Douglas M Sloane1, Herbert L Smith2,3, Matthew D McHugh3, Linda H Aiken3. 1. Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing. 2. Department of Sociology, Population Studies Center. 3. Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence shows hospitals with better nursing resources have better outcomes but few studies have shown that outcomes change over time within hospitals as nursing resources change. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether changes in nursing resources over time within hospitals are related to changes in quality of care and patient safety. RESEARCH DESIGN: Multilevel logistic response models, using data from a panel of 737 hospitals in which cross-sections of nurse informants surveyed in 2006 and 2016, were used to simultaneously estimate longitudinal and cross-sectional associations between nursing resources, quality of care, and patient safety. MEASURES: Nursing resources included hospital-level measures of work environments, nurse staffing, and nurse education. Care quality was measured by overall rating of care quality, confidence in patients managing care after discharge, confidence in management resolving patient care problems; patient safety was measured by patient safety grade, concern with mistakes, and freedom to question authority. RESULTS: After taking into account cross-sectional differences between hospitals, differences among nurses within hospitals, and potential confounding variables, changes within hospitals in nursing resources were associated with significant changes in quality of care and patient safety. Improvements in work environment of 1 SD decrease odds of unfavorable quality care and patient safety by factors ranging from 0.82 to 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements within hospitals in work environments, nurse staffing, and educational composition of nurses coincide with improvements in quality of care and patient safety. Cross-sectional results closely approximate longitudinal panel results.
BACKGROUND: Evidence shows hospitals with better nursing resources have better outcomes but few studies have shown that outcomes change over time within hospitals as nursing resources change. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether changes in nursing resources over time within hospitals are related to changes in quality of care and patient safety. RESEARCH DESIGN: Multilevel logistic response models, using data from a panel of 737 hospitals in which cross-sections of nurse informants surveyed in 2006 and 2016, were used to simultaneously estimate longitudinal and cross-sectional associations between nursing resources, quality of care, and patient safety. MEASURES: Nursing resources included hospital-level measures of work environments, nurse staffing, and nurse education. Care quality was measured by overall rating of care quality, confidence in patients managing care after discharge, confidence in management resolving patient care problems; patient safety was measured by patient safety grade, concern with mistakes, and freedom to question authority. RESULTS: After taking into account cross-sectional differences between hospitals, differences among nurses within hospitals, and potential confounding variables, changes within hospitals in nursing resources were associated with significant changes in quality of care and patient safety. Improvements in work environment of 1 SD decrease odds of unfavorable quality care and patient safety by factors ranging from 0.82 to 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements within hospitals in work environments, nurse staffing, and educational composition of nurses coincide with improvements in quality of care and patient safety. Cross-sectional results closely approximate longitudinal panel results.
Authors: Matthew D McHugh; Margo Brooks Carthon; Douglas M Sloane; Evan Wu; Lesly Kelly; Linda H Aiken Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Sean P Clarke; Linda Flynn; Jean Ann Seago; Joanne Spetz; Herbert L Smith Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Luk Bruyneel; Koen Van den Heede; Peter Griffiths; Reinhard Busse; Marianna Diomidous; Juha Kinnunen; Maria Kózka; Emmanuel Lesaffre; Matthew D McHugh; M T Moreno-Casbas; Anne Marie Rafferty; Rene Schwendimann; P Anne Scott; Carol Tishelman; Theo van Achterberg; Walter Sermeus Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Walter Sermeus; Koen Van den Heede; Douglas M Sloane; Reinhard Busse; Martin McKee; Luk Bruyneel; Anne Marie Rafferty; Peter Griffiths; Maria Teresa Moreno-Casbas; Carol Tishelman; Anne Scott; Tomasz Brzostek; Juha Kinnunen; Rene Schwendimann; Maud Heinen; Dimitris Zikos; Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne; Herbert L Smith; Ann Kutney-Lee Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-03-20
Authors: Lisa Smeds-Alenius; Carol Tishelman; Rikard Lindqvist; Sara Runesdotter; Matthew D McHugh Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Ann Kutney-Lee; Douglas M Sloane; Kathryn H Bowles; Lawton R Burns; Linda H Aiken Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Karen B Lasater; Olga F Jarrín; Linda H Aiken; Matthew D McHugh; Douglas M Sloane; Herbert L Smith Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jordan M Harrison; Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; J Margo Brooks Carthon; Raina M Merchant; Robert A Berg; Matthew D McHugh Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Karen B Lasater; Matthew McHugh; Paul R Rosenbaum; Linda H Aiken; Herbert Smith; Joseph G Reiter; Bijan A Niknam; Alexander S Hill; Lauren L Hochman; Siddharth Jain; Jeffrey H Silber Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 7.035