Melissa E Dichter1,2, Lena Makaroun3,4, Anaïs Tuepker5,6, Gala True7,8, Ann Elizabeth Montgomery9,10, Katherine Iverson11,12. 1. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. melissa.dichter@temple.edu. 2. Temple University School of Social Work, Philadelphia, PA, USA. melissa.dichter@temple.edu. 3. VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA. 6. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 7. South Central MIRECC, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA, USA. 8. Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. 9. Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA. 10. University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA. 11. Women's Health Sciences Division of the National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. 12. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: National guidelines indicate that healthcare providers should routinely screen women of reproductive age for experience of intimate partner violence. We know little about intimate partner violence (IPV) screening and disclosure experience among women older than reproductive age. OBJECTIVE: To examine the perspectives of middle-aged women who had experienced past-year IPV regarding IPV screening and disclosure in the healthcare setting. DESIGN: Individual semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in-person as part of a larger study examining IPV screening and response services through the Veterans Health Administration. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven women aged 45-64 (mean age 53) who experienced past-year IPV and received care at one of two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. APPROACH: Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Data were sorted and analyzed using templated notes and line-by-line coding, based on codes developed by the study team through an initial review of the data. Themes were derived from further analysis of the data coded for "screening" and "disclosure" for respondents aged 45 and older. KEY RESULTS: Barriers to disclosure of IPV to a healthcare provider included as follows: (a) feelings of shame, stigma, and/or embarrassment about experiencing IPV; (b) screening context not feeling comfortable or supportive, including lack of comfort with or trust in the provider and/or a perception that screening was conducted in a way that felt impersonal and uncaring; and (c) concerns about privacy and safety related to disclosure. Provider demonstrations of care, empathy, and support facilitated disclosure and feelings of empowerment following disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Middle-aged women may benefit from routine IPV screening and response in the healthcare setting. Such interventions should be sensitive to concerns regarding stigma and privacy that may be prevalent among this population.
BACKGROUND: National guidelines indicate that healthcare providers should routinely screen women of reproductive age for experience of intimate partner violence. We know little about intimate partner violence (IPV) screening and disclosure experience among women older than reproductive age. OBJECTIVE: To examine the perspectives of middle-aged women who had experienced past-year IPV regarding IPV screening and disclosure in the healthcare setting. DESIGN: Individual semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in-person as part of a larger study examining IPV screening and response services through the Veterans Health Administration. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven women aged 45-64 (mean age 53) who experienced past-year IPV and received care at one of two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. APPROACH: Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Data were sorted and analyzed using templated notes and line-by-line coding, based on codes developed by the study team through an initial review of the data. Themes were derived from further analysis of the data coded for "screening" and "disclosure" for respondents aged 45 and older. KEY RESULTS: Barriers to disclosure of IPV to a healthcare provider included as follows: (a) feelings of shame, stigma, and/or embarrassment about experiencing IPV; (b) screening context not feeling comfortable or supportive, including lack of comfort with or trust in the provider and/or a perception that screening was conducted in a way that felt impersonal and uncaring; and (c) concerns about privacy and safety related to disclosure. Provider demonstrations of care, empathy, and support facilitated disclosure and feelings of empowerment following disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Middle-aged women may benefit from routine IPV screening and response in the healthcare setting. Such interventions should be sensitive to concerns regarding stigma and privacy that may be prevalent among this population.
Authors: Cynthia Feltner; Ina Wallace; Nancy Berkman; Christine E Kistler; Jennifer Cook Middleton; Collen Barclay; Laura Higginbotham; Joshua T Green; Daniel E Jonas Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Melissa E Dichter; Anneliese E Sorrentino; Terri N Haywood; Anaïs Tuepker; Summer Newell; Meagan Cusack; Gala True Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2019-05-06
Authors: Melissa E Dichter; Terri N Haywood; Anneliese E Butler; Scarlett L Bellamy; Katherine M Iverson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Susan J Curry; Alex H Krist; Douglas K Owens; Michael J Barry; Aaron B Caughey; Karina W Davidson; Chyke A Doubeni; John W Epling; David C Grossman; Alex R Kemper; Martha Kubik; Ann Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Chien-Wen Tseng; John B Wong Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Katherine M Iverson; Kristin Huang; Stephanie Y Wells; Jason D Wright; Megan R Gerber; Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Sean Cowlishaw; Isabella Freijah; Dzenana Kartal; Alyssa Sbisa; Ashlee Mulligan; MaryAnn Notarianni; Anne-Laure Couineau; David Forbes; Meaghan O'Donnell; Andrea Phelps; Katherine M Iverson; Alexandra Heber; Carol O'Dwyer; Patrick Smith; Fardous Hosseiny Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 4.614