Literature DB >> 30353070

Comparative genomics of clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from different geographic sites.

Dinesh Subedi1, Ajay Kumar Vijay2, Gurjeet Singh Kohli3, Scott A Rice3,4,5, Mark Willcox2.   

Abstract

The large and complex genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which consists of significant portions (up to 20%) of transferable genetic elements contributes to the rapid development of antibiotic resistance. The whole genome sequences of 22 strains isolated from eye and cystic fibrosis patients in Australia and India between 1992 and 2007 were used to compare genomic divergence and phylogenetic relationships as well as genes for antibiotic resistance and virulence factors. Analysis of the pangenome indicated a large variation in the size of accessory genome amongst 22 stains and the size of the accessory genome correlated with number of genomic islands, insertion sequences and prophages. The strains were diverse in terms of sequence type and dissimilar to that of global epidemic P. aeruginosa clones. Of the eye isolates, 62% clustered together within a single lineage. Indian eye isolates possessed genes associated with resistance to aminoglycoside, beta-lactams, sulphonamide, quaternary ammonium compounds, tetracycline, trimethoprims and chloramphenicols. These genes were, however, absent in Australian isolates regardless of source. Overall, our results provide valuable information for understanding the genomic diversity of P. aeruginosa isolated from two different infection types and countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30353070      PMCID: PMC6199293          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34020-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

The diverse and dynamic genetic composition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa enables this Gram-negative bacterium to colonise various environments, including humans where it can cause opportunistic infections[1,2]. P. aeruginosa is particularly associated with infections that are caused due to impaired anatomical structures or a weakened immune system. Such infections include microbial keratitis (MK), ventilator-associated pneumonia, wound infections, and respiratory infections in patients suffering from cystic fibrosis (CF)[3-5]. Several reports have shown that the prevalence of such infections by multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains is increasing rapidly worldwide[6-9], which makes this bacterium difficult to treat and hence there is a high risk of mortality associated with infection by P. aeruginosa[10]. This pathogen has an exceptional capacity to develop resistance to antibiotics by the selection for genomic mutations and by exchange of transferable resistance determinants[11]. Knowledge of the genomic diversity of P. aeruginosa will help to understand differences in pathogenesis between strains and the mechanism of antibiotic resistance, which is important for controlling infections. The genome size of P. aeruginosa varies greatly, ranging from 5.5 to 7 Mbp[12,13]. Such variation arises due to the presence of a large accessory genome. Accessory genomes are strain specific blocks of DNA and can occupy up to 20% of the whole genome[14]. They are composed of horizontally transferable elements which include prophages, transposons, insertion sequences (IS), genomic islands (GI) and plasmids[15]. Accessory genomes are important for carrying virulence and acquired antibiotic resistance genes. The lateral transfer of those genes between strains contributes to the development of MDR virulent strains[16]. Furthermore, mutational changes of chromosomal genes can also contribute to virulence and antibiotic resistance[16,17]. Therefore, unraveling the genetic content of P. aeruginosa helps to understand the gene modifications that are associated with more pathogenic and more resistant strains. Several studies have reported a comparison between genomes of P. aeruginosa in different infections at various points of time during infections[16,18-21]. However, most of those studies have centered around CF isolates and there is very limited comparative genomics of ocular isolates of P. aeruginosa. This study aims to compare the genomic diversity between P. aeruginosa strains from MK and CF isolated in Australia and India. There are previous reports of genomic characterisation of Indian ocular isolates of P. aeruginosa[22-24]. A genotypic study of eye isolates of P. aeruginosa has shown that keratitis isolates from the UK are highly related[25]. However, information on genomic comparison amongst contemporary isolates of P. aeruginosa from eye infections in different geographical locations is still missing. This study focussed on 13 MK strains, which were isolated in India and Australia and nine strains from CF cases which were isolated in Australia. The whole genomes of all 22 strains were sequenced and a comparative genomic analysis was conducted to identify genomic divergence, evolutionary relationships, antibiotic resistance properties and virulence factors.

Results and Discussion

General features of genomes

A de novo assembly of the genomes of 22 P. aeruginosa strains generated a number of contigs from 56 in PA175 to 241 in PA37 (Median = 79). Like other published complete genomes of P. aeruginosa[1,19,26,27], a mean C + G content of 66.4% and size of 6.1 to 7.1 Mbp was observed in the draft genomes. The genomic size varied widely between strains showing up to 900 kbp more DNA than PAO1, which was taken as the reference strain in this study. Similarly, the number of coding sequences (CDS), which were determined based on Prokka annotation pipeline, ranged from 5584 (in PA92) to 6645 (in PA37). Amongst 82 complete genomes of P. aeruginosa listed in the Pseudomonas genome database (PGDB)[28] (accessed on 12/03/2018), PA92 has the lowest and PA37 has the second highest number of CDS. Wide variations in the tRNA copy numbers (65–73) per strain observed here is probably due to use of incomplete draft genome. In addition, different number of tRNAs in the same genome was observed when annotated using different pipelines. Table 1 shows the general features of the genomes.
Table 1

General features of the genomes of P. aeruginosa strains.

