Literature DB >> 21808635

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Genomic Structure and Diversity.

Jens Klockgether1, Nina Cramer, Lutz Wiehlmann, Colin F Davenport, Burkhard Tümmler.   

Abstract

The Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome (G + C content 65-67%, size 5.5-7 Mbp) is made up of a single circular chromosome and a variable number of plasmids. Sequencing of complete genomes or blocks of the accessory genome has revealed that the genome encodes a large repertoire of transporters, transcriptional regulators, and two-component regulatory systems which reflects its metabolic diversity to utilize a broad range of nutrients. The conserved core component of the genome is largely collinear among P. aeruginosa strains and exhibits an interclonal sequence diversity of 0.5-0.7%. Only a few loci of the core genome are subject to diversifying selection. Genome diversity is mainly caused by accessory DNA elements located in 79 regions of genome plasticity that are scattered around the genome and show an anomalous usage of mono- to tetradecanucleotides. Genomic islands of the pKLC102/PAGI-2 family that integrate into tRNA(Lys) or tRNA(Gly) genes represent hotspots of inter- and intraclonal genomic diversity. The individual islands differ in their repertoire of metabolic genes that make a large contribution to the pangenome. In order to unravel intraclonal diversity of P. aeruginosa, the genomes of two members of the PA14 clonal complex from diverse habitats and geographic origin were compared. The genome sequences differed by less than 0.01% from each other. One hundred ninety-eight of the 231 single nucleotide substitutions (SNPs) were non-randomly distributed in the genome. Non-synonymous SNPs were mainly found in an integrated Pf1-like phage and in genes involved in transcriptional regulation, membrane and extracellular constituents, transport, and secretion. In summary, P. aeruginosa is endowed with a highly conserved core genome of low sequence diversity and a highly variable accessory genome that communicates with other pseudomonads and genera via horizontal gene transfer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pseudomonas aeruginosa; accessory genome; clonal complex; core genome; genome; genomic island; oligonucleotide signature

Year:  2011        PMID: 21808635      PMCID: PMC3139241          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

The genetic repertoire of Pseudomonas aeruginosa reflects the lifestyle of this ubiquitous bacterial species. P. aeruginosa strains are found in various environmental habitats as well as in animal and human hosts, where they can act as opportunistic pathogens. The colonization of this broad spectrum of habitats goes along with the ability to exploit many different nutrition sources and a high potential for adaptation to new (or changing) environmental conditions (Ramos, 2004). The metabolic versatility is provided by genes encoding not only the enzymes participating in metabolic pathways, but also by a very high number of transcriptional regulators and two-component regulatory systems. More than 500 regulatory genes were identified in the genome of strain PAO1 (Stover et al., 2000). The genomes of P. aeruginosa strains are larger than those of most sequenced bacteria. Within the species, the genome size varies between 5.5 and 7 Mbp (Schmidt et al., 1996; Lee et al., 2006). The divergence in genome size is caused by the so-called accessory genome. The major part of the genome, the core genome, is found in all P. aeruginosa strains with the respective DNA generally collinearly arranged (Römling et al., 1995). The core genome, with few exceptions of loci subject to diversifying selection, is highly conserved among clonal complexes and shows sequence diversities of 0.5–0.7% (Spencer et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2006; Cramer et al., 2011). The accessory genome consists of extrachromosomal elements like plasmids and of blocks of DNA inserted into the chromosome at various loci. The elements of the accessory genome can be present in subgroups of the P. aeruginosa population but may also occur only in single strains (Klockgether et al., 2007; Wiehlmann et al., 2007). The individual composition of the accessory genome accounts for most intra- and interclonal genome diversity in P. aeruginosa. The elements of the accessory genome were apparently acquired by horizontal gene transfer from different sources including other species or genera. Upon integration into the host chromosome they appear as “foreign” blocks in the core genome. Therefore, a P. aeruginosa chromosome is often described as a mosaic structure of conserved core genome frequently interrupted by the inserted parts of the accessory genome. The individual mosaics also show remarkable plasticity. Ongoing acquisition of new foreign DNA as well as larger or smaller deletion events, mutations of single nucleotides and even chromosomal inversions (Römling et al., 1997; Ernst et al., 2003; Kresse et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2006; Klockgether et al., 2010; Cramer et al., 2011) – all of them potentially affecting parts of the core and/or the accessory genome – continuously modify the genome, modulate the P. aeruginosa strain’s phenotype and differentiate it from others. Genome diversity of P. aeruginosa was initially analyzed by low-resolution physical mapping techniques (Schmidt et al., 1996; Römling et al., 1997). Thanks to progress in DNA sequencing technologies P. aeruginosa genomes can nowadays be compared by the base (Kung et al., 2010; Silby et al., 2011).

