| Literature DB >> 30360767 |
Lingcai Kong1, Chengdong Xu2, Pengfei Mu3, Jialiang Li3, Senyue Qiu3, Haixia Wu4.
Abstract
Dengue fever (DF) has been a growing public-health concern in China since its emergence in Guangdong Province in 1978. Of all the regions that have experienced dengue outbreaks in mainland China, the city of Guangzhou is the most affected. This study aims to investigate the potential risk factors for dengue virus (DENV) transmission in Guangzhou, China, from 2006 to 2014. The impact of risk factors on DENV transmission was qualified by the q-values calculated using a novel spatial-temporal method, the GeoDetector model. Both climatic and socioeconomic factors were considered. The impacts on DF incidence of each single factor and the interaction of two factors were analysed. The results show that the number of days with rainfall of the month before last has the highest determinant power, with a q-value of 0.898 (P < 0.01); the q-values of the other factors related to temperature and precipitation were around 0.38-0.50. Integrating a Pearson correlation analysis, nonlinear associations were found between the DF incidence in Guangzhou and the climatic factors considered. The coupled impact of the different variables considered was enhanced compared with their individual effects. In addition, an increased number of tourists in the city were associated with a high incidence of DF. This study demonstrates that the number of rain days in a month has great influence on the DF incidence of the month after next; the temperature and precipitation have nonlinear impacts on the DF incidence in Guangzhou; both the domestic and overseas tourists coming to the city increase the risk of DENV transmission. These findings are useful in the risk assessment of DENV transmission, to predict DF outbreaks and to implement preventive DF reduction strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Dengue fever; GeoDetector; determinant power; risk factors
Year: 2018 PMID: 30360767 PMCID: PMC6518558 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268818002820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Infect ISSN: 0950-2688 Impact factor: 2.451
Fig. 1.Geographic location of Guangdong Province and Guangzhou city in China, and meteorological stations used to interpolate the meteorological data in Guangzhou.
Fig. 2.Guangzhou DF monthly cases from January 2006 to December 2014: (A) January 2007 to January 2013; (B) June 2006 to December 2006; (C) June 2013 to December 2013 and (D) June 2014 to December 2014.
Fig. 3.Potential risk factors to DF considered.
Fig. 4.Guangzhou monthly BI between January 2006 and December 2014.
Fig. 5.Guangzhou monthly mean, mean maximum and mean minimum temperatures between January 2006 and December 2014.
Fig. 6.Monthly precipitation (A), number of days with rainfall (B) and maximum daily precipitation (C) in Guangzhou between January 2006 and December 2014.
Fig. 7.Tourists coming to Guangzhou between January 2006 and December 2014.
Types of interaction between two factors
| Interactive effects | Condition |
|---|---|
| Weaken | |
| Weaken, univariate | |
| Weaken, nonlinear | |
| Enhance, bivariate | |
| Enhance, nonlinear | |
| Independent |
The symbol of “” means the interaction of two factors, and represents the q-value for the interaction between two factors X1 and X2.
Statistical description of incidence and potential risk factors of DF
| Variables | Mean ± | Quantiles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 95% | ||
| DF cases | 367.55 ± 2478.47 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7.5 | 453.6 |
| BI | 3.36 ± 2.26 | 0.67 | 1.62 | 2.92 | 4.58 | 7.80 |
| Mean temperature (°C) | 22.15 ± 5.69 | 12.74 | 17.55 | 23.12 | 27.59 | 29.08 |
| Mean max temperature (°C) | 26.78 ± 5.63 | 17.92 | 22.04 | 27.73 | 31.86 | 33.81 |
| Mean min temperature (°C) | 19.04 ± 5.77 | 9.30 | 14.82 | 20.28 | 24.71 | 25.84 |
| Precipitation (mm) | 163.76 ± 155.92 | 5.36 | 47.29 | 127.86 | 225.80 | 431.34 |
| Number of rainy days | 12.08 ± 6.24 | 2.35 | 6.41 | 12.35 | 17.25 | 21.11 |
| Max daily precipitation (mm) | 47.1 ± 34.79 | 3.86 | 18.10 | 41.91 | 64.63 | 112.84 |
| Ratio of urban to rural population | 9.17 ± 0.44 | 8.68 | 8.80 | 9.08 | 9.51 | 10.07 |
| Number of overseas tourists | 59.37 ± 16.63 | 40.97 | 46.72 | 55.10 | 62.91 | 90.30 |
| Number of domestic tourists | 293.22 ± 91.77 | 177.99 | 222.18 | 280.87 | 332.15 | 478.24 |
| Population density (person/km2) | 1611.53 ± 148.2 | 1340.61 | 1500.24 | 1709.57 | 1726.96 | 1759.46 |
‘s.d.’ denotes the standard deviation of the corresponding variable.
q-values for mosquito density index and climatic factors and their lags of month
| Factor | Months of lags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| BI | 0.595 | – | – | – |
| Mean temperature | 0.387 | 0.394 | 0.397 | 0.492 |
| Mean max temperature | 0.485 | 0.397 | 0.402 | 0.487 |
| Mean min temperature | 0.386 | 0.390 | 0.397 | 0.438 |
| Precipitation | 0.384 | 0.408 | 0.486 | 0.395 |
| Number of rainy days | 0.390 | 0.391 | 0.898 | 0.457 |
| Max daily precipitation | 0.384 | 0.486 | 0.486 | 0.387 |
Note: all the q-values are significant from zero with P < 0.05.
Pearson correlation coefficients between DF incidence and variables related to climate
| Factor | Months of lags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Mean temperature | 0.079# | 0.146# | 0.166* | 0.171* |
| Mean max temperature | 0.106# | 0.166* | 0.182* | 0.181* |
| Mean min temperature | 0.065# | 0.139# | 0.158# | 0.163* |
| Precipitation | −0.111# | 0.025 | 0.143# | 0.074# |
| Number of rainy days | −0.166* | −0.006# | 0.119# | 0.145# |
| Max daily precipitation | −0.126# | −0.001# | 0.070# | 0.020 |
#P > 0.1; *0.05 < P < 0.1.
The q-values for the interactive effect of different factors
| Factors | BI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI | |||||||||
| 0.595EB | |||||||||
| 0.994EB | 0.487EB | ||||||||
| 0.898EB | 0.439EB | 0.994EN | |||||||
| 0.994EB | 0.591EN | 0.994EN | 0.994EN | ||||||
| 0.899EB | 0.994EB | 0.994EB | 0.899EB | 0.994EB | |||||
| 0.994EB | 0.487EB | 0.994EN | 0.994EN | 0.994EN | 0.994EN | ||||
| 0.995EB | 0.489EB | 0.995EN | 0.995EN | 0.996EN | 0.996EB | 0.996EN | |||
| 0.994EB | 0.593EN | 0.994EN | 0.994EN | 0.994EN | 0.994EB | 0.994EN | 0.996EN |
EB, enhance (bivariate); EN, enhance (nonlinear).