StrainsSequence type#No. of contigsLength (bp)GC (%)CDStRNAAccessory genes##
Eye/IndiaPA31308137710057866.026619691709
PA32308155710158966.016611691701
PA33308166709261766.026609691699
PA341284130688531465.956326661416
PA35308156709496066.026611691701
PA37308241715476565.946645691735
PA82102764638750166.51581065900
Average number of accessory genes = 1552
Eye/AustraliaPA17New60636071066.45582572915
PA40New109628460666.44570069790
PA149New59631482566.46574568835
PA15738656624962266.53570868798
PA17147160633934266.49581269902
PA17530962675764166.26181681271
Average number of accessory genes = 919
CF/AustraliaPA5554977623555466.57566867758
PA57New73633311766.48579268882
PA59New78628988766.55576768857
PA6477587626442866.55571365803
PA66New93633731066.51582868918
PA86New76617089366.46568568775
PA9277581614457366.59558465674
PA10048383631061666.5573266822
PA102171762624547466.55571069800
Average number of accessory genes = 810
PAO1*5491626440466.6567173761

#Sequence types were determined by the multi locus sequence typing database. The sequence types not listed in the MLST database have been deemed as new.

##Accessory genes were determined by subtracting number of core genes (4910) from total number of CDS. †Same MLST allelic profile. *Reference strain.

General features of the genomes of P. aeruginosa strains. #Sequence types were determined by the multi locus sequence typing database. The sequence types not listed in the MLST database have been deemed as new. ##Accessory genes were determined by subtracting number of core genes (4910) from total number of CDS. †Same MLST allelic profile. *Reference strain. A total of 9786 orthologs were detected in all 22 strains and the reference strain PAO1. As the pan-genome represents the cumulative genetic information within a set of bacterial genomes, its size increases with the number and diversity of strains used for evaluation. A study that included 17 P. aeruginosa reference strains from diverse sources has found 9344 orthologs in the pangenome[29], which is comparable to the results observed here. The higher number of genes in the pan-genome in our study may be the result of the diverse nature of the studied strains. Out of the 9786 pan genes, 4910 genes were common in at least 99% of strains and this represents the core genome for the strains in the current study. Prior studies have reported core genomes of 5316[30], 5233[29], 5021[31], and 4934[14] in different P. aeruginosa strains. Although the other studies used smaller sets (5 to 17) of genomes, the results are broadly comparable. Many factors may be responsible for the smaller core genomes in the current study including a larger population of genomes used for alignment, use of incomplete draft genomes, the diverse nature of the study populations (ocular and lung; Australian and Indian) and a strict definition of the core genome (≥99% similarity in each strain). For example, pan-genome analysis of the same set of genomes of the current study but excluding PA57 and using ≥95% similarity resulted in 5287 core genes. In addition to the large core genome, P. aeruginosa has accessory genomes that are not common in all strains[15]. The accessory genome can comprise of up to 20% of the total genome, and the majority of genes in this accessory genome are acquired horizontally. These genes include phages, transposons, IS and GI[14]. In the current study, the accessory genes were identified by subtracting the core genes (4910) from the total number of CDS. The frequency of accessory genes was 12% to 26%, which is more than the previously reported size of accessory genome[29,32]. However, the use of draft genomes may overestimate the number of accessory genes because of the presence of genomic repeats or transposable elements that may interrupt assembly and give an apparently larger genome than this actually present[33]. Accessory genomes may carry genes that help strains to persist in environments that may be unsuitable for others[30]. Like many other bacteria, the accessory genomes of P. aeruginosa encompasses genes related to virulence and antibiotic resistance[34,35]. The presence of a higher number of accessory genes in the set of ocular isolates indicates that eye strains may have acquired many genes to make this opportunistic species suitable to grow in the ocular environment. Furthermore, we examined the number of unique genes amongst accessory genes and found that the functions of the majority of the unique genes are unknown (Fig. 1a).
Figure 1

Composition of accessory genomes. (a) Distribution of unique genes. (b) Distribution of predicted no of insertion sequences (IS), genomic islands (GI) and phages.

