Literature DB >> 30364866

A Comparison of Narcotic Consumption Between Hospital and Ambulatory-Based Surgery Centers Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Dustin H Massel1, Ankur S Narain1, Fady Y Hijji1, Benjamin C Mayo1, Daniel D Bohl1, Gregory D Lopez1, Kern Singh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared outcomes between hospital-based (HBCs) and ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the association between narcotic consumption and pain in the early postoperative period has not been well characterized. As such, the purpose of this study is to compare pain, narcotic consumption, and length of stay (LOS) between HBC and ASC patients undergoing same-day-discharge following ACDF.
METHODS: A surgical registry of patients who underwent a primary, 1- or 2-level ACDF during 2013-2015 was reviewed. Patients were stratified by operative location. Differences in demographics were assessed using independent-sample t tests and chi-square analysis. The presence of an association between operative location and outcomes was analyzed using Poisson regression with robust error variance or linear regression adjusted for preoperative characteristics.
RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were identified, of which 42 and 34 underwent surgery at an HBC or ASC, respectively. The HBC cohort had greater total (P < .001) and hourly (P = .034) narcotic consumption and prolonged LOS (P < .001). Over 90% of ASC patients consumed less than or equal to the 30th percentile (32.0 mg) of oral morphine equivalents (OME), whereas over 57% of HBC patients consumed greater than 32.0 mg OME. The HBC cohort consumed greater average doses of fentanyl and oxycodone (P < .001 for each).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients undergoing same-day surgery for primary 1- or 2-level ACDF received more narcotics at HBCs compared to at ASCs. The increased narcotic consumption at HBCs may have resulted in longer LOS; however, this did not impact long-term pain, complications, or clinical outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients scheduled to be discharged on postoperative day 0 following ACDF at HBCs may be able to receive fewer narcotics and be discharged sooner without compromising pain control or increasing their risk for complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory surgery center; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; hospital; inpatient pain; narcotic consumption; same-day discharge

Year:  2018        PMID: 30364866      PMCID: PMC6198628          DOI: 10.14444/5075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  40 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Jørgen B Dahl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Feasibility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as an outpatient procedure.

Authors:  Jayme Trahan; Marina V Abramova; Erich O Richter; John C Steck
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Outpatient Cervical and Lumbar Spine Surgery is Feasible and Safe: A Consecutive Single Center Series of 1449 Patients.

Authors:  Øystein Helseth; Bjarne Lied; Charlotte Marie Halvorsen; Kåre Ekseth; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  National trends in anterior cervical fusion procedures.

Authors:  Satyajit Marawar; Federico P Girardi; Andrew A Sama; Yan Ma; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Melanie C Besculides; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  The epidemiology of neck pain.

Authors:  D G Hoy; M Protani; R De; R Buchbinder
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib versus hydrocodone/acetaminophen in the treatment of pain after ambulatory orthopedic surgery in adults.

Authors:  J S Gimbel; A Brugger; W Zhao; K M Verburg; G S Geis
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Evan Pushchak; Sigita Burneikiene; Jeffrey J Thramann
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery.

Authors:  Ole Mathiesen; Benny Dahl; Berit A Thomsen; Birgitte Kitter; Nan Sonne; Jørgen B Dahl; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Microlumbar discectomy. Is it safe as an outpatient procedure?

Authors:  F Zahrawi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Spine surgeon ownership of ambulatory surgery centers.

Authors:  Andre M Samuel; Mark T Langhans; Sravisht Iyer
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 2.  Current trends in ambulatory spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward M DelSole; Heeren S Makanji; Mark F Kurd
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

3.  Retrospective Data Analysis and Literature Review for a Development of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Fassil B Mesfin; Stanley Hoang; Michael Ortiz Torres; Ruben Ngnitewe Massa'a; Raul Castillo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.