Literature DB >> 18413639

Breast cancer subtype approximated by estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 is associated with local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.

Paul L Nguyen1, Alphonse G Taghian, Matthew S Katz, Andrzej Niemierko, Rita F Abi Raad, Whitney L Boon, Jennifer R Bellon, Julia S Wong, Barbara L Smith, Jay R Harris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether breast cancer subtype is associated with outcome after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) consisting of lumpectomy and radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 793 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who received BCT from July 1998 to December 2001. Among them, 97% had pathologically negative margins of resection, and 90% received adjuvant systemic therapy. No patient received adjuvant trastuzumab. Receptor status was used to approximate subtype: estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative = luminal A; ER+ or PR+ and HER-2+ = luminal B; ER-and PR -and HER-2+ = HER-2; and ER-and PR -and HER-2-= basal. Competing risks methodology was used to analyze time to local recurrence and distant metastases.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 70 months. The overall 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.1); 0.8% (0.3, 2.2) for luminal A, 1.5% (0.2, 10) for luminal B, 8.4% (2.2, 30) for HER-2, and 7.1% (3.0, 16) for basal. On multivariable analysis (MVA) with luminal A as baseline, HER-2 (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 9.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 51; P = .012) and basal (AHR = 7.1; 95% CI, 1.6 to 31; P = .009) subtypes were associated with increased local recurrence. On MVA, luminal B (AHR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.5; P = .007) and basal (AHR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.2; P = .035) were associated with increased distant metastases.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the 5-year local recurrence rate after BCT was low, but varied by subtype as approximated using ER, PR, and HER-2 status. Local recurrence was particularly low for the luminal A subtype, but was less than 10% at 5 years for all subtypes. Although further follow-up is needed, these results may be useful in counseling patients about their anticipated outcome after BCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18413639     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  246 in total

1.  Triple-negative subtype predicts poor overall survival and high locoregional relapse in inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Jing Li; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Pamela K Allen; Tse K Yu; Wendy A Woodward; Naoto T Ueno; Anthony Lucci; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Yun Gong; Melissa L Bondy; Wei Yang; Jie S Willey; Massimo Cristofanilli; Vicente Valero; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Triple-negative breast cancer is not a contraindication for breast conservation.

Authors:  Farrell C Adkins; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Xiudong Lei; Leonel F Hernandez-Aya; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Jennifer K Litton; Jamie Wagner; Kelly K Hunt; Wendy A Woodward; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Identifying and targeting tumor-initiating cells in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Michael T Lewis
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.678

4.  Utilization and Outcomes of Breast Brachytherapy in Younger Women.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Jinhai Huo; Sharon H Giordano; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Patterns and risk factors of locoregional recurrence in T1-T2 node negative breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy: implications for postmastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rita Abi-Raad; Rimoun Boutrus; Rui Wang; Andrzej Niemierko; Shannon Macdonald; Barbara Smith; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Tracking and evaluating molecular tumor markers with cancer registry data: HER2 and breast cancer.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Catch and Release Photosensitizers: Combining Dual-Action Ruthenium Complexes with Protease Inactivation for Targeting Invasive Cancers.

Authors:  Karan Arora; Mackenzie Herroon; Malik H Al-Afyouni; Nicholas P Toupin; Thomas N Rohrabaugh; Lauren M Loftus; Izabela Podgorski; Claudia Turro; Jeremy J Kodanko
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Lymph node involvement in immunohistochemistry-based molecular classifications of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas K Howland; Teryn D Driver; Michael P Sedrak; Xianfeng Wen; Wenli Dong; Sandra Hatch; Mahmoud A Eltorky; Celia Chao
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Evaluation of the stage IB designation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Karla V Ballman; Linda M McCall; Min Yi; Aysegul A Sahin; Isabelle Bedrosian; Nora Hansen; Sheryl Gabram; Thelma Hurd; Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A phase I study of intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Masataka Sawaki; Shigenori Sato; Toyone Kikumori; Shunichi Ishihara; Yuichi Aoyama; Yoshiyuki Itoh; Akimasa Nakao; Tsuneo Imai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.