Composition of accessory genomes. (a) Distribution of unique genes. (b) Distribution of predicted no of insertion sequences (IS), genomic islands (GI) and phages. The genomes were examined for the presence of insertion sequences (IS), genomic islands (GI) and prophages, which are the main elements of an accessory genome[15]. Contigs of draft genomes were reordered with reference to PAO1 and the ordered contigs were joined together and made into a single FASTA file before examining databases. The results show that the average predicated number of GI was 26 (range 29–18) in Indian eye isolates, which was greater than that of Australian isolates (average 13) irrespective of source. Similarly, the average predicted number of IS and phages were higher in Indian eye isolates (Fig. 1b). Twenty (PA157) to 75 (PA33) total accessory elements were observed in all draft genomes. In contrast, a study has noted 38 to 53 accessory elements that are integrated into 89 potential genomic loci (region of genomic plasticity) in the complete genome of several P. aeruginosa strains[14]. Complete genomes are required to ascertain the actual number of genes in accessory genome. Nevertheless, the predicted number of IS, GI and phages was well correlated with the size of the accessory genome indicating that they contribute to the genomic diversity as highlighted in other studies[15,35,36]. From the pangenome and MLST analysis (below), five Indian strains, isolated from different patients with different histories, were found to be clonal and showed at least 99.98% sequence similarity with each other in MUMmer3[37] whole genome alignment. To avoid the overestimation of the accessory genome due to the dominance of a single clone, we obtained the nucleotide sequence of five additional Indian eye isolates from public databases[22-24] and reran the pan genome analysis. The relative size of the accessory genome to PAO1 was examined (Supplementary Fig. S1). The results tend to show that the eye isolates have larger accessory genome than CF isolates. However, due to limited number of clonally diverse strains of Indian origin, further research on larger datasets is required to confirm this. Based upon MLST analysis, 16 distinct sequence types (STs) were found, with seven of these constituting new types. The ST was assigned to each strain according to the matched number in the MLST database[38]. Any strain that did not match with the existing database was deemed to have a new ST. Five Indian ocular isolates (out of seven) belonged to ST 308, two Australian CF isolates corresponded to ST 775 and three Australian CF strains had identical allelic profiles but did not match with any existing ST in the MLST database (all MLST profiles are shown in Supplementary Table S4). The remaining 13 STs were unique, with only a single representative (Table 1). Our results show that these strains belong to a diverse range of STs and are not similar to previously described clinical epidemic isolates[39,40]. Five strains with ST 308, collected from keratitis patients from the same centre in India, indicate the strains were potentially acquired from the same source where these strains may persist. The most common genotype observed in this study, ST 308, was also reported in MDR hospital strains in France[39]. Although the MLST database does not contain all P. aeruginosa strains, our observations show the diverse nature of the strains, which were not related to so-called world epidemic STs (ST 235, ST 111, ST 175, ST 395)[39]. This result also contradicts the previous finding that some keratitis isolates were clonally related with ST 235 CF strains[41].

Phylogenetics

A total of 82 complete genomes of P. aeruginosa including PAO1 were downloaded from the NCBI database and used to compare the phylogenetic diversity of 22 strains from the current study. These 82 strains were listed in PGDB[28] as a complete genome and could represent a global P. aeruginosa collection. Core genome alignment was generated using Parsnp of the Harvest Suite with PAO1 as the reference. The alignment was then used to construct a tree following previously described methods, with P. aeruginosa PA7, a taxonomic outliner[27], as an outgroup. A multi-sample variant call file was generated from the core genome alignment and SNPs present in all strains were examined (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). In total 284,252 SNP sites were identified amongst 104 isolates. All strains, except PA57, were clustered into two groups (Fig. 2). This is in agreement with several studies which have also shown that P. aeruginosa strains from various sources tend to cluster into two major groups[42-44], with group 1 being larger, and which contains the most widely studied stains PAO1[1] and some notable CF strains such as DK2 and LESB58[45,46]. Group 2 tends to be smaller and includes the well known virulent strain PA14[13] and an Indian ocular isolate VRFPA04, a virulent MDR strain[24]. All seven Indian and one Australian eye isolates were clustered into three sub-lineages within the group 2. A typing-based population structure analysis has also unveiled that keratitis P. aeruginosa strains are closely related[25]. Furthermore, this supports the finding of the previous study that human P. aeruginosa are less diverse than isolates from the environment[47]. Similarly, all the CF strains and five Australian eye strains were of group 1 (See Supplementary Table S1 for phylogeny group classification of each strains and associated core genome SNPs). Amongst the CF isolates, continuous mutations have been shown to be an evolutionary process that may make a strain more pathogenic so that they rapidly transfer between humans[16,21]. However, previous studies have not focussed on ocular isolates. Our analysis showed that more than 60% of eye isolates clustered together in a single group, which is in aggrement with previous findings that 71% of MK isolates of P. aeruginosa from the UK clustered together in the same group[48]. Further studies should focus on the evolutionary changes in ocular isolates of P. aeruginosa over a prescribed period of time. A CF strain PA57 was in a separate cluster and did not show similarity with other strains. This strain could be another taxonomic outlier of the P. aeruginosa (group 3)[44].
Figure 2

Phylogenetic analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree built with core genome SNPs based on mapping to the PAO1 excluding SNPs identified in regions that had arisen by recombination. (a) The original tree where the scale bars represent the number of substitutions per site. (b) Magnified tree showing branches and groups. Strains used in this study are indicated by distinct colour circles. Relative positions of few reference strains are shown, which are P. aeruginosa VRFPA04, P. aeruginosa UCBPP-PA14, P. aeruginosa PAO1, and P. aeruginosa DK2.

Phylogenetic analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree built with core genome SNPs based on mapping to the PAO1 excluding SNPs identified in regions that had arisen by recombination. (a) The original tree where the scale bars represent the number of substitutions per site. (b) Magnified tree showing branches and groups. Strains used in this study are indicated by distinct colour circles. Relative positions of few reference strains are shown, which are P. aeruginosa VRFPA04, P. aeruginosa UCBPP-PA14, P. aeruginosa PAO1, and P. aeruginosa DK2.

