233delE3264266249
P3Allele 1243244201218271148233delE3264274239
Allele 2243248199218271148215duplE6268262231

Haplotypes reconstruction for informative microsatellite markers on chromosome 21q21.3-q22.12 of P1-3. Chromosomal start positions of each microsatellite markers are indicated in base pair (bp) according to the Human genome working draft sequence available from the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC, Human Assembly feb.2009 GRCh37/hg19). Physical distances in mega bases (Mb) between each marker are in red. D21S269 = AFM263XF5, 28.001.125bp; D21S1916 = AFMA052TC5, 28.981.056bp; D21S263 = AFM211ZG9, 32.221.915bp; D21S1908 = AFMC016YG9, 32.242.924bp; D21S1888 = AFMA218WB1, 32.854.278bp; D21S262 = AFM198TC5, 33.816.266bp; D21S1898 = AFMB308XE5, 34.609.209bp; D21S 1254 = AFM276ZA5, 35.075.320bp; D21S1895 = AFMB280XD9, 36.350.985bp; D21S1252 = AFM261ZG1, 37.826.859bp. Patient (P), Deletion of exon 3 of IL10RB (delE3), duplication of exon 6 (duplE6), and wild type allele (WT). Allele 1; maternal allele, Allele 2, paternal allele (see S2 Fig). Homozygous haplotypes are highlighted in grey and the common haplotype with the disease in the three families is framed.

Haplotypes reconstruction for informative microsatellite markers on chromosome 21q21.3-q22.12 of P1-3. Chromosomal start positions of each microsatellite markers are indicated in base pair (bp) according to the Human genome working draft sequence available from the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC, Human Assembly feb.2009 GRCh37/hg19). Physical distances in mega bases (Mb) between each marker are in red. D21S269 = AFM263XF5, 28.001.125bp; D21S1916 = AFMA052TC5, 28.981.056bp; D21S263 = AFM211ZG9, 32.221.915bp; D21S1908 = AFMC016YG9, 32.242.924bp; D21S1888 = AFMA218WB1, 32.854.278bp; D21S262 = AFM198TC5, 33.816.266bp; D21S1898 = AFMB308XE5, 34.609.209bp; D21S 1254 = AFM276ZA5, 35.075.320bp; D21S1895 = AFMB280XD9, 36.350.985bp; D21S1252 = AFM261ZG1, 37.826.859bp. Patient (P), Deletion of exon 3 of IL10RB (delE3), duplication of exon 6 (duplE6), and wild type allele (WT). Allele 1; maternal allele, Allele 2, paternal allele (see S2 Fig). Homozygous haplotypes are highlighted in grey and the common haplotype with the disease in the three families is framed.

Identification of heterozygous exon 6 duplication in IL10RB impairing signaling but not protein expression

In P3, sequencing all exons of IL10RB on genomic DNA failed to reveal a second mutation. Moreover, flow cytometry revealed normal IL-10Rβ expression on PBMC (Fig 2A). These results contrasted with the lack of inhibition of IL-8 monocyte production by IL-10 (Fig 1A) and with the lack of STAT3 phosphorylation in P3’s PBMC stimulated with exogenous IL-10 while STAT3 phosphorylation was normal in response to IL-6 (Fig 2B). In order to identify the putative second mutation, sequence analysis of IL10RB was next performed on the cDNA from P3’s PBMC and both parents. Sanger sequencing of the PCR product amplified from P3’s cDNA with primers located in exons 4 and 7 revealed a heterozygous duplication of exon 6 (duplE6) (S3 Fig). This duplication was carried by the paternal allele (as shown by microsatellite analysis, data available on request). Unexpectedly it was detected in P3’s cDNA but not in her father’s cDNA. Long-range PCR on genomic DNA from P3 and her father using primers located in introns 5 and 7 failed to reveal the duplE6 (data not shown). We therefore performed next-generation sequencing of the entire IL10RB locus using custom made biotinylated probes on DNA from P3, both parents and one healthy wild-type control. Using both coverage and alignment NGS data, and in keeping with the result of the sequencing of P3’s cDNA, we identified a large insertion of ≈ 6 Kb encompassing the exon 6, which was present in P3 but also in her father (Part A in S5 Fig). In addition, our TNGS approach confirmed that P3 and her mother harbor the heterozygous delE3 (Part B in S5 Fig). DuplE6 could be localized approximately between breakpoints (chr21:34,657,300–34,657,450) in intron 5 and in intron 6 (chr21:34,663,650–34,663,870) (S4 Fig). Both breakpoints are localized in an AluSx1 repetitive element (Alu family; short interspersed nuclear element / SINE). Yet, their exact positions could not be determined precisely using either long-range PCR or PCR with primers framing the two breakpoints. Of note, duplE6 is described neither in DGV nor in gnomAD databases [22,23].
Fig 2

