Literature DB >> 30357305

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Final Recommendation Statement.

Susan J Curry1, Alex H Krist2,3, Douglas K Owens4,5, Michael J Barry6, Aaron B Caughey7, Karina W Davidson8, Chyke A Doubeni9, John W Epling10, David C Grossman11, Alex R Kemper12, Martha Kubik13, Ann Kurth14, C Seth Landefeld15, Carol M Mangione16, Michael Silverstein17, Melissa A Simon18, Chien-Wen Tseng19,20, John B Wong21.   

Abstract

Importance: Intimate partner violence (IPV) and abuse of older or vulnerable adults are common in the United States but often remain undetected. In addition to the immediate effects of IPV, such as injury and death, there are other health consequences, many with long-term effects, including development of mental health conditions such as depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and suicidal behavior; sexually transmitted infections; unintended pregnancy; and chronic pain and other disabilities. Long-term negative health effects from elder abuse include death, higher risk of nursing home placement, and adverse psychological consequences. Objective: To update the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2013 recommendation on screening for IPV, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults. Evidence Review: The USPSTF commissioned a review of the evidence on screening for IPV in adolescents, women, and men; for elder abuse; and for abuse of vulnerable adults. Findings: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for IPV in women of reproductive age and providing or referring women who screen positive to ongoing support services has a moderate net benefit. There is adequate evidence that available screening instruments can identify IPV in women. The evidence does not support the effectiveness of brief interventions or the provision of information about referral options in the absence of ongoing supportive intervention components. The evidence demonstrating benefit of ongoing support services is predominantly found in studies of pregnant or postpartum women. The benefits and harms of screening for elder abuse and abuse of vulnerable adults are uncertain, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. Conclusions and Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends that clinicians screen for IPV in women of reproductive age and provide or refer women who screen positive to ongoing support services. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for abuse and neglect in all older or vulnerable adults. (I statement).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30357305     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.14741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  43 in total

1.  The intersection of intimate partner violence and HIV: detection, disclosure, discussion, and implications for treatment adherence.

Authors:  Tami P Sullivan
Journal:  Top Antivir Med       Date:  2019-05

2.  Intimate Partner Violence Screening Programs in the Veterans Health Administration: Informing Scale-up of Successful Practices.

Authors:  Katherine M Iverson; Omonyêlé Adjognon; Alessandra R Grillo; Melissa E Dichter; Cassidy A Gutner; Alison B Hamilton; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Megan R Gerber
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Intimate Partner Violence and Psychological Distress: Opportunities for Prevention and Early Intervention Among Emerging Adult Women.

Authors:  Kelly C Young-Wolff; Brigid McCaw
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence and Beliefs About Partner Violence Screening Among Young Men.

Authors:  Tova B Walsh; Rita C Seabrook; Richard M Tolman; Shawna J Lee; Vijay Singh
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Screening for elder mistreatment in emergency departments: current progress and recommendations for next steps.

Authors:  Tony Rosen; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Terry Fulmer
Journal:  J Elder Abuse Negl       Date:  2020-06

6.  Hepatitis C virus screening trends: A 2016 update of the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Monica L Kasting; Anna R Giuliano; Richard R Reich; Richard G Roetzheim; Linh M Duong; Emmanuel Thomas; David R Nelson; Elizabeth Shenkman; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Middle-aged Women's Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Disclosure: "It's a private matter. It's an embarrassing situation".

Authors:  Melissa E Dichter; Lena Makaroun; Anaïs Tuepker; Gala True; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Katherine Iverson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The Roles of Alcohol Use Severity and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms as Risk Factors for Women's Intimate Partner Violence Experiences.

Authors:  Colin T Mahoney; Katherine M Iverson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Trauma Exposure and Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Pregnant Women in Liberia.

Authors:  Katelyn M Sileo; Trace S Kershaw; Shantesica Gilliam; Erica Taylor; Apoorva Kommajosula; Tamora A Callands
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2019-10-18

10.  High sensitivity and specificity screening for clinically significant intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Katherine J W Baucom; Shu Xu; Amy M Smith Slep; Jeffery D Snarr; Heather M Foran; Michael F Lorber; Alexandra K Wojda; David J Linkh
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2020-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.