Literature DB >> 30363270

68Ga-DTPA Anti-HER2 positron emission tomography/CT successfully predicts the overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor in lung metastases from breast cancer.

Quetzali Gabriela Pitalúa-Cortés1, Francisco O García-Pérez1, Yolanda Villaseñor-Navarro2, Fernando Ulises Lara-Medina1, Juan Antonio Matus-Santos3, Irma Soldevilla-Gallardo1, Fany Iris Porras-Reyes4, Victor Manuel Pérez-Sánchez4, Héctor Aquiles Maldonado-Martínez4, Wendy Pérez-Báez4, Isabel Sollozo-Dupont1.   

Abstract

Molecular identification of a metastatic tumour without the inconvenience of a biopsy and the time required for pathological characterization is possible using molecular imaging. Here, we present the case of a patient with breast cancer in whom 68Ga-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positron emission tomography-CT was successfully employed to characterize the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in metastatic sites.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 30363270      PMCID: PMC6159203          DOI: 10.1259/bjrcr.20160136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJR Case Rep        ISSN: 2055-7159


Background

Breast cancer is a major public health issue in low-income and middle-income countries.[1] In these patients, it is not the primary tumour, but its metastases at distant sites, that is the main cause of death.[2] On the other hand, among the most recurrent spots for metastatic expression as a consequence of breast cancer is the lung, predicting a poor prognosis with the cancer progression to this organ.[2-3] Concerning pathogenesis, it is well known that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), when overexpressed, is associated with an aggressive form of breast cancer with a significantly shortened disease-free and overall survival.[4] In fact, the determination of HER2 status is imperative in the primary breast cancer tissue to select an appropriate pharmacological intervention.[5] Despite a biopsy being commonly required to provide the tissue diagnosis, as breast cancer progresses, collecting samples from metastases is not a routine practice.[6] Therefore, therapeutic decisions for advanced disease are often based on the features of the primary tumour, neglecting evolutionary aspects of cancer progression that increase the risk of early death, such as immunophenotypic variations between primary and metastatic disease.[7-8] For example, it is widely reported that breast cancer patients, who initially responded to endocrine therapy, are more vulnerable to develop de novo or acquired treatment resistance, notable here being the possible HER2 amplification.[8-9] The infeasibility of a biopsy of metastatic sites underscores the need to investigate further non-invasive molecular techniques to support therapy decisions; here, we report a case of HER2-negative primary breast cancer in which 68Ga-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) anti-HER2 positron emission tomography (PET)/CT detects the overexpression of HER2 in lung metastases. This case is clinically relevant as the assessment of the HER2 status lacked a precise definition of positivity. Thus, radionuclide molecular imaging was especially important to guide pathology.

Case report

In August 2008, a 43-year-old female underwent a partial mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection for right-sided breast cancer. Pathological diagnosis confirmed an infiltrating canalicular carcinoma (1.0 × 1.2 cm in diameter) as the primary tumour. Lymph node metastasis was observed in 6/34 harvested nodes. The disease was classified as stage IIIA according to the Union for International Cancer Control Tumour Node Metastasis classification for breast cancer(T1C N2 M0). A subsequent immunohistochemical examination revealed positive expression of hormone receptors in the primary tumour as well as the HER2 status as negative. After surgery, the patient received four cycles of 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide, followed by radiotherapy (60 Gy) and 12 cycles of paclitaxel. Once adjuvant chemotherapy was completed, the patient received goserelin and tamoxifen during 2 and 5 years, respectively. Six years after surgery, in response to a complaint of respiratory symptoms, the patient underwent a CT. The CT revealed a mediastinal nodal conglomerate, multiple lung nodules and right pleural effusion. Then, the patient was subjected to a PET/CT with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT to evaluate the extent of the metastatic lesions. The PET/CT revealed increased 18F-FDG uptake in the lungs, bones and axillary lymph nodes (Figure 1a). The largest pulmonary nodule (17 mm), localized at the posterior basal segment of the left lower lobe, showed an SUVmax value of 10.7, whereas a mediastinal lymph node had an SUVmax of 3.9.
Figure 1.

A 43-year-old woman with metastatic breast disease.18F-Fludeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT maximum intensity projection shows 18F-FDG-avid uptake in the lung, mediastinum and bone (a). Coronal PET/CT slice shows a 17 mm-pulmonary nodule localized at the posterior basal segment of the lower side of the left lobe with SUVmax of 10.7 (b). The patient was subject to another PET/CT study using 18F-fluoroestradiol (c). The maximum intensity projection shows focal uptake sites in the lung (d). Consistent with the metabolic response seen in panel (b), the same focus had an increased response by using 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 (SUVmax = 3.3) (e, f).