Antibiotic resistance gene profiles

Horizontally acquired resistance genes were examined using the assembled contigs in the ResFinder database. Altogether, 13 distinct types of acquired resistance genes were detected in this study (Fig. 3). In common with other P. aeruginosa strains[24], two beta-lactams (blaOXA-50, blaPAO) and one each for aminoglycoside (aph(3′)-IIb) fosfomycin (fosA) and chloramphenicol (catB7) resistance genes were present in all studied strains. Furthermore, six out of 22 strains had acquired additional resistance genes. Interestingly, all six strains were Indian eye isolates and possessed two aminoglycoside resistance genes (aph(3″)-Ib and aph(6)-Id), one sulphonamide resistance gene (sul1) and one quaternary ammonium compound resistance gene (qacEdelta1). The tetracycline efflux protein transporter gene tet(G) was detected in five Indian eye isolates, all of them are ST 308. An Indian eye strain PA34 possessed four unique resistance genes; blaNPS-1, aac(3)-IIb, dfrA15 and cmlA1 that can confer resistance to beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, trimethoprims and chloramphenicols, respectively. As horizontally acquired resistance genes may be associated with integrons, we analysed all of the draft sequences for the presence of integrons using Integron Finder version 1.5.1[49]. Although sul1 and qacEdelta1 are indicative of class I integrons, only strain PA34 possessed a class 1 integron, in agreement with a recent publication[50]. The acquired resistance genes detected were comparable to previous observations for an Indian eye isolate of P. aeruginosa[24]. As all Indian isolates of the current study were from the same centre in India, it is possible that there was antibiotic selection pressure that led to the selection for strains that had acquired such resistance genes from the environment. The absence of such genes in Australian isolates indicates that the antibiotic selection pressure may be different between Australia and India or that the genes associated with resistance are not readily accessible to P. aeruginosa in their local Australian environment. Furthermore, isolates from India were more likely to carry more resistance genes than Australian isolates, potentially reflecting the relatively unregulated use of antibiotics in India compared to Australia[51]. Antibiotic susceptivity tests also shows that Indian eye isolates were resistance to gentamicin and at least one fluoroquinolone. Resistance to aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone is however, low in Australian isolates (Table 2).
Figure 3

The presence and absence of resistance genes as detected by Resfinder database. Associated resistance: Beta lactams: - blaOXA-50, blaPAO,, blaNPS-1 Aminoglycosides: - aph(3′)-IIb, aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, aac(3)-IId Fosfomycin: fosA Sulphonamide: sul1 Chroramphenicol: cmlA1, catB7 Tetracycline: tet(G). Quaternary ammonium compounds: qacEdelta1.

Table 2

Antibiotic susceptibility profile of P. aeruginosa strains.

StrainsAntibiotics
GentamicinCiprofloxacinLevofloxacinMoxifloxacinCeftazimidinCefepimeImipenemTicarcillinAztronamPolymyxin B
Eye/IndiaPA31 R R R R IIIIII
PA32 R R R R ISIISI
PA33 R R R R IIIISS
PA34 R IS R SI R IIS
PA35 R R R R IIIISS
PA37 R R R R ISIISS
PA82I R IS R R SIS R
Eye/AustraliaPA17SIS R SSSIII
PA40S R SSSSIISS
PA149SSSSISSSSS
PA157SSSSISSISS
PA171SSSSISIISS
PA175SISSISIISS
CF/AustraliaPA55 R SSSSSIISS
PA57 R SSSSSSISS
PA59 R SSSSSSISS
PA64I R R R S R SISS
PA66 R II R S R SISS
PA86SSSSISSISS
PA92III R I R SSIS
PA100IIS R ISSSSS
PA102 R II R ISSSSS
The presence and absence of resistance genes as detected by Resfinder database. Associated resistance: Beta lactams: - blaOXA-50, blaPAO,, blaNPS-1 Aminoglycosides: - aph(3′)-IIb, aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, aac(3)-IId Fosfomycin: fosA Sulphonamide: sul1 Chroramphenicol: cmlA1, catB7 Tetracycline: tet(G). Quaternary ammonium compounds: qacEdelta1. Antibiotic susceptibility profile of P. aeruginosa strains. On the basis of searches in the literature and online databases (Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD), https://card.mcmaster.ca/home and the Pseudomonas genome database, http://www.pseudomonas.com), a set of 73 genes, which were related to antibiotic and disinfectant resistance in P. aeruginosa, were selected to examine variations in these genes between strains. Only high-quality, non-synonymous SNPs and indels were used for interpretation (Table 3). No insertions or deletions were detected in any of the strains. In terms of the number of SNPs and strains types, all Indian eye isolates and one Australian eye isolate (PA175) had relatively more variations (total SNPs >125) in the set of resistance genes than other strains. However, the CF strain PA57 had an exceptionally high number of SNPs in its resistome. Another CF strain, PA55, did not show any variations in its resistome. In terms of the total SNPs in resistance genes, the least number of variations (≤5 SNPs) were found in five efflux pump-related genes (oprM (5) cycB(1) mexF (4) nalD(5) and nfxB (2)), three target alternation genes (gyrB (5) tufA(2) tufB (0)) and one inactivation gene fosA (3); these are highly conserved genes in P. aeruginosa.
Table 3

Non-synonymous SNPs detected in the 73 genes related to antibiotic resistance in the 22 isolates studied using PAO1 as the reference genome.