Duplication of IL10RB exon 6 results in loss of exon 7 encoded intracellular domain and prevents TYK2 activation.

2A: Flow cytometry analysis showing normal cell surface expression of IL-10Rβ in PBMC of P3 (gated on CD14+ cells). 2B: Flow cytometry analysis comparing STAT3 phosphorylation in response to IL-6 and IL-10 in PBMC of P3 and healthy control (gated on CD3+ cells). These data are representative of two independent experiments. 2C: Amino acid sequence of wild type IL-10Rβ and of the IL-10Rβ duplE6. In red, the aberrant 50 amino acid peptide resulting from the frameshift caused by the duplication of exon 6. Highlighted in yellow are residues conserved in IFNAR1, another TYK2-interacting cytokine receptor. 2D: Schematic representation of the two novel IL10RB mutations.

Duplication of IL10RB exon 6 results in loss of exon 7 encoded intracellular domain and prevents TYK2 activation.

2A: Flow cytometry analysis showing normal cell surface expression of IL-10Rβ in PBMC of P3 (gated on CD14+ cells). 2B: Flow cytometry analysis comparing STAT3 phosphorylation in response to IL-6 and IL-10 in PBMC of P3 and healthy control (gated on CD3+ cells). These data are representative of two independent experiments. 2C: Amino acid sequence of wild type IL-10Rβ and of the IL-10Rβ duplE6. In red, the aberrant 50 amino acid peptide resulting from the frameshift caused by the duplication of exon 6. Highlighted in yellow are residues conserved in IFNAR1, another TYK2-interacting cytokine receptor. 2D: Schematic representation of the two novel IL10RB mutations. The consequence of duplE6 is a frameshift at the end of the first exon 6, which precludes translation of exon 7 and results in an aberrant sequence of 50 amino acids (Fig 2C). Accordingly, the mutated IL-10Rβ protein has intact extracellular and transmembrane domains, allowing expression at the cell surface (Fig 2A). However, the cytoplasmic domain is expected to contain the exon 6-encoded region (53 aa) followed by the aberrant C-terminal peptide (50 aa) (Fig 2C and 2D). In the IL-10R complex, α and β chains are associated with two tyrosine kinases, JAK1 and TYK2 respectively. Binding of IL-10 to the receptor complex results in trans-phosphorylation of JAK1 and TYK2, recruitment and phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT3 and to a lesser extent of STAT1 [25]. We analyzed signaling events in EBV-B cells derived from P3 and her parents. Cells were stimulated in parallel with IL-6 and IL-10 for 15 min and proteins were analyzed by western blot (Fig 3). Phosphorylation of TYK2, STAT1 and STAT3 in response to IL-6 was comparable in the three cell lines. On the other hand, phosphorylation of these proteins in response to IL-10 was undetectable in P3-derived cells (Fig 3). Of note, the latter cells expressed slightly lower levels of STAT3.
Fig 3

Lack of TYK2, STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation in P3’s EBV-B cells in response to IL-10.

Western blot analysis of TYK2, STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation in EBV-B cells from P3 and her parents stimulated for 15 min with IL-6 or IL-10 (25 ng/ml). ns, non-stimulated. F, father. M, mother. Two gels were run in parallel with the same lysates. These data are representative of two independent experiments.

Lack of TYK2, STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation in P3’s EBV-B cells in response to IL-10.

