Literature DB >> 29655965

Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System.

Mark P Hehir1, Cande V Ananth2, Zainab Siddiq3, Karen Flood4, Alexander M Friedman3, Mary E D'Alton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cesarean delivery has increased steadily in the United States over recent decades with significant downstream health consequences. The World Health Organization has endorsed the Robson 10-Group Classification System as a global standard to facilitate analysis and comparison of cesarean delivery rates.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to apply the Robson 10-Group Classification System to a nationwide cohort in the United States over a 10-year period. STUDY
DESIGN: This population-based analysis applied the Robson 10-Group Classification System to all births in the United States from 2005 through 2014, recorded in the 2003 revised birth certificate format. Over the study 10-year period, 27,044,217 deliveries met inclusion criteria. Five parameters (parity including previous cesarean, gestational age, labor onset, fetal presentation, and plurality), identifiable on presentation for delivery, were used to classify all women included into 1 of 10 groups.
RESULTS: The overall cesarean rate was 31.6%. Group-3 births (singleton, term, cephalic multiparas in spontaneous labor) were most common, while group-5 births (those with a previous cesarean) accounted for the most cesarean deliveries increasing from 27% of all cesareans in 2005 through 2006 to >34% in 2013 through 2014. Breech pregnancies (groups 6 and 7) had cesarean rates >90%. Primiparous and multiparous women who had a prelabor cesarean (groups 2b and 4b) accounted for over one quarter of all cesarean deliveries.
CONCLUSION: Women with a previous cesarean delivery represent an increasing proportion of cesarean deliveries. Use of the Robson criteria allows standardized comparisons of data and identifies clinical scenarios driving changes in cesarean rates. Hospitals and health organizations can use the Robson 10-Group Classification System to evaluate quality and processes associated with cesarean delivery.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  10 groups; Robson; United States; cesarean delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29655965     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  16 in total

1.  Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.

Authors:  Denise Colter Smith; Julia C Phillippi; Nancy K Lowe; Rachel Blankstein Breman; Nicole S Carlson; Jeremy L Neal; Eric Gutierrez; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Health Outcomes Associated With Clinician-initiated Delivery for Hypertensive Disorders at 34-38 Weeks' Gestation.

Authors:  David A Savitz; Valery A Danilack; Jerson Cochancela; Brenna L Hughes; Dwight J Rouse; Roee Gutmann
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Clinical impact of rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for group B Streptococcus (GBS) in term women with ruptured membranes.

Authors:  Enya F Fullston; Michael J Doyle; Mary F Higgins; Susan J Knowles
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammed Walid Zimmo; Katariina Laine; Sahar Hassan; Bettina Bottcher; Erik Fosse; Hadil Ali-Masri; Kaled Zimmo; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Marit Lieng; Åse Vikanes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A comparison of risk factors for breech presentation in preterm and term labor: a nationwide, population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Anna E Toijonen; Seppo T Heinonen; Mika V M Gissler; Georg Macharey
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.

Authors:  H Cammu; E Martens; G Van Maele
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2020-11-12

7.  The Robson classification for caesarean section-A proposed method based on routinely collected health data.

Authors:  Karen Triep; Nenad Torbica; Luigi Raio; Daniel Surbek; Olga Endrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Out-of-Hospital Cervical Ripening With a Synthetic Hygroscopic Cervical Dilator May Reduce Hospital Costs and Cesarean Sections in the United States-A Cost-Consequence Analysis.

Authors:  Sita J Saunders; Rhodri Saunders; Tess Wong; Antonio F Saad
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  Trends in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white cesarean delivery rates on the US-Mexico border, 2000-2015.

Authors:  Jill A McDonald; Anup Amatya; Charlotte C Gard; Jesus Sigala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cesarean section rates in Brazil: Trend analysis using the Robson classification system.

Authors:  Edson Luciano Rudey; Maria do Carmo Leal; Guilhermina Rego
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.