A 43-year-old woman with metastatic breast disease.18F-Fludeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT maximum intensity projection shows 18F-FDG-avid uptake in the lung, mediastinum and bone (a). Coronal PET/CT slice shows a 17 mm-pulmonary nodule localized at the posterior basal segment of the lower side of the left lobe with SUVmax of 10.7 (b). The patient was subject to another PET/CT study using 18F-fluoroestradiol (c). The maximum intensity projection shows focal uptake sites in the lung (d). Consistent with the metabolic response seen in panel (b), the same focus had an increased response by using 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 (SUVmax = 3.3) (e, f). Owing to the aggressiveness of the disease, a phenotypic conversion at metastatic sites was suspected, including modification of the hormone receptor status (ER, PR). Thus, a parallel study using 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 and 18F-16α-17β-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) was subsequently conducted (Figure 1b,c). Metastatic tumours of the lungs and lymph nodes were visualized with both radiotracers, and the SUVmax values from the largest lesions were presented as follows: 3.3 for the lung lesion and 3.4 for lymph node using 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2, and 3.2 and 3.3 for the lung and lymph node with 18F-FES. Thus, the resulting biopsy specimens were obtained from both metastatic lesions exhibiting the highest uptake to confirm the HER2 overexpression. Lastly, immunohistochemical examination revealed positive staining for hormone receptors in the breast (Figure 2a,d), lymph node (Figure 2b,e) and lung (Figure 2c,f), whereas HER2 was negative in the breast (Figure 2g) and indeterminate (2+) in both metastatic sites (Figure 2h,i). However, using fluorescence microscopy and in situ hybridization (FISH), HER2 overexpression was confirmed in the lymph node (4.18) as well as in the lung (3.19) (Figure 2k,l), whereas the primary tumour remained negative (Figure 2j).
Figure 2.

Images of the patient showing an infiltrating canalicular carcinoma with strong positive staining for oestrogen receptors in the breast (a), lymph node (b) and lung (c), with histological scores of 140, 120 and 130, respectively. Progesterone receptor expression with histological scores of 70, 40 and 5 in the breast, lymph node and lung (d–f) respectively. An indeterminate staining for HER2 analysis was visualized at the primary tumour (g) and both metastatic sites (h: lymph node; i: lung) by using immunohistochemistry (IHC; 2+ for all tissues). The expression of HER2 was corroborated by using fluorescence microscopy and in situ hybridization. The results were found as follows: Breast (j) not amplified (ERBB2:Cen17 ratio = 1.00) Nuclear in situ Hybridization (D17Z 1 × 2, ERBB2 × 2~17)[35]. Lymph node (k) amplified (ERBB2:Cen17 ratio = 4.08) Nuclear in situ Hybridization (D17Z 1 × 2, ERBB2 × 2~17)[60]. Lung (l) amplified (ERBB2:Cen17 ratio = 3.19) Nuclear in situ Hybridization (D17Z 1 × 2, ERBB2 × 2~17)[60].

Images of the patient showing an infiltrating canalicular carcinoma with strong positive staining for oestrogen receptors in the breast (a), lymph node (b) and lung (c), with histological scores of 140, 120 and 130, respectively. Progesterone receptor expression with histological scores of 70, 40 and 5 in the breast, lymph node and lung (d–f) respectively. An indeterminate staining for HER2 analysis was visualized at the primary tumour (g) and both metastatic sites (h: lymph node; i: lung) by using immunohistochemistry (IHC; 2+ for all tissues). The expression of HER2 was corroborated by using fluorescence microscopy and in situ hybridization. The results were found as follows: Breast (j) not amplified (ERBB2:Cen17 ratio = 1.00) Nuclear in situ Hybridization (D17Z 1 × 2, ERBB2 × 2~17)[35]. Lymph node (k) amplified (ERBB2:Cen17 ratio = 4.08) Nuclear in situ Hybridization (D17Z 1 × 2, ERBB2 × 2~17)[60]. Lung (l) amplified (ERBB2:Cen17 ratio = 3.19) Nuclear in situ Hybridization (D17Z 1 × 2, ERBB2 × 2~17)[60].

Materials and methods

Preparation of 68Ga-DTPA Anti-HER2

Anti-HER2 (trastuzumab) was modified with cyclic diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA). The initial DTPA conjugation was performed at a 1:10 molar ratio with 100 mg of trastuzumab in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate (pH 8). Ultrafiltration removed unbound DTPA. For radiolabelling of trastuzumab-DTPA, 50 mg of the conjugated monoclonal antibody and 2 ml of 0.1 sodium acetate (pH 5.5) were mixed with 185 MBq of 68Ga (2 ml, 0.1 M HCl) and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The final product was sterilized by passing through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Millex-GP syringe filter unit, Millipore).