Genome Sequences

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is ubiquitous in aquatic habitats and colonizes animate surfaces of humans, animals and plants. Complete genome sequences, however, are so far only available for P. aeruginosa isolates from human infections (Table 1).
Table 1

Features of sequenced .

StrainPAO1PA14PA7LESB58PACS22192C371939016
SourceWoundClinicalClinicalCF-patientClinicalCF-patientCF-patientKeratitis
Genome size (Mbp)6.2646.5386.5886.6026.4926.9056.2226.667
GC-content (%)66.666.366.566.56666.266.566
No. of protein coding ORFs55705892628659255676619155786401
Features of sequenced . The first complete genome sequencing was performed for strain PAO1 (Stover et al., 2000), derived from an Australian wound isolate from the 1950s. The PAO1 strain has been and is still the major reference for genetic and functional studies on P. aeruginosa. The PAO1 genome consists of a 6.264-Mbp circular chromosome encoding 5,570 predicted protein coding sequences. Sequence and annotation are deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome database (Refseq. no. NC_002516) and in the Pseudomonas Genome Database (Winsor et al., 2009), which also documents ongoing annotation updates. Thanks to the recently developed deep cDNA sequencing more and more non-coding RNAs are currently being identified in bacterial genomes, and thus we can expect a large number of non-coding genes to be added to the annotation of P. aeruginosa genomes as has been executed for Helicobacter pylori and Pseudomonas putida (Sharma et al., 2010; Frank et al., 2011). The second P. aeruginosa genome sequence was published for the ExoU-positive strain PA14 (NC_008463, Lee et al., 2006), a clinical isolate displaying higher virulence than PAO1. Fifty-four PAO1 regions of at least one open reading frames (ORFs) are absent in the PA14 genome, and 58 PA14 regions are absent in PAO1 including the PA14 pathogenicity islands PAPI-1 and PAPI-2 (He et al., 2004). LESB58, a so-called “Liverpool epidemic strain,” was found to be highly transmissible among CF-patients and displayed the potential to cause severe infections even in non-CF human hosts (Cheng et al., 1996; McCallum et al., 2002). The LESB58 genome (NC_011770) contains previously unknown accessory genome elements (Winstanley et al., 2009). PA7 is a clinical isolate from Argentina with a notably unusual antimicrobial resistance pattern. Strain PA7 (NC_009656) shares only 93.5% nucleotide identity in the core genome with the other sequenced strains confirming the previous assignment of strain PA7 as a taxonomic outlier within the species P. aeruginosa (Roy et al., 2010). Almost complete genome sequences are also available for strains 2192 (NZ_AAKW00000000), C3719 (NZ_AAKV00000000), PACS2 (NZ_AAQW00000000; Mathee et al., 2008), and 39016 (AEEX00000000; Stewart et al., 2011). Eight additional P. aeruginosa genome sequences are listed at NCBI as “In Progress” (last checked on February 23rd, 2011) and numerous P. aeruginosa projects are deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) hosted by EMBL-EBI. With decreasing costs and increasing speed of sequencing we can expect an avalanche of novel P. aeruginosa genome sequence data. Published examples are the comparative sequencing of PAO1 sublines of divergent metabolic and virulence phenotypes (Klockgether et al., 2010), the identification of de novo mutations conferring antimicrobial resistance (Moya et al., 2009), the analysis of genomic gradients of sequence diversity in a pool of clinical isolates (Dötsch et al., 2010), and the intraclonal microevolution in the cystic fibrosis lung (Cramer et al., 2011).

The Accessory Genome

The accessory genome consists of DNA elements from within the range of a few hundred bases to more than 200 kbp. The minimum size of an accessory element was defined as a block of at least four contiguous ORFs that are not conserved in all P. aeruginosa (Mathee et al., 2008). Thirty-eight to 53 accessory elements were identified in the completely sequenced P. aeruginosa genomes (Table 2). The PAO1 genome only contains inserts of 14 kbp or smaller (Mathee et al., 2008), whereas the LESB58 genome harbors five genomic islands and five inserted prophages of 14–111 kbp in size (Winstanley et al., 2009). Table 3 lists the subset of genomic islands that were analyzed in detail in silico and/or in wet lab experiments.
Table 2

Regions of genome plasticity (RGP) in seven sequenced .

