Literature DB >> 16106379

General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.

Wijnand T M Mooij1, Marcel L Verdonk.   

Abstract

We present a novel atom-atom potential derived from a database of protein-ligand complexes. First, we clarify the similarities and differences between two statistical potentials described in the literature, PMF and Drugscore. We highlight shortcomings caused by an important factor unaccounted for in their reference states, and describe a new potential, which we name the Astex Statistical Potential (ASP). ASP's reference state considers the difference in exposure of protein atom types towards ligand binding sites. We show that this new potential predicts binding affinities with an accuracy similar to that of Goldscore and Chemscore. We investigate the influence of the choice of reference state by constructing two additional statistical potentials that differ from ASP only in this respect. The reference states in these two potentials are defined along the lines of Drugscore and PMF. In docking experiments, the potential using the new reference state proposed for ASP gives better success rates than when these literature reference states were used; a success rate similar to the established scoring functions Goldscore and Chemscore is achieved with ASP. This is the case both for a large, general validation set of protein-ligand structures and for small test sets of actives against four pharmaceutically relevant targets. Virtual screening experiments for these targets show less discrimination between the different reference states in terms of enrichment. In addition, we describe how statistical potentials can be used in the construction of targeted scoring functions. Examples are given for cdk2, using four different targeted scoring functions, biased towards increasingly large target-specific databases. Using these targeted scoring functions, docking success rates as well as enrichments are significantly better than for the general ASP scoring function. Results improve with the number of structures used in the construction of the target scoring functions, thus illustrating that these targeted ASP potentials can be continuously improved as new structural data become available. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16106379     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  82 in total

1.  Improving molecular docking through eHiTS' tunable scoring function.

Authors:  Orr Ravitz; Zsolt Zsoldos; Aniko Simon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of GOLD scoring functions in a standardized test.

Authors:  John W Liebeschuetz; Jason C Cole; Oliver Korb
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Comparative evaluation of several docking tools for docking small molecule ligands to DC-SIGN.

Authors:  Gregor Jug; Marko Anderluh; Tihomir Tomašič
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Molecular docking and receptor-specific 3D-QSAR studies of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  Pran Kishore Deb; Anuradha Sharma; Poonam Piplani; Raghuram Rao Akkinepally
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.943

7.  Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  The cytotoxic potential of cationic triangulenes against tumour cells.

Authors:  Euphemia Leung; Lisa I Pilkington; Mohinder M Naiya; David Barker; Ayesha Zafar; Chatchakorn Eurtivong; Jóhannes Reynisson
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.597

9.  A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A benzoxazole derivative as an inhibitor of anaerobic choline metabolism by human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Moustafa T Gabr; David Machalz; Szymon Pach; Gerhard Wolber
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2020-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.