Andrew M King1, Shooshan Danagoulian2, Michael Lynch3,4, Nathan Menke5, Yijia Mu3, Melissa Saul3, Michael Abesamis3, Anthony F Pizon3,4. 1. Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. aking@dmc.org. 2. Department of Economics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA. 3. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Ohio Valley Medical Center, Wheeling, WV, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Morbidity and mortality from poison- and drug-related illness continue to rise in the USA. Medical toxicologists are specifically trained to diagnose and manage these patients. Inpatient medical toxicology services exist but their value-based economic benefits are not well established. METHODS: This was a retrospective study where length of stay (LOS) and payments received between a hospital with an inpatient medical toxicology service (TOX) and a similar hospital in close geographic proximity that does not have an inpatient toxicology service (NONTOX) were compared. Controlling for zip code, demographics and distance patients lived from each hospital, we used a fitted multivariate linear regression model to identify factors associated with changes in LOS and payment. RESULTS: Patients admitted to the TOX center had 0.87 days shorter LOS per encounter and the hospital received an average of $1800 more per patient encounter. CONCLUSION: In this study, the presence of an inpatient medical toxicology service was associated with decreased patient LOS and increased reimbursement for admitted patients. Differences may be attributable to improved direct patient care provided by medical toxicologists, but future prospective studies are needed.
INTRODUCTION: Morbidity and mortality from poison- and drug-related illness continue to rise in the USA. Medical toxicologists are specifically trained to diagnose and manage these patients. Inpatient medical toxicology services exist but their value-based economic benefits are not well established. METHODS: This was a retrospective study where length of stay (LOS) and payments received between a hospital with an inpatient medical toxicology service (TOX) and a similar hospital in close geographic proximity that does not have an inpatient toxicology service (NONTOX) were compared. Controlling for zip code, demographics and distance patients lived from each hospital, we used a fitted multivariate linear regression model to identify factors associated with changes in LOS and payment. RESULTS:Patients admitted to the TOX center had 0.87 days shorter LOS per encounter and the hospital received an average of $1800 more per patient encounter. CONCLUSION: In this study, the presence of an inpatient medical toxicology service was associated with decreased patient LOS and increased reimbursement for admitted patients. Differences may be attributable to improved direct patient care provided by medical toxicologists, but future prospective studies are needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Economics; Medical toxicology service; Quality of health care
Authors: Joseph Charles Blizzard; Jill E Michels; William H Richardson; Clairborne E Reeder; Richard M Schulz; Christopher P Holstege Journal: Clin Toxicol (Phila) Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.467