Western blot analysis of TYK2, STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation in EBV-B cells from P3 and her parents stimulated for 15 min with IL-6 or IL-10 (25 ng/ml). ns, non-stimulated. F, father. M, mother. Two gels were run in parallel with the same lysates. These data are representative of two independent experiments.

Discussion

We report here three patients originating from Portugal with autosomal recessive complete IL-10Rβ deficiency. The combination of functional tests and genetic studies allowed us to describe two novel IL10RB copy number variations (CNV). One is a deletion and the first described founder IL10RB mutation; the second is a duplication preserving cell surface expression but abolishing downstream signaling. To our knowledge, 23 patients have been reported in the literature with IL10RB mutations and CNV have been rarely identified. Only two patients carried CNV mutations. One was described by Pigneur et al (P5) and displayed a deletion of exon 2 [6]; the second was described by Kotlarz et al (P16) and carried a large deletion encompassing exons 4 to 7 (c.331+907_574del; [5]). No duplication has been reported so far. With the three patients reported here, deletion and duplication rates in IL10RB reach 19% (5/26) and 3.8% (1/26) respectively, with an overall rate of CNV of 23%. Thus, CNV rate in IL10RB (6/26, 23%) is higher than in the human genome (deletion: 7.5%; duplication: 3.9% and overall rate of CNV: 9.5%; [26]). This excess of CNV in the IL10RB locus may be due, at least partially, to its enrichment in Alu elements (24% of Alu elements versus 10% in the human genome [27]). Interestingly, the same deletion of exon 3 was identified in three unrelated families, all originating from the same geographic origin. Even though IL10RB locus seems to be enriched in Alu-elements, the two delE3 breakpoints were non-homologous, reducing the probability that delE3 resulted from a recurrent rearrangement [21,28]. Furthermore, delE3 was absent from DGV and gnomAD databases. Altogether these data suggested that delE3 might be inherited from a common ancestor. In keeping with this hypothesis, all individuals carrying the delE3 shared a common haplotype from loci D21S262 to D21S1254, a length compatible with an appearance approximately 400 years ago. To the best of our knowledge, delE3 is the first description of a mutation in IL10RB or IL10RA shared by a particular population. Our observations in P3 illustrate difficulties in characterizing large CNV, and notably large duplications. Their identification requires combining several methods [21]. Thus, in P3, the large ≈ 6 Kb duplication encompassing exon 6 was not detected by Sanger sequencing of the genomic DNA but could only be identified by sequencing of the cDNA. Unexpectedly however, RT-PCR repeatedly failed to amplify the duplicated allele in P3’s father, suggesting a possible competition between the normal and duplicated allele. Overall, the duplication was best characterized using TNGS of the entire IL10RB locus captured with custom-made primers. TNGS, thanks to much higher coverage of each captured region of interest, emerges now as a powerful tool to identify CNV [27,29]. Of note, duplE6 could be easily detected using targeted sequencing of a panel covering the exons of IL10RB [29]. It is likely that P3 cells fail to respond to IL-10 due to the inability of the duplE6 mutant receptor chain to bind TYK2. In recent structural studies, Lupardus and coll. identified residues in other cytokine receptors that are critical for binding TYK2 and map in the so-called Box2 motif [30]. Inspection of the duplE6 cytoplasmic domain is consistent with the loss of Box 2, which in the WT IL-10Rβ is encoded by exon 7 (Fig 2C). Our data therefore suggest that the segment encoded by exon 7 is indispensable for signaling. Mutations preserving surface expression of IL-10R are uncommon and have been described only for IL10RA in two patients [31,32]. DuplE6 described here is the first example of a mutation preserving IL-10Rβ cell surface expression but impairing IL-10 signaling. In conclusion, our results provide the first description of a founder IL10RB mutation. While its exact frequency in the Portuguese population remains to be assessed, it may increase the risk of IL-10Rβ deficiency either due to homozygous delE3 or to the combination of delE3 with a compound IL10RB mutation as observed in P3, who was born in a non-consanguineous family of Portuguese origin. Importantly, early identification of the molecular defect has been instrumental to indicate HSCT in all patients, which is currently the only definitive treatment. P3 unfortunately died of severe graft-versus host disease 12 months after HSCT while P1 and P2 are free of symptoms after 4.5 years and 3 years respectively.

