Jacek Capala1, Kirsten Bouchelouche. 1. Molecular Targeting Section, Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. CapalaJ@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HER2 overexpression is correlated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor clinical outcome. Therefore, HER2 has become an important prognostic and predictive factor, as well as a target for molecular therapies. The article reviews recent advances in molecular imaging of HER2 that could facilitate individual approaches to targeted therapy of HER2-positive breast cancers. RECENT FINDINGS: Because of the heterogeneity of breast cancer and possible discordance in HER2 status between primary tumors and distant metastases, assessment of HER2 expression by noninvasive imaging may become an important complement to immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in-situ hybridization analyses of biopsied tissue. Monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, or small scaffold proteins such as affibody molecules are used as HER2-targeting agents. For imaging purposes, these agents are labeled with positron or gamma-emitting radionuclides, optical dyes, or paramagnetic contrast molecules for positron emission tomography single photon emission tomography optical, and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. HER2-specific molecular probes, combined with modern imaging techniques to provide information on HER2 expression not only in primary tumors but also in distant metastases not amenable to biopsy, may reduce problems with false negative results and, thereby, influence patient management by selecting patients that would benefit from HER2-targeted therapies. SUMMARY: The new 'image and treat' strategy, involving assessment of target presence and distribution in an individual patient followed by optimized, target-specific drug delivery, may potentially improve efficacy of cancer treatment while reducing side effects.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HER2 overexpression is correlated with aggressive tumor behavior and poor clinical outcome. Therefore, HER2 has become an important prognostic and predictive factor, as well as a target for molecular therapies. The article reviews recent advances in molecular imaging of HER2 that could facilitate individual approaches to targeted therapy of HER2-positive breast cancers. RECENT FINDINGS: Because of the heterogeneity of breast cancer and possible discordance in HER2 status between primary tumors and distant metastases, assessment of HER2 expression by noninvasive imaging may become an important complement to immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in-situ hybridization analyses of biopsied tissue. Monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab, or small scaffold proteins such as affibody molecules are used as HER2-targeting agents. For imaging purposes, these agents are labeled with positron or gamma-emitting radionuclides, optical dyes, or paramagnetic contrast molecules for positron emission tomography single photon emission tomography optical, and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. HER2-specific molecular probes, combined with modern imaging techniques to provide information on HER2 expression not only in primary tumors but also in distant metastases not amenable to biopsy, may reduce problems with false negative results and, thereby, influence patient management by selecting patients that would benefit from HER2-targeted therapies. SUMMARY: The new 'image and treat' strategy, involving assessment of target presence and distribution in an individual patient followed by optimized, target-specific drug delivery, may potentially improve efficacy of cancer treatment while reducing side effects.
Authors: John R Benson; Ismail Jatoi; Martin Keisch; Francisco J Esteva; Andreas Makris; V Craig Jordan Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-04-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kristin McLarty; Bart Cornelissen; Zhongli Cai; Deborah A Scollard; Danny L Costantini; Susan J Done; Raymond M Reilly Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sara Ahlgren; Helena Wållberg; Thuy A Tran; Charles Widström; Magnus Hjertman; Lars Abrahmsén; Dietmar Berndorff; Ludger M Dinkelborg; John E Cyr; Joachim Feldwisch; Anna Orlova; Vladimir Tolmachev Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sang Bong Lee; Moinuddin Hassan; Robert Fisher; Oleg Chertov; Victor Chernomordik; Gabriela Kramer-Marek; Amir Gandjbakhche; Jacek Capala Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Y Ardeshirpour; V Chernomordik; J Capala; M Hassan; R Zielinsky; G Griffiths; S Achilefu; P Smith; A Gandjbakhche Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-12
Authors: Eunsoo Yoo; Huaitzung A Cheng; Lauren E Nardacci; David J Beaman; Charles T Drinnan; Carmen Lee; Kenneth W Fishbein; Richard G Spencer; Omar Z Fisher; Amber L Doiron Journal: Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 5.268
Authors: Ingrid J G Burvenich; Sagun Parakh; Adam C Parslow; Sze Ting Lee; Hui K Gan; Andrew M Scott Journal: AAPS J Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Marta Kijanka; Frank-Jan Warnders; Mohamed El Khattabi; Marjolijn Lub-de Hooge; Gooitzen M van Dam; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Liesbeth de Vries; Sabrina Oliveira; Paul M P van Bergen En Henegouwen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 9.236