Literature DB >> 23103696

Left ventricular reverse remodeling with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device measured by left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions and severity of mitral regurgitation.

Jeffrey A Morgan1, Robert J Brewer, Hassan W Nemeh, Raghav Murthy, Celeste T Williams, David E Lanfear, Cristina Tita, Gaetano Paone.   

Abstract

Pulsatile flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) maximally unload the left ventricle (LV), leading to reverse remodeling of the myopathic LV that manifests as decreased LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and decreased severity of mitral regurgitation (MR). There is a paucity of data, however, regarding the ability of continuous flow (CF) pumps to adequately decompress the LV to induce similar reverse remodeling. We sought to evaluate the effects of CF-LVADs on LV reverse remodeling. From March 2006 through July 2011, one hundred patients with chronic heart failure underwent implantation of CF-LVAD (93 HeartMate II LVADs and seven HeartWare LVADs) as bridge-to-transplant (n = 68) and destination therapies (n = 32). Echocardiograms and right heart catheterizations were reviewed preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months post-LVAD implantation. Mean age was 52.1 ± 12.1 years; etiology of heart failure was ischemic cardiomyopathy in 34 patients and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in 66 patients. Median LVAD support time was 378.3 days; 371.5 days for patients who received bridge-to-transplant therapy and 422.2 days for patients who underwent destination therapy. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension significantly decreased at 1 month post-LVAD implantation from 71.6 ± 12.4 to 58.3 ± 13.8 mm (p < 0.001). Severity of MR also significantly decreased from 76.0% of patients having moderate or severe MR preoperatively to 8.0% with moderate or severe MR at 1 month post-LVAD (p < 0.001). These reductions were maintained at 6 months. These data demonstrate the ability of a CF-LVAD to significantly decompress the LV, leading to significant reductions in LVEDD and severity of MR. This reverse remodeling was apparent in the early postoperative period and was sustained at 6 months. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether this correlates with clinical LV recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23103696     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31826e4267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  11 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Simultaneous procedures during left ventricular assist device implantation: is less always more?

Authors:  Nikhil Jaik; Robert S D Higgins; Bryan A Whitson
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

Review 3.  Role of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices: the Importance of Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Luca Longobardo; Christopher Kramer; Scipione Carerj; Concetta Zito; Renuka Jain; Valentin Suma; Vinay Thohan; Nasir Sulemanjee; Frank X Downey; Bijoy K Khandheria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Impact of mitral valve intervention with left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative outcomes and morphologic change.

Authors:  Hiroki Hata; Tomoyuki Fujita; Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda; Kensuke Kuroda; Osamu Seguchi; Yorihiko Matsumoto; Masanobu Yanase; Takuma Sato; Seiko Nakajima; Norihide Fukushima; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Clinical implications of hemodynamic assessment during left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effect of concomitant mitral valve procedures for severe mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Masashi Kawabori; Chitaru Kurihara; Ryan T Conyer; Andre C Critsinelis; Tadahisa Sugiura; Todd Rosengart; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Eliminating Regurgitation Reduces Fibrotic Remodeling of Functional Mitral Regurgitation Conditioned Valves.

Authors:  Patrick S Connell; Dragoslava P Vekilov; Christine M Diaz; Seulgi E Kim; K Jane Grande-Allen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Hemodynamic Effects of Concomitant Mitral Valve Surgery and Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Jerry Nnanabu; Daniel Rodgers; Jayant Raikehlkar; Sara Kalantar; Bryan Smith; Ann Nguyen; Ben Chung; Nikhil Narang; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; Daniel Burkhoff; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Gene Kim; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.826

9.  Cardiac contractile dysfunction and protein kinase C-mediated myofilament phosphorylation in disease and aging.

Authors:  Vani S Ravichandran; Himanshu J Patel; Francis D Pagani; Margaret V Westfall
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 10.  Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Valeria Lo Coco; Maria Elena De Piero; Giulio Massimi; Giovanni Chiarini; Giuseppe M Raffa; Mariusz Kowalewski; Jos Maessen; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.