Gene locusGene nameMechanismP. aeruginosa strains/number of SNPs
PA31PA32PA33PA34PA35PA37PA82PA17PA40PA149PA157PA171PA175PA55PA57PA59PA64PA66PA86PA92PA100PA102Total SNPs
PA0156 triA Antibiotic efflux45516541131137
PA0157 triB 111211111111114
PA0158 triC 2221221113118
PA0424 mexR 21121111212
PA0425 mexA 11111117
PA0426 mexB 1121421113
PA0427 oprM 111115
PA1236 farB 1111111111111
PA1282 lrfA 669468685564473433434108
PA1316 lrfA 22212233213233222222447
PA1435 mexM 444544346566585555545102
PA1436 mdtC 222122232322222222441
PA1754 cysB 11
PA2018 mexY 55555531114133111111255
PA2019 mexX 44444453453336343343480
PA2389 macA 2111111111111111118
PA2390 macB 11131121323113121121335
PA2391 opmQ 65646641321245454453181
PA2491 mexS 22212221111114222211134
PA2493 mexE 111321211114
PA2494 mexF 1124
PA2495 oprN 111211111121115
PA2525 adeC 35112223120
PA2526 muxC 1111116
PA2527 muxB 1214
PA2837 opmA 333433511346212211250
PA3019 taeA 11131111122224111113132
PA3137 farB 111111122222111111124
PA3521 opmE 333233235642311353353277
PA3522 mexQ 44444464522333464452380
PA3523 mexP 2221222322123332236
PA3574 nalD 1135
PA3676 mexK 1112115122236424422248
PA3677 mexJ 222222212333333136
PA3678 mexL 1111111111122122121
PA3894 adeC 11111221221116
PA4205 mexG 11111139
PA4206 mexH 111211119
PA4207 mexI 111111111111111116
PA4208 opmD 333333251146138
PA4374 mexV 2224223211224121121340
PA4375 mexW 222122331231121111132
PA4595 yjjk 11212131211117
PA4597 oprJ 2222933533337
PA4598 mexD 22222223221329212212349
PA4599 mexC 78838864141591114483
PA4600 nfxB 112
PA4974 opmH 211155121515113439
PA4990 emrE 111121119
PA4997 msbA 23322344311129
PA5158 adeC 33333322123533332148
PA5160 farB 4332435333333334334365
PA5518 rosB 333233311111111129
PA0706 catB7 Antibiotic inactivation44454433222341242243365
PA1129 fosA 123
PA4109 ampR 222322122321
PA4110 ampC 555355612222512111112269
PA4119Aph(3′)-IIb2223222111143111231
PA5514 OXA-50 1213252323341313443
PA0004 gyrB Antibiotic target alternation1315
PA0903 alaS 11111111111213
PA1972 pmrC 33333311141123232234149
PA3002 mfd 1223221112121211227
PA3168 gyrA 11111221111
PA3946 rosC 688376111122121122156
PA4265 tufA 112
PA4277 tufB 0
PA4560 ileS 22222221421124242243147
PA4964 parC 2222211113
PA4967 parE 111111211111112118
PA3553 pmrF 311117
PA3554 arnA 244544323346223455
PA0920 mprF 6664669211278212212276
Total SNPs137140144124146150136828979837712502178810988811018786
Non-synonymous SNPs detected in the 73 genes related to antibiotic resistance in the 22 isolates studied using PAO1 as the reference genome.

Virulence genes

Virulence factors associated with keratitis and cystic fibrosis were selected based on the literature and published sequences in the Virulence Factor Data Base (VFDB)[52] to examine the presence or absence of genes related to pathogenicity in the strains. A dataset of 147 virulence genes of PAO1 associated with adherence, protease production, the type IV secretion system, quorum sensing, alginate production/regulation and toxins were curated from VFDB and used in BLAST searches (Fig. 4). For the exoU gene, PA14 was taken as the reference because it is not present in PAO1. All instances where there was an absence of a gene were manually examined with orthologs from the most widely studied strains recommended by the PGDB[28]. Out of 147 genes, variation in virulence genes were found for 20 genes. This was most evident for a set of effector proteins (toxins) related to the type III secretion system (exoS, exoT, exoU and exoY)[53,54]. As in previous studies, exoS was predominantly found in CF strains (present in eight out of nine strains) and exoU was primarily found in eye strains (present in eight out of 13 eye isolates)[25,55-58]. Furthermore, as determined by previous studies, exoU and exoS were mutually exclusive[59]. However, neither exoU nor exoS was detected in the CF strain PA57. As the exoU gene is carried by genomic islands[53,60], exoU possessing strains showed larger accessory genomes and cluster together in the same phylogenetic group. The exoT (100%) and exoY (86%) genes were the most prevalent secretory toxins in the strains and this result is in agreement with previous findings[61]. In a recent study, exoY (55%) and exoT (5%) were less prevalent than in the current study although the reason for these differences in distribution remains unclear[62]. One possible reason for this difference is that the study examined genes on the basis of PCR products, which may not be able to capture all different orthologs of genes.
Figure 4

A circular representation of the genomes of studied isolates. The draft genomes of 22 strains were aligned against the 147 virulence genes curated from VFDB. Each genome is represented by a ring with different colours, which are shown in figure. Image was generated using BRIG (http://brig.sourceforge.net).

