Literature DB >> 30361936

Prior to Initiation of Chemotherapy, Can We Predict Breast Tumor Response? Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Approach Using a Breast MRI Tumor Dataset.

Richard Ha1, Christine Chin2, Jenika Karcich3, Michael Z Liu4, Peter Chang5, Simukayi Mutasa3, Eduardo Pascual Van Sant3, Ralph T Wynn3, Eileen Connolly2, Sachin Jambawalikar4.   

Abstract

We hypothesize that convolutional neural networks (CNN) can be used to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response using a breast MRI tumor dataset prior to initiation of chemotherapy. An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of our database from January 2009 to June 2016 identified 141 locally advanced breast cancer patients who (1) underwent breast MRI prior to the initiation of NAC, (2) successfully completed adriamycin/taxane-based NAC, and (3) underwent surgical resection with available final surgical pathology data. Patients were classified into three groups based on their NAC response confirmed on final surgical pathology: complete (group 1), partial (group 2), and no response/progression (group 3). A total of 3107 volumetric slices of 141 tumors were evaluated. Breast tumor was identified on first T1 postcontrast dynamic images and underwent 3D segmentation. CNN consisted of ten convolutional layers, four max-pooling layers, and dropout of 50% after a fully connected layer. Dropout, augmentation, and L2 regularization were implemented to prevent overfitting of data. Non-linear functions were modeled by a rectified linear unit (ReLU). Batch normalization was used between the convolutional and ReLU layers to limit drift of layer activations during training. A three-class neoadjuvant prediction model was evaluated (group 1, group 2, or group 3). The CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 88% in three-class prediction of neoadjuvant treatment response. Three-class prediction discriminating one group from the other two was analyzed. Group 1 had a specificity of 95.1% ± 3.1%, sensitivity of 73.9% ± 4.5%, and accuracy of 87.7% ± 0.6%. Group 2 (partial response) had a specificity of 91.6% ± 1.3%, sensitivity of 82.4% ± 2.7%, and accuracy of 87.7% ± 0.6%. Group 3 (no response/progression) had a specificity of 93.4% ± 2.9%, sensitivity of 76.8% ± 5.7%, and accuracy of 87.8% ± 0.6%. It is feasible for current deep CNN architectures to be trained to predict NAC treatment response using a breast MRI dataset obtained prior to initiation of chemotherapy. Larger dataset will likely improve our prediction model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast MRI; Chemotherapy treatment response; Convolutional neural network

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30361936      PMCID: PMC6737125          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-018-0144-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  31 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Donald A Berry; Angela DeMichele; Lisa Carey; Sarah E Davis; Meredith Buxton; Cliff Hudis; Joe W Gray; Charles Perou; Christina Yau; Chad Livasy; Helen Krontiras; Leslie Montgomery; Debasish Tripathy; Constance Lehman; Minetta C Liu; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Hope S Rugo; John T Carpenter; Lynn Dressler; David Chhieng; Baljit Singh; Carolyn Mies; Joseph Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Dilip Giri; Laura van 't Veer; Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL.

Authors:  Nola M Hylton; Jeffrey D Blume; Wanda K Bernreuter; Etta D Pisano; Mark A Rosen; Elizabeth A Morris; Paul T Weatherall; Constance D Lehman; Gillian M Newstead; Sandra Polin; Helga S Marques; Laura J Esserman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Michael Untch; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Serban D Costa; Holger Eidtmann; Peter A Fasching; Bernd Gerber; Wolfgang Eiermann; Jörn Hilfrich; Jens Huober; Christian Jackisch; Manfred Kaufmann; Gottfried E Konecny; Carsten Denkert; Valentina Nekljudova; Keyur Mehta; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Early changes in functional dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predict for pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Mei-Lin W Ah-See; Andreas Makris; N Jane Taylor; Mark Harrison; Paul I Richman; Russell J Burcombe; J James Stirling; James A d'Arcy; David J Collins; Michael R Pittam; Duraisamy Ravichandran; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Paul L Nguyen; Alphonse G Taghian; Matthew S Katz; Andrzej Niemierko; Rita F Abi Raad; Whitney L Boon; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27.

Authors:  Priya Rastogi; Stewart J Anderson; Harry D Bear; Charles E Geyer; Morton S Kahlenberg; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; James L Hoehn; Victor G Vogel; Shaker R Dakhil; Deimante Tamkus; Karen M King; Eduardo R Pajon; Mary Johanna Wright; Jean Robert; Soonmyung Paik; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; D Craig Allred; Karen L Hagerty; Sunil Badve; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Glenn Francis; Neil S Goldstein; Malcolm Hayes; David G Hicks; Susan Lester; Richard Love; Pamela B Mangu; Lisa McShane; Keith Miller; C Kent Osborne; Soonmyung Paik; Jane Perlmutter; Anthony Rhodes; Hironobu Sasano; Jared N Schwartz; Fred C G Sweep; Sheila Taube; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul Valenstein; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel Visscher; Thomas Wheeler; R Bruce Williams; James L Wittliff; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning in breast radiology: current progress and future directions.

Authors:  William C Ou; Dogan Polat; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal oncological radiology.

Authors:  Matjaz Vogrin; Teodor Trojner; Robi Kelc
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 3.  Machine learning in breast MRI.

Authors:  Beatriu Reig; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Radiomics in breast MRI: current progress toward clinical application in the era of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Hiroko Satake; Satoko Ishigaki; Rintaro Ito; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  A narrative review on current imaging applications of artificial intelligence and radiomics in oncology: focus on the three most common cancers.

Authors:  Simone Vicini; Chandra Bortolotto; Marco Rengo; Daniela Ballerini; Davide Bellini; Iacopo Carbone; Lorenzo Preda; Andrea Laghi; Francesca Coppola; Lorenzo Faggioni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 6.  AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?

Authors:  Almir Bitencourt; Isaac Daimiel Naranjo; Roberto Lo Gullo; Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.531

7.  Robustness Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model on Sagittal and Axial Breast DCE-MRIs to Predict Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Raffaella Massafra; Maria Colomba Comes; Samantha Bove; Vittorio Didonna; Gianluca Gatta; Francesco Giotta; Annarita Fanizzi; Daniele La Forgia; Agnese Latorre; Maria Irene Pastena; Domenico Pomarico; Lucia Rinaldi; Pasquale Tamborra; Alfredo Zito; Vito Lorusso; Angelo Virgilio Paradiso
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 8.  A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Wang; Muhammad-Adil Khalil; Nabila Puspita Firdi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 9.  Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Nathaniel Braman; Amit Gupta; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 65.011

10.  Early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response by exploiting a transfer learning approach on breast DCE-MRIs.

Authors:  Maria Colomba Comes; Annarita Fanizzi; Samantha Bove; Vittorio Didonna; Sergio Diotaiuti; Daniele La Forgia; Agnese Latorre; Eugenio Martinelli; Arianna Mencattini; Annalisa Nardone; Angelo Virgilio Paradiso; Cosmo Maurizio Ressa; Pasquale Tamborra; Vito Lorusso; Raffaella Massafra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.