Literature DB >> 22638727

Conventional MRI does not reliably distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Abigail L Stockham1, Andrew L Tievsky, Shlomo A Koyfman, Chandana A Reddy, John H Suh, Michael A Vogelbaum, Gene H Barnett, Samuel T Chao.   

Abstract

Distinguishing radiation necrosis (RN) from tumor recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is challenging. This study assesses the sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) of an MRI-based parameter, the "lesion quotient" (LQ), in characterizing tumor progression from RN. Records of patients treated with SRS for brain metastases between 01/01/1999 and 12/31/2009 and with histopathologic analysis of a subsequent contrast enhancing enlarging lesion at the treated site at a single institution were examined. The LQ, the ratio of maximal nodular cross sectional area on T2-weighted imaging to the corresponding maximal cross sectional area of T1-contrast enhancement, was calculated by a neuroradiologist blinded to the histopathological outcome. Cutoffs of <0.3, 0.3-0.6, and >0.6 have been previously suggested to have correlated with RN, mixed findings and tumor recurrence, respectively. These cutoff values were evaluated for SN, SP, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Logistic regression analysis evaluated for associated clinical factors. For the 51 patients evaluated, the SN, SP, PPV and NPV for identifying RN (LQ < 0.3) were 8, 91, 25 and 73 %, respectively. For the combination of recurrent tumor and RN (LQ 0.3-0.6) the SN, SP, PPV and NPV were 0, 64, 0 and 83 %. The SN, SP, PPV and NPV of the LQ for recurrent tumor (LQ > 0.6) were 59, 41, 62 and 39 %, respectively. Standard MRI techniques do not reliably discriminate between tumor progression and RN after treatment with SRS for brain metastases. Additional imaging modalities are warranted to aid in distinguishing between these diagnoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22638727     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-012-0881-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  24 in total

Review 1.  Treatment induced necrosis versus recurrent/progressing brain tumor: going beyond the boundaries of conventional morphologic imaging.

Authors:  Rajan Jain; Jayant Narang; Pia M Sundgren; David Hearshen; Sona Saksena; Jack P Rock; Jorge Gutierrez; Tom Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hidefumi Aoyama; Hiroki Shirato; Masao Tago; Keiichi Nakagawa; Tatsuya Toyoda; Kazuo Hatano; Masahiro Kenjyo; Natsuo Oya; Saeko Hirota; Hiroki Shioura; Etsuo Kunieda; Taisuke Inomata; Kazushige Hayakawa; Norio Katoh; Gen Kobashi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Results of surgical resection for progression of brain metastases previously treated by gamma knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Minh T Truong; Eric G St Clair; Bernadine R Donahue; Stephen C Rush; Douglas C Miller; Silvia C Formenti; Edmond A Knopp; Kerry Han; John G Golfinos
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Gamma Knife radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumor: the usefulness of repeated Gamma Knife radiosurgery for recurrent cases.

Authors:  K Yamanaka; Y Iwai; T Yasui; H Nakajima; M Komiyama; M Nishikawa; T Morikawa; H Kishi
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  Diagnostic value of thallium-201 chloride single-photon emission computerized tomography in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation injury after gamma knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  Toru Serizawa; Naokatsu Saeki; Yosmhinori Higuchi; Junichi Ono; Shinji Matsuda; Makoto Sato; Masamichi Yanagisawa; Toshihiko Iuchi; Osamu Nagano; Akira Yamaura
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Resection of brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Giacomo G Vecil; Dima Suki; Marcos V C Maldaun; Frederick F Lang; Raymond Sawaya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Assessment of brain metastases with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial results.

Authors:  Marco Essig; Michael Waschkies; Frederik Wenz; J Debus; H R Hentrich; M V Knopp
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish the recurrence of metastatic brain tumors from radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Koichi Mitsuya; Yoko Nakasu; Satoshi Horiguchi; Hideyuki Harada; Tetsuo Nishimura; Etsuro Bando; Hiroto Okawa; Yoshihiro Furukawa; Tatsuo Hirai; Masahiro Endo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Diagnosis and treatment of progressive space-occupying radiation necrosis following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  T Kimura; K Sako; Y Tohyama; S Aizawa; H Yoshida; T Aburano; K Tanaka; T Tanaka
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Irradiated volume as a predictor of brain radionecrosis after linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Brian J Blonigen; Ryan D Steinmetz; Linda Levin; Michael A Lamba; Ronald E Warnick; John C Breneman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  46 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of PET, SPECT, and Arterial Spin-Labeling in Differentiating Tumor Recurrence from Necrosis in Cerebral Metastasis after Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  G Lai; A Mahadevan; D Hackney; P C Warnke; F Nigim; E Kasper; E T Wong; B S Carter; C C Chen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Radiation injury versus malignancy after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: impact of time-dependent changes in lesion morphology on MRI.

Authors:  Sabine Wagner; Heinrich Lanfermann; Gerrit Eichner; Hubert Gufler
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography differentiates brain metastasis recurrence from radiation injury after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Garry Ceccon; Philipp Lohmann; Gabriele Stoffels; Natalie Judov; Christian P Filss; Marion Rapp; Elena Bauer; Christina Hamisch; Maximilian I Ruge; Martin Kocher; Klaus Kuchelmeister; Bernd Sellhaus; Michael Sabel; Gereon R Fink; Nadim J Shah; Karl-Josef Langen; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Single-Isocenter Frameless Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiosurgery for Multiple Intracranial Metastases.

Authors:  Steven K M Lau; Kaveh Zakeri; Xiao Zhao; Ruben Carmona; Erik Knipprath; Daniel R Simpson; Sameer K Nath; Gwe-Ya Kim; Parag Sanghvi; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth; Clark C Chen; Kevin T Murphy
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Results of a questionnaire regarding practice patterns for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial radiation necrosis after SRS.

Authors:  Abigail L Stockham; Manmeet Ahluwalia; Chandana A Reddy; John H Suh; Aryavarta Kumar; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gene H Barnett; Erin S Murphy; Samuel T Chao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  The risk of radiation necrosis following stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent systemic therapies.

Authors:  Joseph M Kim; Jacob A Miller; Rupesh Kotecha; Roy Xiao; Aditya Juloori; Matthew C Ward; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Alireza M Mohammadi; David M Peereboom; Erin S Murphy; John H Suh; Gene H Barnett; Michael A Vogelbaum; Lilyana Angelov; Glen H Stevens; Samuel T Chao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Distinguishing True Progression From Radionecrosis After Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases With Machine Learning and Radiomics.

Authors:  Luke Peng; Vishwa Parekh; Peng Huang; Doris D Lin; Khadija Sheikh; Brock Baker; Talia Kirschbaum; Francesca Silvestri; Jessica Son; Adam Robinson; Ellen Huang; Heather Ames; Jimm Grimm; Linda Chen; Colette Shen; Michael Soike; Emory McTyre; Kristin Redmond; Michael Lim; Junghoon Lee; Michael A Jacobs; Lawrence Kleinberg
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery with adjuvant use of bevacizumab for heavily treated recurrent brain metastases: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Shoji Yomo; Motohiro Hayashi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Imaging changes following stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic intracranial tumors: differentiating pseudoprogression from tumor progression and its effect on clinical practice.

Authors:  Jacob Ruzevick; Lawrence Kleinberg; Daniele Rigamonti
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.