A circular representation of the genomes of studied isolates. The draft genomes of 22 strains were aligned against the 147 virulence genes curated from VFDB. Each genome is represented by a ring with different colours, which are shown in figure. Image was generated using BRIG (http://brig.sourceforge.net). Flagellar genes help in the establishment of infections as they can be involved in adherence to surfaces and were also widely variable between strains[63]. Seven flagellar genes (flgK, flgL, fliC, flaG, fliD, fliS, and fliT) clustered between PA1086 and PA1096 in PAO1 were not matched with those of 19 strains that included both eye and CF isolates. However, these genes from 19 strains showed 90% to 99% similarity with genes between PA7_4275 and PA7_4291 of PA7, orthologs of the above seven flagellar genes. There was low sequence similarity (<50%) for the above flagellar genes between PAO1 and PA7. Studies involving CF isolates have shown that the activity of the fliC gene (that encodes flagellin) had been either downregulated[64] or was absent in some strains[63]. As flagella are immunogenic, the loss of flagella may be an important antiphagocytic mechanism in chronic infection isolates[65]. Although it has been shown that non-flagellated strains are defective in acute infections[65], 85% of eye isolates in this study had altered flagellar genes that may affect flagellar function. Previous work has shown that although fliC contributes to invasion of P. aeruginosa in eye infections, a lack of fliC did not cause complete loss of invasion[66]. Further studies will need to clarify the functionality of those flagellar genes on studied strains and their role in ocular P. aeruginosa infections. A phospholipase D gene (pldA), a part of the type VI secretion system of P. aeruginosa is believed to promote chronic infections[67,68]. However, pldA was absent from 13 isolates, seven of which were CF isolates and yet over 50% eye isolates had pldA. Reports on the role of pldA in eye infections have not been published and this should be an area of future study. Another notable variation was observed in pvdE, a precursor for pyoverdin synthesis, which is essential for virulence of P. aeruginosa[69,70]. Eight strains, irrespective of their source of isolation, had a PAO1 homolog of pvdE. Similarly, DK2 and LES homologs of pvdE were equally distributed in 14 strains (Table 4) suggesting that these orthologs are evenly distributed in P. aeruginosa populations. PvdE can increase invasion of P. aeruginosa by inducing expression of the exoS[71]. Further studies will help understand role of pvdE variants in pathogenesis.
Table 4

Distribution of pvdE orthologs among strains.

StrainspvdE orthologs (locus tag)
PA31, PA32, PA33, PA34, PA35, PA37 and PA175P. aeruginosa DK2 (DK2_13280)
PA82, PA17, PA171, PA175, PA55, PA57, PA64, and PA92P. aeruginosa PAO1 (PA2397)
PA40, PA149, PA59, PA66, PA86, PA100 and PA102P. aeruginosa LESB58 (PALES_28991)
Distribution of pvdE orthologs among strains.

Conclusions

This study compared the genomic variations between Australian and Indian P. aeruginosa isolates from ocular infections. P. aeruginosa isolates from various sources showed diversity in the size of accessory genome, antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors. We found a slightly smaller core genome than has been reported previously. Although all 22 strains were distributed throughout the global phylogeny of P. aeruginosa, certain clusters were observed in the eye isolates where five Indian eye isolates were clustered into a single clonal lineage in the group which also contains a well-studied and virulent strain PA14. Larger accessory genomes were associated with eye isolates of this group. Furthermore, the strains of this group had more SNPs in their set of 73 resistome suggesting possible positive antibiotic selection pressure. Variation in virulence factors, except for exoU, was not correlated with phylogeny. This study relied on draft genomes and may not be able to predict actual genomic diversity because the analysis could not ascertain the presence of the plasmids in any of the isolates. Further studies will focus on improvement of the assembly of these genomes. Overall, these findings have extended our understanding of the genomic diversity of P. aeruginosa in two different infections and information can be used to elucidate various mechanism that would help fight against virulent and drug resistant strains.

Methods

Bacterial strains and antibiotic susceptibility tests

Twenty two clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa from corneas of microbial keratitis and from the lungs of CF patients were selected for this study. Seven ocular isolates were obtained from a tertiary eye care centre in India (L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India), six ocular and nine CF isolates were acquired from various sources in Australia. All strains were collected from institutional repositories between 1992 and 2007 without identifiable patient data and all experiments followed the institutional guidelines, which were in place at the time (Table 5). Genome sequence data of an additional 82 P. aeruginosa strains, based on availability of complete genome sequence in Pseudomonas genome database (PGDB) version 17.2[28] including P. aeruginosa PAO1 (reference strain) were collected from public databases and used in this study to compare results and to build phylogenetic trees (all the reference strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, ticarcillin, imipenem, gentamicin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and polymyxin were determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines and published standard breakpoints[72-74].
Table 5

List of strains used in this study.

StrainsCollection date#Geographical locationAssociated infections
PA3102/10/1997LVPEI, Hyderabad, IndiaMicrobial Keratitis
PA3208/10/1997LVPEI, Hyderabad, IndiaMicrobial Keratitis
PA3329/08/1997LVPEI, Hyderabad, IndiaMicrobial Keratitis
PA3428/08/1997LVPEI, Hyderabad, IndiaMicrobial Keratitis
PA3509/08/1997LVPEI, Hyderabad, IndiaMicrobial Keratitis
PA3711/07/1997LVPEI, Hyderabad, IndiaMicrobial Keratitis
PA8211/05/2004LVPEI, Hyderabad, IndiaMicrobial Keratitis
PA1715/09/1992Flinders, Adelaide, AustraliaMicrobial Keratitis
PA4002/02/1999SEH, Sydney, AustraliaMicrobial Keratitis
PA14904/03/2004Flinders, Adelaide, AustraliaMicrobial Keratitis
PA15729/04/2006PAH, Brisbane, AustraliaMicrobial Keratitis
PA17116/03/2006PAH, Brisbane, AustraliaMicrobial Keratitis
PA17507/10/2006PAH, Brisbane, AustraliaMicrobial Keratitis
PA552003RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis
PA572003RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis
PA592003RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis
PA642003RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis
PA662003RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis
PA862004RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis
PA922004RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis
PA1002004RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis
PA1022004RPAH, Sydney, AustraliaCystic Fibrosis

