Literature DB >> 30354588

Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Replacement.

Leonardo de Freitas Campos Guimarães1, Marina Urena2, Harindra C Wijeysundera3, Antonio Munoz-Garcia4, Vicenç Serra5, Luis M Benitez6, Vincent Auffret7, Asim N Cheema8, Ignacio J Amat-Santos9, Quentin Fisher2, Dominique Himbert2, Bruno Garcia Del Blanco5, Antonio Dager6, Hervé Le Breton7, Jean-Michel Paradis1, Eric Dumont1, Philippe Pibarot1, Josep Rodés-Cabau1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on long-term outcomes after valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are scarce. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term clinical outcomes and structural valve degeneration (SVD) over time in patients undergoing ViV-TAVR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing ViV-TAVR in 9 centers between 2009 and 2015 were included. Patients were followed yearly, and clinical and echocardiography data were collected prospectively. SVD was defined as subclinical (increase >10 mm Hg in mean transvalvular gradient+decrease >0.3 cm2 in valve area or new-onset mild or moderate aortic regurgitation) and clinically relevant (increase >20 mm Hg in mean transvalvular gradient+decrease >0.6 cm2 in valve area or new-onset moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation). A total of 116 patients (mean age, 76±11 years; 64.7% male; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, 8.0±5.1%) were included. Balloon- and self-expandable valves were used in 47.9% and 52.1% of patients, respectively, and 30-day mortality was 6.9%. At a median follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-7 years), 30 patients (25.9%) had died, 20 of them (17.2%) from cardiovascular causes. Average mean transvalvular gradients remained stable up to 5-year follow-up ( P=0.92), but clinically relevant SVD occurred in 3/99 patients (3.0%), and 15/99 patients (15.1%) had subclinical SVD. One patient with SVD had redo ViV-TAVR.
CONCLUSIONS: About one-fourth of ViV-TAVR recipients had died after a median follow-up of 3 years. Overall valve hemodynamics remained stable over time and clinically relevant SVD was infrequent, but 1 out of 10 patients exhibited some degree of SVD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioprosthesis; echocardiography; hemodynamics; standard of care; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30354588     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evolving Indications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Going.

Authors:  Jules Mesnier; Vassili Panagides; Jorge Nuche; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdallah El Sabbagh; Mohammed Al-Hijji; Mayra Guerrero
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Balloon-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses: clinical and echocardiographic long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Victor X Mosquera; Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera; Yago Vilela-González; Carlos Velasco; Jorge Salgado-Fernández; Ramón Calviño-Santos; Nicolás Vázquez-González; José M Vázquez-Rodríguez; José M Herrera-Noreña
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

4.  Temporal Trends on Percutaneous Mitral Commissurotomy: 30 Years of Experience.

Authors:  Cyrielle Desnos; Bernard Iung; Dominique Himbert; Grégory Ducrocq; Marina Urena; Bertrand Cormier; Eric Brochet; Phalla Ou; Alec Vahanian; Claire Bouleti
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 5.  Advanced Heart Failure and End-Stage Heart Failure: Does a Difference Exist.

Authors:  Paolo Severino; Paul J Mather; Mariateresa Pucci; Andrea D'Amato; Marco Valerio Mariani; Fabio Infusino; Lucia Ilaria Birtolo; Viviana Maestrini; Massimo Mancone; Francesco Fedele
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01

6.  Short- and Long-Term Outcome after Emergent Cardiac Surgery during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Fei Li; Xu Wang; Yuetang Wang; Xuan Li; Shihua Zhao; Yongjian Wu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.520

7.  Bioprosthetic aortic valve diameter and thickness are directly related to leaflet fluttering: Results from a combined experimental and computational modeling study.

Authors:  Jae H Lee; Lawrence N Scotten; Robert Hunt; Thomas G Caranasos; John P Vavalle; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-09-21

8.  Mechanical Prosthesis X Biological Prosthesis: an Individualized and Shared Decision.

Authors:  João Ricardo C Fernandes; Roney Orismar Sampaio
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Structural Valve Deterioration after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using J-Valve: A Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Fei Li; Xu Wang; Yuetang Wang; Fei Xu; Xin Wang; Xuan Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.520

10.  Long term follow up of percutaneous treatment for degenerated Mitroflow prosthesis with self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Isaac Pascual; Marcel Almendárez; Rut Álvarez Velasco; Antonio Adeba; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Rebeca Lorca; Rocío Díaz; Alberto Alperi; Héctor Cubero-Gallego; Jose Rozado; César Morís; Pablo Avanzas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.