Administration of 68Ga-DTPA Anti HER2, 18F-FES and 18F-FDG

The patient underwent 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2, 18F-fluoroestradiol (FES) and 18F-FDG PET/CT. The studies were performed on three separate days. The interval between these three scans was less than 7 days. 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 (185 MBq) was infused intravenously in 100 ml of saline for 10 min. 18F-FDG (237 MBq) was intravenously infused with Medrad® Intego PET Infusion System. Meanwhile, 18F-FES (222 MBq) was dissolved in 2 ml of saline solution and administrated in an intravenous bolus. Only before the 18F-FDG PET/CT, the patient was requested to fast for at least 4 h. At the time of the tracer injection, a blood glucose level of 10 mmol l–1 was registered. The administration of 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 was closely monitored because of the risk of fever, chills and vomit. The woman was kept lying comfortably in a quiet, dimly lit room during the time required for all procedures.

PET-CT imaging

Images were obtained on a Biograph mCT 20 Excel PET/CT scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Whole-body PET was performed 50–70 min after the injection of all tracers. Low-dose CT was acquired using 120 kV, which was automated from 100–130 kV, a 512 × 512 matrix, a 50 cm field of view, 3.75 mm slice thickness and a rotation time of 0.8 s, extending from the vertex to the proximal thighs. Immediately after the CT acquisition, a whole-body PET was acquired. For each bed position (length 16.2 cm, overlapping scale 4.2 cm), we used 2 min acquisition time with a 50 cm field of view (matrix size 168 × 168). The emission data were corrected for randoms, scatter and decay. Reconstruction was conducted with an ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm with three iterations/12 subsets and Gauss-filtered to a transaxial resolution of 6 mm at full-width at half-maximum. Attenuation correction was performed using the low-dose non-enhanced CT.

Image and pathological analysis

A workstation Multimodality Workplace (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) providing multiplanar reformatted images was used for image display and analysis. The SUVmax of whole-body tumours were measured with the isocontour tool of the TrueD Syngo software (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with manual threshold adjustment. SUVmax was calculated with the radioactivity measured from an image acquired at the time, decay corrected to t = 0 and converted from a volume to a mass-based unit via the factor 1/(1 g ml–1), the injected dose at t = 0 and the body weight on the day of imaging. Also, the correlation of 18F-FES uptake (SUVmax) with ER expression was measured by H-score. The H-score or histo-score is a method of assessing the extent of nuclear immunoreactivity, applicable to steroid receptors.[10] The score was obtained by the formula: 3 × percentage of strongly staining nuclei + 2 × percentage of moderately staining nuclei + percentage of weakly staining nuclei, given a range of 0 to 300. When the H-score was ≥1%, positive cells to steroid receptors was confirmed. 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 uptake was compared with HER2 expression measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (positive or negative), ordering FISH only when the IHC results did not clearly show whether the cells were HER2-positive or negative. FISH results were presented as a quantitative score of the level of gene amplification, and the results were expressed as a ratio of the number of HER2 gene copies per number of chromosome 17 copies.[11] The ratio was considered abnormal when it was greater than 1.8 (FISH+). Tissue samples were collected 3 days after all imaging studies.