Main clinical features of the three patients.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Scheme depicting exon 3 deletion and breakpoints.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Comparison of haplotype inheritance between the three Portuguese families.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Sanger sequencing of cDNA showing exon 6 duplication in P3.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Scheme depicting exon 6 duplication and breakpoints.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

TNGS analysis of the IL10RB locus in P3 and her parents.

(PPTX) Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

1.  Exome sequencing identifies novel compound heterozygous mutations of IL-10 receptor 1 in neonatal-onset Crohn's disease.

Authors:  H Mao; W Yang; P P W Lee; M H-K Ho; J Yang; S Zeng; C-Y Chong; T-L Lee; W Tu; Y-L Lau
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.676

2.  A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites.

Authors:  C Dib; S Fauré; C Fizames; D Samson; N Drouot; A Vignal; P Millasseau; S Marc; J Hazan; E Seboun; M Lathrop; G Gyapay; J Morissette; J Weissenbach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Very early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in infancy is a different disease entity from adult-onset IBD; one form of interleukin-10 receptor mutations.

Authors:  Jung Ok Shim; Jeong Kee Seo
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Very early onset inflammatory bowel disease: Investigation of the IL-10 signaling pathway in Iranian children.

Authors:  Shahram Nemati; Shahram Teimourian; Mina Tabrizi; Mehri Najafi; Naghi Dara; Farid Imanzadeh; Mitra Ahmadi; Maryam Kazemi Aghdam; Mohmoud Tavassoli; Pejman Rohani; Seyyed Ramin Madani; Martin de Boer; T W Kuijpers; Dirk Roos
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Novel de novo mutations of the interleukin-10 receptor gene lead to infantile onset inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Cheng Hiang Lee; Peter Hsu; Brigitte Nanan; Ralph Nanan; Melanie Wong; Kevin J Gaskin; Rupert W Leong; Ryan Murchie; Aleixo M Muise; Michael O Stormon
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 9.071

6.  Clinical outcome in IL-10- and IL-10 receptor-deficient patients with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Karin R Engelhardt; Neil Shah; Intan Faizura-Yeop; Dilara F Kocacik Uygun; Natalie Frede; Aleixo M Muise; Eyal Shteyer; Serkan Filiz; Ronnie Chee; Mamoun Elawad; Britta Hartmann; Peter D Arkwright; Christopher Dvorak; Christoph Klein; Jennifer M Puck; Bodo Grimbacher; Erik-Oliver Glocker
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Diagnostic Yield of Next-generation Sequencing in Very Early-onset Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Multicentre Study.

Authors:  Fabienne Charbit-Henrion; Marianna Parlato; Sylvain Hanein; Rémi Duclaux-Loras; Jan Nowak; Bernadette Begue; Sabine Rakotobe; Julie Bruneau; Cécile Fourrage; Olivier Alibeu; Frédéric Rieux-Laucat; Eva Lévy; Marie-Claude Stolzenberg; Fabienne Mazerolles; Sylvain Latour; Christelle Lenoir; Alain Fischer; Capucine Picard; Marina Aloi; Jorge Amil Dias; Mongi Ben Hariz; Anne Bourrier; Christian Breuer; Anne Breton; Jiri Bronski; Stephan Buderus; Mara Cananzi; Stéphanie Coopman; Clara Crémilleux; Alain Dabadie; Clémentine Dumant-Forest; Odul Egritas Gurkan; Alexandre Fabre; Aude Fischer; Marta German Diaz; Yago Gonzalez-Lama; Olivier Goulet; Graziella Guariso; Neslihan Gurcan; Matjaz Homan; Jean-Pierre Hugot; Eric Jeziorski; Evi Karanika; Alain Lachaux; Peter Lewindon; Rosa Lima; Fernando Magro; Janos Major; Georgia Malamut; Emmanuel Mas; Istvan Mattyus; Luisa M Mearin; Jan Melek; Victor Manuel Navas-Lopez; Anders Paerregaard; Cecile Pelatan; Bénédicte Pigneur; Isabel Pinto Pais; Julie Rebeuh; Claudio Romano; Nadia Siala; Caterina Strisciuglio; Michela Tempia-Caliera; Patrick Tounian; Dan Turner; Vaidotas Urbonas; Stéphanie Willot; Frank M Ruemmele; Nadine Cerf-Bensussan
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 9.071

Review 8.  A Variety of Alu-Mediated Copy Number Variations Can Underlie IL-12Rβ1 Deficiency.