LVPEI = LV Prasad Eye Institute; Flinders = Flinders University, SEH = Sydney Eye Hospital; PAH = Princes Alexandra Hospital; RPAH = Royal Prince Alfred Hospital CF Clinic, Sydney, Australia.

#All cystic fibrosis isolates were obtained from Royal Prince Alfred Hospital CF Clinic, Sydney, Australia, between 2003 and 2004. Information on exact date of collection is missing in our record.

List of strains used in this study. LVPEI = LV Prasad Eye Institute; Flinders = Flinders University, SEH = Sydney Eye Hospital; PAH = Princes Alexandra Hospital; RPAH = Royal Prince Alfred Hospital CF Clinic, Sydney, Australia. #All cystic fibrosis isolates were obtained from Royal Prince Alfred Hospital CF Clinic, Sydney, Australia, between 2003 and 2004. Information on exact date of collection is missing in our record.

Whole genome sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from overnight cultures using the DNeasy® Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN®, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The paired-end library was prepared using Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina®, San Diego, CA, USA). Libraries were then sequenced on Illumina® MiSeq bench top sequencer (Illumina), generating 300 bp paired-end reads. All of the libraries were multiplexed on one MiSeq run.

Genome assembly and sequence analysis

The MiSeq sequencing resulted an average of 760,773 reads (range 632,180 to 1,193,844) per isolate. FastQC version 0.11.7 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) was used to assess the quality of raw reads, which were then quality trimmed to remove adaptor sequences using Trimmomatic version 0.36 and with the setting of minimum read length of 36 and minimum coverage of 15[75]. A de novo assembly was performed by SPAdes version 3.11.1[76]. with the default setting. The annotations of the assembled genomes were performed using Prokka version 1.7. using GenBank® compliance flag[77]. The genome of P. aeruginosa PAO1 (RefSeq accession number NC_002516.2), which was used as the reference in this study, was re-annotated with Prokka to avoid annotation bias. Whenever necessary, the contigs of the draft genomes were reordered and/or aligned with the reference genome using MAUVE multiple-genome alignment software[78,79]. Artemis, a genome browser tool[80], was used to concatenate the ordered contigs to get a single fragment of genomes which were used to examine insertion sequence using web tool ISsaga (http://issaga.biotoul.fr/ISsaga2/issaga_index.php), genomic islands using IslandViewer 4[81] and prophages using PHASTER[82] Multi locus sequence type (MLST) was determined using pubMLST database[38] to find sequence type (ST) of each strain.

Pan-genome and Phylogenetics

The pangenome analysis was performed using Roary version 3.12.0[83] which uses the GFF3 files produced by Prokka. The program was run using the default settings, which uses BLASTp for all-against-all comparison with a percentage sequence identity of 95%. Core-genes were taken as the genes which were common in at least 99% of strains. The accessory genome was obtained as the genes present in the genome of each strain minus core genes. The Roary “gene_presence_absence.csv” file was further examined for unique genes using “union” and “difference” command. Parsnp version 1.2 in the Harvest Suite[84] was used to align the genomes of 104 P. aeruginosa strains (82 complete genomes from the PGDB and 22 draft genomes from this study), followed by the construction of a maximum likelihood tree based on core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), excluding SNPs identified in regions that had arisen by recombination.

Variant calling

The paired-end reads for each isolate were aligned against the genome of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 using Bowtie2 version 2.3.2[85] following “score-min” command to avoid alignments that score less than the default minimum score threshold and with “local” flag for better score. Genomic variants were compiled using “mpileup” in SAMtools, version 1.7[86]. A minimum quality score of 50 was set to list the SNPs and Indels. The genomic variants were annotated using SnpEff version 4.3[87] with the default options to obtain the nucleotide changes and the predicted effects at the protein level.

Antibiotic resistance and virulence genes

Genomes were examined for the presence of acquired resistance genes using Resfinder 3.0 (Centre for Genomic Epidemiology, DTU, Denmark)[88]. Furthermore, a set of 73 genes related to antibiotic and disinfectant resistance in P. aeruginosa were selected from searches in the online databases Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) (https://card.mcmaster.ca/home)[89] and Pseudomonas genome database (http://www.pseudomonas.com)[28]. These 73 genes were manually examined for the presence of non-synonymous SNPs to predict genotypic changes in the resistome (see Supplementary Table S3). A dataset of 146 virulence genes of PAO1 and one virulence gene (exoU) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa UCBPP-PA14 (NC_008463.1) associated with adherence (flagella), protease production, type IV secretion system, quorum sensing, alginate production/regulation and toxins were curated from the Virulence Factor Data Base (VFDB)[90] and used in BLAST searches to match them with the genomes of the strains studied here. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG)[91] was used to generate an image that shows presence or absence of virulence genes in multiple genomes. (List of virulence genes used is shown in Supplementary Table S4). The contigs were joined together before searching them in BRIG to avoid false matching due to fragmented genomes. The absence of a gene in this analysis was confirmed by manual BLASTn searching using orthologs from a widely-studied panel of P. aeruginosa suggested by PGDB. These include PA14, P. aeruginosa LESB58 (NC_011770.1), P. aeruginosa PA7 (NC_009656.1) and P. aeruginosa DK2 (CP003149.1).