Discussion

The data obtained from this clinical case show that 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 has the capability to identify HER2-expressing metastatic lesions from breast cancer. Importantly, HER2 overexpression was foreseen in lymph nodes and lung metastases by molecular imaging when the IHC analysis was indeterminate for both metastatic sites. In spite of 18F-FDG showing the highest uptake, 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 provided unique information of metastasis-specific biomarker status. The origin of the moderate uptake of 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 remains to be determined, but may be related to low levels of HER2 expression.[12] In any case, we assume that the volume of air contained in lungs enhanced the intrinsic tissue contrast, favouring the rapid visualization of metastatic lesions (40 min after 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 injection). However, it is important to note that the liver and heart had an intense radiotracer background activity (68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 SUVmax = 9.45 and 8.7, respectively) that might obscure metastases, increasing the chance of getting false-negative in these organs. Given the absence of liver and heart metastases, background activity was not a problem in the present case. Nevertheless, the possibility of missed lesions in a tissue that normally clears background activity over time (60–90 min post injection, such as the liver) has favoured the use of radioisotopes with a half-life longer than the half-life of 68Ga (t1/2 = 68 min). For instance, other research groups have developed PET/CT imaging strategies using the full therapeutic antibody trastuzumab labelled with 89Zr or 64Cu to identify HER2 overexpression.[13-16] This approach, however, has an important disadvantage related to slow blood clearance, resulting in a late imaging time point of 1–2 d (64Cu) or 4–5 d (89Zr) after tracer injection, a long scanning time of up to 1 h and a high radiation burden of 12 mSv (64Cu) or 18 mSv (89Zr) for the patient.[12] Additionally, 89Zr and 64Cu are produced by expensive accelerators or reactors, contrary to the possible greater production and availability of 68Ga.[17] On the other hand, the slow blood clearance has been solved using fully functional segments of trastuzumab, dubbed “Nanobodies or Affibodies,”[18] coupled with different radiotracers including 68Ga. Several studies demonstrated that those trastuzumab fragments found and bound HER2 receptors within the first hours after administration[12,19-21] and this, together with rapid blood clearance, allowed imaging of tumours as early as 30–60 min after injection.[22] For example, by comparing the high-contrasted images of HER2-binding Affibodies –025 and -002 with images obtained using the full antibody trastuzumab, the former are obtained in a shorter time with a significant reduction of the background activity within the liver.[12,19–24 ] Furthermore, the present case indicates the possibility that an initially HER2-negative breast cancer can become HER2 positive following treatment. Multiple mechanisms are proposed to explain the HER2 conversion, including de novo heterogeneity and the formation of different subclones that can metastasize.[25-26] Importantly, several authors reported that if during disease progression, a patient acquires HER2 positivity, the survival rate may decrease because of the possibility of resistance to treatment.[26-28] Therefore, the reassessment of HER2 status using non-invasive PET/CT instead of performing a biopsy is now a key component of diagnosis, with the hope, when possible, of optimizing treatment in patients who could profit from trastuzumab or other therapeutic approaches targeted against HER2.[29-31] Finally, according to pathologist guidelines for HER2 testing, IHC and FISH are equally reliable, having the same precision if properly carried out.[32] Nevertheless, we consider that the difficulty in interpreting the 2+ IHC not only supports the utility of FISH but also reinforces clinical imaging using 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 PET/CT to guide pathology. In summary, this report corroborates that 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 PET/CT is useful in characterizing changes in tumour expression of HER2 across breast cancer progression. However, more research is needed to expand the clinical utility of this radiotracer.

Conclusions

This research supports the feasibility of using 68Ga-DTPA anti-HER2 for evaluating HER2 overexpression in metastatic breast cancer, demonstrating that the development of a pathology using in vivo molecular imaging may overcome limitations linked to conventional diagnostic studies of primary tumours. The acquisition of tissue from metastatic deposits is not routine practice. Thus, following the development of distant metastases in breast cancer patients, systemic treatment selection depends on the tissue characteristics of the primary tumour. Given that the expression of hormone receptors and HER2 of the primary breast cancer and its corresponding distant metastatic sites are often dissimilar, this can lead to an inappropriate choice of systemic treatment. A potential mapping of hormone receptors and HER2 expression using non-invasive PET imaging analysis is presented here, demonstrating that radiotracers labelling specific receptors are important for exploring immunophenotypic variations in breast cancer metastatic disease. In our opinion, in the future, advances in systemic therapy for breast cancer patients might depend, at least in part, on using specific PET-radioligands.

Consent

Written informed consent for the case to be published (including images, case history and data) was obtained for publication of this case report.
  31 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Engineered protein scaffolds as next-generation antibody therapeutics.

Authors:  Michaela Gebauer; Arne Skerra
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 3.  Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Daniela F Quail; Johanna A Joyce
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Past, present and future of 68Ge/68Ga generators.

Authors:  F Rösch
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Molecular imaging of HER2-expressing malignant tumors in breast cancer patients using synthetic 111In- or 68Ga-labeled affibody molecules.

Authors:  Richard P Baum; Vikas Prasad; Dirk Müller; Christiane Schuchardt; Anna Orlova; Anders Wennborg; Vladimir Tolmachev; Joachim Feldwisch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  HER2 as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Ménard; S Fortis; F Castiglioni; R Agresti; A Balsari
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Structural basis for high-affinity HER2 receptor binding by an engineered protein.

Authors:  Charles Eigenbrot; Mark Ultsch; Anatoly Dubnovitsky; Lars Abrahmsén; Torleif Härd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Management of breast cancer with targeted agents: importance of heterogeneity. [corrected].

Authors:  Serena Di Cosimo; José Baselga
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Breast cancer in Mexico: a growing challenge to health and the health system.

Authors:  Yanin Chávarri-Guerra; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Pedro E R Liedke; Felicia Knaul; Alejandro Mohar; Dianne M Finkelstein; Paul E Goss
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 10.  Cancer stratification by molecular imaging.

Authors:  Justus Weber; Uwe Haberkorn; Walter Mier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiolabeled Peptides and Antibodies in Medicine.

Authors:  Paweł Kręcisz; Kamila Czarnecka; Leszek Królicki; Elżbieta Mikiciuk-Olasik; Paweł Szymański
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.774

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.