| Literature DB >> 30356034 |
Min Jiang1, Haoyue Lu2, Chao Lu1, Xingdong Geng1, Yingjun Jia1, Peng Wang1, Wei Qian3, Hao Huang1, Xiuhong Shan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL-NT) is difficult to distinguish from nasal polyps and inverted papilloma, leading to its high misdiagnosis ratio. The aim of this study was to investigate its potential prognostic indicators. MATERIAL AND METHODS Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) rate. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze risk ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Nasal ala infiltration and nasal floor thickness >2.0 mm or nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm were potential prognostic factors for OS (p=0.0323 and 0.0072, respectively). Cox proportional-hazards regression indicated that high LMP1 expression and the nasal floor thickness >2.0 mm or nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm were the independent risk factors for poor OS of ENKTL-NT (HR=3.0655, p=0.028; HR=2.3650, p=0.0452, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, the OS rate was lower when the nasal floor thickness >2.0 mm or nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm in the patients who had high expression of LMP1 (p=0.0651), whereas high LMP1 expression increased the risk of worse prognostic outcome in patients with deep infiltration thickness. Thus, high LMP1 expression may contribute to the tissue invasion of ENKTL-NT. CONCLUSIONS Any patient with nasal ala soft-tissue invasion, nasal floor thickness >2.0 mm/nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm on CT imaging or high LMP1 expression should prompt immediate histopathologic diagnosis to rule out ENKTL-NT in clinical practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30356034 PMCID: PMC6213871 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.909152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Demographic details.
| Total number of patients | Age (mean ± sd) | Male: Female | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENKTL | 52 | 52.83±13.69 | 7: 6 (53.8% Male) |
| Nasal polyps | 134 | 47±15.65 | 85: 49 (63% Male) |
| Inverted papilloma | 24 | 54.08±10.72 | 14: 10 (58.3% Male) |
Difference in CT imaging finding between ENKTL and nasal polyps.
| ENKTL (n=52) | Nasal polyps (n=134) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor location | |||
| Unilateral | 43 | 39 | p=0.000 |
| Bilateral | 9 | 95 | |
| Tumor density | |||
| Heterogeneous | 21 | 48 | p=0.339 |
| Homogeneous | 31 | 86 | |
| Bone remodeling | |||
| Bone sclerosis | 8 | 13 | p=0.305 |
| Bone erosion | 10 | 9 | p=0.016 |
| Tumor morphology | |||
| Polypoid | 35 | 46 | p=0.000 |
| Infiltrative | 17 | 88 | |
| Sinus involvement | |||
| Maxillary | 50 | 130 | p=0.673 |
| Ethmoid | 48 | 113 | p=0.205 |
| Frontal | 28 | 96 | p=0.025 |
| Sphenoid | 16 | 59 | p=0.133 |
| Soft tissue infiltration | |||
| Nasal vestibule | 47 | 58 | p=0.000 |
| Choana & nasopharynx | 1 | 50 | p=0.000 |
| Nasal ala | 28 | 2 | p=0.000 |
| Nasopharyngeal wall | 9 | 1 | P=0.000 |
| Nasal floor thickness >2.0 mmor nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm | 28 | 8 | P=0.000 |
Difference in CT imaging findings between ENKTL and inverted papilloma.
| ENKT (n=52) | Inverted papilloma (n=24) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor location | 43 | 23 | p=0.156 |
| Unilateral | 9 | 1 | |
| Bilateral | |||
| Tumor density | 21 | 10 | p=1.000 |
| Heterogeneous | 31 | 14 | |
| Homogeneous | |||
| Bone remodeling | 8 | 8 | p=0.128 |
| Bone sclerosis | 10 | 2 | p=0.319 |
| Bone erosion | |||
| Tumor morphology | 17 | 23 | p=0.000 |
| Polypoid | 35 | 1 | |
| Infiltrative | |||
| Sinus involvement | 50 | 20 | p=0.075 |
| Maxillary | 48 | 18 | p=0.064 |
| Ethmoid | 28 | 10 | p=0.46 |
| Frontal | 16 | 5 | p=0.42 |
| Sphenoid | |||
| Soft tissue infiltration | 47 | 6 | p=0.000 |
| Nasal vestibule | 1 | 14 | p=0.000 |
| Choana & nasopharynx | 28 | 0 | p=0.000 |
| Nasal ala | 9 | 0 | p=0.051 |
| Nasopharyngeal wall | 28 | 0 | p=0.000 |
| Nasal floor thickness >2.0 mmor nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm |
Figure 1(A) Axial CT scan of a 47-year-old man with ENKTL-NT and a left-sided nasal mass (red arrow); (B) Axial CT scan of a 38-year-old with ENKTL-NT having homogeneous enhancement of left nasal cavity mass with invasion of nasal ala (red arrow); (C) Coronal CT scan of a 47-year-old man with ENKTL-NT having nasal septum and inferior turbinate erosion (red arrow); (D) Axial CT scan of a 48-year-old man, with a polypoidal mass seen in the left nasal cavity in ENKTL-NT (red arrow); (E) Axial scan of a 60-year-old man with ENKTL-NT, right-sided nasal mass in the nasal cavity, and involvement of the maxillary sinus (red arrow); (F) Axial CT scan of a 63-year-old woman with ENKTL-NT, bilateral nasal cavity mass and infiltration of the nasal ala (red arrow), small bubbles in lesion area (white arrow).
The response to treatment.
| Response to treatment | Total number of patients | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| CR | 27 | 51.9 |
| PR | 21 | 40.4 |
| NR | 4 | 7.7 |
CR – complete remission; PR – partial remission; NR – no response.
Figure 2(A) Negative IHC staining of adjacent normal tissue. (B) Weak IHC staining for LMP1 in ENKTL-NT samples. (C) Strong IHC staining for LMP1 in ENKTL-NT samples.
Association of LMP1 expression with clinical features.
| High | Low | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 15 (14) | 13 (14) | 1.000 (0.788) |
| Female | 14 (13) | 10 (11) | |
| Age | |||
| ≤50 | 9 (6) | 7 (6) | 1.000 (1.000) |
| >50 | 20 (21) | 16 (19) | |
| IPI | |||
| Low/Low-intermediate | 21 (22) | 16 (19) | 0.548 (0.74) |
| High-intermediate/High | 8 (5) | 7 (6) | |
| Prognosis | |||
| Live | 6 (5) | 16 (20) | 0.001 (<0.001) |
| Dead | 23 (22) | 7 (5) | |
Data in “()” were from IHC for LMP1 expression.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with ENKTL-NT according to nasal ala infiltration at CT imaging (A), infiltration thickness > or < at CT imaging (nasal floor thickness >2.0 mm or nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm) (B) and high/low LMP1 expression (C).
Results of multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for OS in patients with ENKTL-NT.
| Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | p Value | |
| High LMP1 expression | 3.0655 (1.1344 to 0.82841) | 0.028 |
| Nasal ala infiltration | 1.1875 (0.5095 to 2.7678) | 0.692 |
| Nasal floor thickness >2 mm or nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm | 2.3650 (1.0229 to 5.4683) | 0.0452 |
| Nasopharyngeal wall | 0.4520 (0.115 to 1.1708) | 0.2565 |
| Nasal vestibule | 1.1708 (0.2268 to 6.0438) | 0.8514 |
Figure 4(A) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival for the ENKTL-NT patients with nasal floor thickness > 2.0 mm or nasal septum thickness >2.5 mm according to LMP1 expression; (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival for the ENKTL-NT patients with high LMP1 expression according to infiltration thickness.