Literature DB >> 18568801

Cost-benefit analysis of a regional poison center.

Joseph Charles Blizzard1, Jill E Michels, William H Richardson, Clairborne E Reeder, Richard M Schulz, Christopher P Holstege.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Funding poison center (PC) operations has become a major challenge nationwide. Increasingly, state and federal budget cuts have resulted in diminished funding to PCs.
OBJECTIVES: In an effort to demonstrate the value of current PC phone services, a cost-benefit analysis of a regional center was completed.
METHODS: A telephone survey was used to collect data from PC callers during an 8-week period in 2004. Callers with human exposure poisonings determined by the PC to be of minimal or no risk were asked to complete the phone survey. Callers were asked their alternative plan if the PC staff had not been available to assist them. Benefits were measured as healthcare charges potentially avoided.
RESULTS: A total of 652 caller surveys were completed. The benefit-to-cost ratio was 7.67 (95% C.I. 6.83, 8.50).
CONCLUSION: In addition to non-monetary benefits, the operation of a regional poison center provides significant positive return on investment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18568801     DOI: 10.1080/15563650701616145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-3650            Impact factor:   4.467


  14 in total

1.  Characterization of Animal Exposure Calls Captured by the National Poison Data System, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Danielle E Buttke; Joshua G Schier; Alvin C Bronstein; Arthur Chang
Journal:  J Clin Toxicol       Date:  2012-01-22

2.  The value and evolving role of the U.S. Poison Control Center System.

Authors:  Henry A Spiller; Jill R K Griffith
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Telemedicine and toxicology: back to the future?

Authors:  Aaron Skolnik
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-09

4.  Comparison of incidence of hospital utilization for poisoning and other injury types.

Authors:  Henry A Spiller; Michael D Singleton
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Belgian Poison Centre impact on healthcare expenses of unintentional poisonings: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Anne-Marie K Descamps; Peter De Paepe; Walter A Buylaert; Martine A Mostin; Dominique M Vandijck
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Practice or perish: why bedside toxicology is essential to the survival of our specialty.

Authors:  Aaron Skolnik
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-03

7.  Effect of a medical toxicology admitting service on length of stay, cost, and mortality among inpatients discharged with poisoning-related diagnoses.

Authors:  Steven C Curry; Daniel E Brooks; Aaron B Skolnik; Richard D Gerkin; Stuart Glenn
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2015-03

8.  The virtual toxicology service: wearable head-mounted devices for medical toxicology.

Authors:  Peter R Chai; Roger Y Wu; Megan L Ranney; Paul S Porter; Kavita M Babu; Edward W Boyer
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2014-12

9.  The Effect of a Medical Toxicology Inpatient Service in an Academic Tertiary Care Referral Center.

Authors:  Andrew M King; Shooshan Danagoulian; Michael Lynch; Nathan Menke; Yijia Mu; Melissa Saul; Michael Abesamis; Anthony F Pizon
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-23

10.  Teletoxicology: Patient Assessment Using Wearable Audiovisual Streaming Technology.

Authors:  Aaron B Skolnik; Peter R Chai; Christian Dameff; Richard Gerkin; Jessica Monas; Angela Padilla-Jones; Steven Curry
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.