Literature DB >> 11293556

Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib versus hydrocodone/acetaminophen in the treatment of pain after ambulatory orthopedic surgery in adults.

J S Gimbel1, A Brugger, W Zhao, K M Verburg, G S Geis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current outpatient management of postoperative pain includes the use of oral opioid analgesics or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; however, both types of medications are associated with side effects that can limit their usefulness in the outpatient setting.
OBJECTIVE: Two studies with identical protocols assessed the single- and multiple-dose analgesic efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in the treatment of acute pain after orthopedic surgery.
METHODS: These were multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trials conducted between January and June 1998. Both consisted of a single-dose assessment period (SDAP) and a multiple-dose assessment period (MDAP). In the SDAP, patients who had undergone orthopedic surgery received a single oral dose of celecoxib 200 mg, hydrocodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 1000 mg, or placebo within 24 hours after the end of anesthesia, with pain assessments conducted over the following 8-hour period. In the MDAP, extending from 8 hours after the first dose of study medication up to 5 days, patients who had received < or =1 dose of rescue medication during the SDAP continued on study medication (placebo recipients were rerandomized to active treatment), which could be taken up to 3 times a day as needed.
RESULTS: A total of 418 patients were enrolled in the 2 trials. During the SDAP, 141 patients received celecoxib, 136 received hydrocodone/acetaminophen, and 141 received placebo. During the MDAP, 185 patients received celecoxib and 181 received hydrocodone/acetaminophen. When the combined data were analyzed, mean pain intensity difference (PID) scores generally favored the active treatments over placebo from 1 to 6 hours (with the exception of 1.5 hours) after dosing (P < or = 0.016) and favored celecoxib over the other treatments at 7 and 8 hours after dosing (P < 0.001). The active treatments demonstrated superior summed PID scores through 8 hours (P < 0.001), significantly shorter median times to onset of analgesia (P < 0.05), and significantly longer median times to first use of rescue medication (P < 0.05). During the MDAP, more hydrocodone/acetaminophen-treated patients (20%) than celecoxib-treated patients (12%) required rescue medication (P < 0.05), and the celecoxib group had significantly lower maximum pain intensity scores (P < 0.001, days 2-5), required fewer doses of study medication (P < or = 0.01, days 3-5), and had superior scores on a modified American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (P < or = 0.013). In addition, a significantly lower proportion of celecoxib-treated patients experienced adverse events (43%) compared with hydrocodone/acetaminophen-treated patients (89%; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Over 8 hours, patients with moderate to severe pain after orthopedic surgery experienced comparable analgesia with single doses of celecoxib and hydrocodone/acetaminophen. Over a 5-day period, oral doses of celecoxib 200 mg taken 3 times a day demonstrated superior analgesia and tolerability compared with hydrocodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 1000 mg taken 3 times a day. Most patients required no more than 2 daily doses of celecoxib 200 mg for the control of their postorthopedic surgical pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11293556     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80005-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  20 in total

1.  Information for physicians and pharmacists about drugs that might cause dry mouth: a study of monographs and published literature.

Authors:  Caroline T Nguyen; Michael I MacEntee; Barbara Mintzes; Thomas L Perry
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Paracetamol for low back pain.

Authors:  Bruno T Saragiotto; Gustavo C Machado; Manuela L Ferreira; Marina B Pinheiro; Christina Abdel Shaheed; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-07

3.  Perioperative Celecoxib and Postoperative Opioid Use in Hand Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Stepan; Daniel A London; Daniel A Osei; Martin I Boyer; Agnes Z Dardas; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Preoperative use of selective COX-II inhibitors for pain management in laparoscopic nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Z Alanoglu; Y Ateş; B C Orbey; A G Türkçapar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Single dose oral celecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults.

Authors:  Sheena Derry; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-22

Review 6.  Single dose oral celecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults.

Authors:  Sheena Derry; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

Review 7.  Celecoxib: a review of its use in the management of arthritis and acute pain.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Randomised double blind trial of etoricoxib and indometacin in treatment of acute gouty arthritis.

Authors:  H Ralph Schumacher; Judith A Boice; David I Daikh; Saurabh Mukhopadhyay; Kerstin Malmstrom; Jennifer Ng; Guillermo A Tate; Javier Molina
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-22

9.  A Comparison of Narcotic Consumption Between Hospital and Ambulatory-Based Surgery Centers Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Dustin H Massel; Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Benjamin C Mayo; Daniel D Bohl; Gregory D Lopez; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-10-15

Review 10.  Analgesia in the emergency department: a GRADE-based evaluation of research evidence and recommendations for practice.

Authors:  Chris Lipp; Raj Dhaliwal; Eddy Lang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.