Nucleotide accession

The nucleotide sequences are available in the GenBank under the Bioproject accession number PRJNA431326.
  86 in total

Review 1.  Contact lens-related microbial keratitis: how have epidemiology and genetics helped us with pathogenesis and prophylaxis.

Authors:  F Stapleton; N Carnt
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  FlhA, a component of the flagellum assembly apparatus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, plays a role in internalization by corneal epithelial cells.

Authors:  S M Fleiszig; S K Arora; R Van; R Ramphal
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses.

Authors:  Shaan L Gellatly; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in a burn center.

Authors:  Keila de Cássia Ferreira de Almeida Silva; Mariana Alcântara Calomino; Gabriela Deutsch; Selma Rodrigues de Castilho; Geraldo Renato de Paula; Luciana Maria Ramires Esper; Lenise Arneiro Teixeira
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Unraveling genomic and phenotypic nature of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa VRFPA04 isolated from keratitis patient.

Authors:  Murugan N; Malathi J; Umashankar V; Madhavan H N
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.415

6.  Increased prevalence and clonal dissemination of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa with the blaIMP-1 gene cassette in Hiroshima.

Authors:  Syuntaro Kouda; Masaru Ohara; Makoto Onodera; Yoshihiro Fujiue; Megumi Sasaki; Tadahiro Kohara; Seiya Kashiyama; Shizue Hayashida; Toshie Harino; Takahiro Tsuji; Hideyuki Itaha; Naomasa Gotoh; Akio Matsubara; Tsuguru Usui; Motoyuki Sugai
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Comparative genome mapping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO with P. aeruginosa C, which belongs to a major clone in cystic fibrosis patients and aquatic habitats.

Authors:  K D Schmidt; B Tümmler; U Römling
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Page; Carla A Cummins; Martin Hunt; Vanessa K Wong; Sandra Reuter; Matthew T G Holden; Maria Fookes; Daniel Falush; Jacqueline A Keane; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Virulence and resistance features of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from chronic leg ulcers.

Authors:  Mihaela Georgescu; Irina Gheorghe; Carmen Curutiu; Veronica Lazar; Coralia Bleotu; Mariana-Carmen Chifiriuc
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Efflux pump regulatory genes mutations in multidrug resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from wound infections in Isfahan hospitals.

Authors:  Hamid Vaez; Jamshid Faghri; Bahram Nasr Isfahani; Sharareh Moghim; Sima Yadegari; Hossein Fazeli; Mohsen Moghofeei; Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-05-28
View more
  18 in total

1.  One Day in Denmark: Comparison of Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Bacterial Isolates From Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Ana Rita Rebelo; Valeria Bortolaia; Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon; Dennis Schrøder Hansen; Hans Linde Nielsen; Svend Ellermann-Eriksen; Michael Kemp; Bent Løwe Røder; Niels Frimodt-Møller; Turid Snekloth Søndergaard; John Eugenio Coia; Claus Østergaard; Henrik Westh; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Genomic Surveillance of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Reveals an Additive Effect of Carbapenemase Production on Carbapenem Resistance.

Authors:  Luke Diorio-Toth; Sidra Irum; Robert F Potter; Meghan A Wallace; Muhammad Arslan; Tehmina Munir; Saadia Andleeb; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pangenome: Core and Accessory Genes of a Highly Resourceful Opportunistic Pathogen.

Authors:  Kaleb Z Abram; Se-Ran Jun; Zulema Udaondo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  Intraspecies heterogeneity in microbial interactions.

Authors:  Dallas L Mould; Deborah A Hogan
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 7.584

5.  Accessory genome of the multi-drug resistant ocular isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA34.

Authors:  Dinesh Subedi; Gurjeet Singh Kohli; Ajay Kumar Vijay; Mark Willcox; Scott A Rice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Carbon steel corrosion by bacteria from failed seal rings at an offshore facility.

Authors:  Silvia J Salgar-Chaparro; Adam Darwin; Anna H Kaksonen; Laura L Machuca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA80 is a cystic fibrosis isolate deficient in RhlRI quorum sensing.

Authors:  Syed A K Shifat Ahmed; Michelle Rudden; Sabrina M Elias; Thomas J Smyth; Roger Marchant; Ibrahim M Banat; James S G Dooley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamase genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients in rural Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Mojisola C Hosu; Sandeep D Vasaikar; Grace E Okuthe; Teke Apalata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparative genome analysis of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa JNQH-PA57, a clinically isolated mucoid strain with comprehensive carbapenem resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  Mingju Hao; Wanshan Ma; Xiutao Dong; Xiaofeng Li; Fang Cheng; Yujiao Wang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Antibiotic Resistance Characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Keratitis in Australia and India.

Authors:  Mahjabeen Khan; Fiona Stapleton; Stephen Summers; Scott A Rice; Mark D P Willcox
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.