Literature DB >> 32673030

High sensitivity and specificity screening for clinically significant intimate partner violence.

Richard E Heyman1, Katherine J W Baucom1, Shu Xu1, Amy M Smith Slep1, Jeffery D Snarr1, Heather M Foran1, Michael F Lorber1, Alexandra K Wojda2, David J Linkh3.   

Abstract

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended that clinicians screen patients for intimate partner violence (IPV). This article aims to develop and test the first screeners for clinically significant physical and psychological IPV (i.e., acts meeting criteria in the International Classification of Diseases (11th ed.; ICD-11; World Health Organization, 2019) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The goal was to derive screeners that (1) are maximally brief, while still achieving high sensitivity and specificity; (2) assess perpetration and victimization when either men or women are reporting; and (3) use ICD-11/DSM-5 criteria as the reference standard. Random samples of active duty service members at 82 installations worldwide were obtained via e-mail invitation (2006: N = 54,543; 2008: N = 48,909); their response rates were excellent for long general population surveys with no payment (2006: 44.7%, 2008: 49.0%). The population of spouses at the participating installation was invited by mailed postcard (2006: N = 19,722; 2008: N = 12,127; response rates-2006: 12.3%, 2008: 10.8%). Clinically significant physical intimate partner violence can be effectively screened with as few as four items, with sensitivities > 90% and specificities > 95%; clinically significant psychological intimate partner violence can be screened with two items. Men and women can be screened with equivalent accuracy, as can those committing the violence and those victimized by it. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32673030      PMCID: PMC7906486          DOI: 10.1037/fam0000781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  46 in total

1.  Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department.

Authors:  K M Feldhaus; J Koziol-McLain; H L Amsbury; I M Norton; S R Lowenstein; J T Abbott
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Detecting ongoing intimate partner violence in the emergency department using a simple 4-question screen: the OVAT.

Authors:  Amy A Ernst; Steven J Weiss; Elaine Cham; Louise Hall; Todd G Nick
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2004-06

3.  Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.

Authors:  Janette L Funk; Ronald D Rogge
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2007-12

4.  Accuracy and Acceptability of a Screening Tool for Identifying Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration among Women Veterans: A Pre-Implementation Evaluation.

Authors:  Galina A Portnoy; Sally G Haskell; Matthew W King; Rachel Maskin; Megan R Gerber; Katherine M Iverson
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2018-06-07

5.  Challenges and Opportunities for Studying Routine Screening for Abuse.

Authors:  Karin V Rhodes; Melissa E Dichter; Kristofer L Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence.

Authors:  Claudia Garcia-Moreno; Henrica A F M Jansen; Mary Ellsberg; Lori Heise; Charlotte H Watts
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Integrating intimate partner violence assessment and intervention into healthcare in the United States: a systems approach.

Authors:  Elizabeth Miller; Brigid McCaw; Betsy L Humphreys; Connie Mitchell
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Final Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Susan J Curry; Alex H Krist; Douglas K Owens; Michael J Barry; Aaron B Caughey; Karina W Davidson; Chyke A Doubeni; John W Epling; David C Grossman; Alex R Kemper; Martha Kubik; Ann Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Chien-Wen Tseng; John B Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Barriers to screening for intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Sheila Sprague; Kim Madden; Nicole Simunovic; Katelyn Godin; Ngan K Pham; Mohit Bhandari; J C Goslings
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2012

10.  Screening on perpetration and victimization of intimate partner violence (IPV): two studies on the validity of an IPV screening instrument in patients in substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Fleur L Kraanen; Ellen Vedel; Agnes Scholing; Paul M G Emmelkamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.