Authors:  Jérémie Rosain; Carmen Oleaga-Quintas; Caroline Deswarte; Hannah Verdin; Stéphane Marot; Garyfallia Syridou; Mahboubeh Mansouri; S Alireza Mahdaviani; Edna Venegas-Montoya; Maria Tsolia; Mehrnaz Mesdaghi; Liudmyla Chernyshova; Yuriy Stepanovskiy; Nima Parvaneh; Davood Mansouri; Sigifredo Pedraza-Sánchez; Anastasia Bondarenko; Sara E Espinosa-Padilla; Marco A Yamazaki-Nakashimada; Alejandro Nieto-Patlán; Gaspard Kerner; Nathalie Lambert; Corinne Jacques; Emilie Corvilain; Mélanie Migaud; Virginie Grandin; María T Herrera; Fabienne Jabot-Hanin; Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis; Capucine Picard; Patrick Nitschke; Anne Puel; Frederic Tores; Laurent Abel; Lizbeth Blancas-Galicia; Elfride De Baere; Christine Bole-Feysot; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Jacinta Bustamante
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 8.317

9.  Structural basis of recognition of interferon-α receptor by tyrosine kinase 2.

Authors:  Heidi J A Wallweber; Christine Tam; Yvonne Franke; Melissa A Starovasnik; Patrick J Lupardus
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2018 update.

Authors:  Jonathan Casper; Ann S Zweig; Chris Villarreal; Cath Tyner; Matthew L Speir; Kate R Rosenbloom; Brian J Raney; Christopher M Lee; Brian T Lee; Donna Karolchik; Angie S Hinrichs; Maximilian Haeussler; Luvina Guruvadoo; Jairo Navarro Gonzalez; David Gibson; Ian T Fiddes; Christopher Eisenhart; Mark Diekhans; Hiram Clawson; Galt P Barber; Joel Armstrong; David Haussler; Robert M Kuhn; W James Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

1.  The clinical, molecular, and therapeutic features of patients with IL10/IL10R deficiency: a systematic review.

Authors:  Niusha Sharifinejad; Majid Zaki-Dizaji; Roya Sepahvandi; Farimah Fayyaz; Maria Marluce Dos Santos Vilela; Gehad ElGhazali; Hassan Abolhassani; Hans D Ochs; Gholamreza Azizi
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.732

2.  Herpes simplex encephalitis in a patient with a distinctive form of inherited IFNAR1 deficiency.

Authors:  Paul Bastard; Jeremy Manry; Jie Chen; Jérémie Rosain; Yoann Seeleuthner; Omar AbuZaitun; Lazaro Lorenzo; Taushif Khan; Mary Hasek; Nicholas Hernandez; Benedetta Bigio; Peng Zhang; Romain Lévy; Shai Shrot; Eduardo J Garcia Reino; Yoon-Seung Lee; Soraya Boucherit; Mélodie Aubart; Rik Gijsbers; Vivien Béziat; Zhi Li; Sandra Pellegrini; Flore Rozenberg; Nico Marr; Isabelle Meyts; Bertrand Boisson; Aurélie Cobat; Jacinta Bustamante; Qian Zhang; Emmanuelle Jouangy; Laurent Abel; Raz Somech; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Shen-Ying Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Monogenic Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Ryusuke Nambu; Neil Warner; Daniel J Mulder; Daniel Kotlarz; Dermot P B McGovern; Judy Cho; Christoph Klein; Scott B Snapper; Anne M Griffiths; Itaru Iwama; Aleixo M Muise
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 4.  Human genetics of life-threatening influenza pneumonitis.

Authors:  Qian Zhang
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Two common disease-associated TYK2 variants impact exon splicing and TYK2 dosage.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Maxime Rotival; Etienne Patin; Frédérique Michel; Sandra Pellegrini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.