Literature DB >> 22324777

Mass discharge in a tracer plume: evaluation of the Theissen Polygon Method.

Douglas M Mackay1, Murray D Einarson, Phil M Kaiser, Mamie Nozawa-Inoue, Sham Goyal, Irina Chakraborty, Ehsan Rasa, Kate M Scow.   

Abstract

A tracer plume was created within a thin aquifer by injection for 299 d of two adjacent "sub-plumes" to represent one type of plume heterogeneity encountered in practice. The plume was monitored by snapshot sampling of transects of fully screened wells. The mass injection rate and total mass injected were known. Using all wells in each transect (0.77 m well spacing, 1.4 points/m(2) sampling density), the Theissen Polygon Method (TPM) yielded apparently accurate mass discharge (M(d) ) estimates at three transects for 12 snapshots. When applied to hypothetical sparser transects using subsets of the wells with average spacing and sampling density from 1.55 to 5.39 m and 0.70 to 0.20 points/m(2) , respectively, the TPM accuracy depended on well spacing and location of the wells in the hypothesized transect with respect to the sub-plumes. Potential error was relatively low when the well spacing was less than the widths of the sub-plumes (>0.35 points/m(2) ). Potential error increased for well spacing similar to or greater than the sub-plume widths, or when less than 1% of the plume area was sampled. For low density sampling of laterally heterogeneous plumes, small changes in groundwater flow direction can lead to wide fluctuations in M(d) estimates by the TPM. However, sampling conducted when flow is known or likely to be in a preferred direction can potentially allow more useful comparisons of M(d) over multiyear time frames, such as required for performance evaluation of natural attenuation or engineered remediation systems.
© 2012, The Author(s). Ground Water © 2012, National Ground Water Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22324777      PMCID: PMC3862899          DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00912.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  9 in total

1.  Predicting impacts of ground water contamination.

Authors:  M D Einarson; D M Mackay
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Increasing confidence in mass discharge estimates using geostatistical methods.

Authors:  Zuansi Cai; Ryan D Wilson; Michael A Cardiff; Peter K Kitanidis
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  A field comparison of BTEX mass flow rates based on integral pumping tests and point scale measurements.

Authors:  Michael Dietze; Peter Dietrich
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Estimating contaminant mass discharge: a field comparison of the multilevel point measurement and the integral pumping investigation approaches and their uncertainties.

Authors:  Caroline Béland-Pelletier; Michelle Fraser; Jim Barker; Thomas Ptak
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Contaminant mass discharge estimation in groundwater based on multi-level point measurements: a numerical evaluation of expected errors.

Authors:  Markus Kübert; Michael Finkel
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Contaminant plume classification system based on mass discharge.

Authors:  Charles J Newell; Shahla K Farhat; David T Adamson; Brian B Looney
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Impact of ethanol on the natural attenuation of benzene, toluene, and o-xylene in a normally sulfate-reducing aquifer.

Authors:  Douglas M Mackay; Nicholas R de Sieyes; Murray D Einarson; Kevin P Feris; Alexander A Pappas; Isaac A Wood; Lisa Jacobson; Larry G Justice; Mark N Noske; Kate M Scow; John T Wilson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Mass and flux distributions from DNAPL zones in sandy aquifers.

Authors:  Martin A Guilbeault; Beth L Parker; John A Cherry
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Role of back diffusion and biodegradation reactions in sustaining an MTBE/TBA plume in alluvial media.

Authors:  Ehsan Rasa; Steven W Chapman; Barbara A Bekins; Graham E Fogg; Kate M Scow; Douglas M Mackay
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.188

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Source strength functions from long-term monitoring data and spatially distributed mass discharge measurements.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; A Lynn Wood; Jaehyun Cho; Christine A P Williams; William Brandon; Michael D Annable
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Effect of different transport observations on inverse modeling results: case study of a long-term groundwater tracer test monitored at high resolution.

Authors:  Ehsan Rasa; Laura Foglia; Douglas M Mackay; Kate M Scow
Journal:  Hydrogeol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.178

3.  Impacts of an ethanol-blended fuel release on groundwater and fate of produced methane: Simulation of field observations.

Authors:  Ehsan Rasa; Barbara A Bekins; Douglas M Mackay; Nicholas R de Sieyes; John T Wilson; Kevin P Feris; Isaac A Wood; Kate M Scow
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.240

4.  In Situ Biotreatment of TBA with Recirculation/Oxygenation.

Authors:  Katharine P North; Douglas M Mackay; Julian S Kayne; Daniel Petersen; Ehsan Rasa; Laleh Rastegarzadeh; Reef B Holland; Kate M Scow
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.019

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.