RGPFlanking lociStrain
Insertion SiteIn PAO11In PA141PAO1PA14LESB58PA72192C3719PACS2
RGP10201/020802530/02550*i**
RGP2tRNAArg0256/026403160/03420*i*i**
RGP30611/062907960/08160**i2i++
RGP40641/064808300/08330*ii2i*ii
RGP5tRNAGly0714/073055100/54830iiiii
RGP6tmRNA0819/082753680/53560iiiiiii
RGP7tRNALys0976/098851670/51510iii
RGP8tRNASer1013/101451240/51220ii
RGP931087/109250340/50290***ii*i
RGP101191/119249040/48870iii
RGP111222/122548520/48440*i*i***
RGP121243/124448160/48150ii
RGP131367/137346630/46490iiiii
RGP141375/137646470/46540ii
RGP151377/139446440/46390iii4iii
RGP161530/153144650/44640i5ii
RGP17tRNAHis1796/179741350/41280ii
RGP191964/196539130/39110i
RGP202024/207038340/37730i**iii
RGP212099/210737360/37350**
RGP222181/218736370/36360**i**
RGP232217/223536050/35690iiiiiii
RGP242422/242333370/33290iii**
RGP252455/246432860/32770iiiiiii
RGP26tRNALeu2570/257131290/30840ii
RGP27tRNAGly2583/258430700/30670iiii
RGP28tRNAPro2727/273728895/28730iiiiiii
RGP29tRNAGly2817/282027710/27590+**+i**
RGP302950/295125900/25880i
RGP3163141/316023470/23360iiii*i*
RGP323222/322322560/22490i
RGP333239/324022290/22075i
RGP343496/351518870/18860i
RGP353536/353718620/18610i
RGP363768/376915670/15340iii
RGP373865/387013990/13850*i*
RGP384162/416310130/10040**
RGP394190/419609700/09690*****
RGP41tRNALys4541/454258900/60190iiii
RGP42tRNAMet4673/467461820/61840i7iii
RGP432770/277328280/28220*8i*8i*8*8*8
RGP444100/410810850/10820*i*****
RGP460041/004200510/00530iiiii
RGP471149/115349530/49500ii**i*
RGP481238/124248240/48170****
RGP501655/165643110/43050i
RGP521934/194039500/39460iiiiiii
RGP532332/233734450/34440*****
RGP562793/279528000/27980**+i+*+9
RGP58tRNAArg3366/336820560/20490*ii***i
RGP6010tRNAThr4524/452658700/58750i*+i+*i
RGP62tRNAPhe5149/515068000/68040i
RGP630069110081011i
RGP640278110362011i
RGP650377/037804940/04950i
RGP66tRNAMet0574/057507450/07500ii
RGP673858/385914080/14100i
RGP68123840/384414290/14340*i*i***
RGP693714/371516340/16350i
RGP70tRNAPro3031/303224860/24880i
RGP712650/265129820/29830*i**
RGP72tRNACys2581/258230710/30730i
RGP73132397/240333600/33690**i+i++
RGP742201/220236230/36250i
RGP751579/158044070/44080i
RGP761425/142845980/46010***i***
RGP771397/139846330/46350**
RGP784466/446757980/57990i
RGP795290/529169840/69850i
RGP805454/546072000/72060***i***
RGP814138/413910420/10380i
RGP823663/366416980/16970i
RGP833463/346419330/19320i14ii14*14*14
RGP84tRNASer2603/260430430/30410i15
RGP852593/259430550/30560i15
RGP860831/083253510/53520i
RGP87tRNAThr5160/516168140/68170ii
RGP883961161263016
RGP893834/383614440/14390*i*+i*+

Differentiation of accessory elements in the RGPs: i, strain-specific accessory element; *or +, identical accessory elements in two or more strains. RGPs 1–62 were defined by Mathee et al. (.

1Insertions are designated by the numbers of the flanking loci in the PAO1 and PA14 genomes (e.g., 0201 is PA0201, 02530 is PA14_02530).

2Insertion LESPP-1 between PA0612 and PA0648 homologs comprises RGP3 and RGP4.

3Region containing flagellin glycosylation genes (replacement island).

4Partial duplication of sequence of the core genome (between RGP27 and RGP28).

5No annotated ORF in this insertion.

6Region contains O-antigen gene cluster (replacement island).

7No insertion in PAO1 reference sequence but in variants PAO1-DSM and MPAO1 (Klockgether et al., .

8Identical sequence with discordant ORF annotation for the different strains.

9Identical sequence with discordant annotation for PACS2 versus LESB58 and 2192.

10Region contains .

11Homologous ORF in PA7 disrupted by the insertion.

12Insertion contains .

13Region contains pyoverdine synthesis gene cluster (replacement island).

14<1 kb insertion in PAO1, 2192, C3719, and PACS2 with no predicted ORF.

15Insertion in PA7 comprises RGP84 and RGP85.

16Homologous ORF in strain PSE9 disrupted by PAGI-7.

Table 3

Genomic islands in .

Genomic islandHost strainSize (kb)RGP locusReference
PAPI-1PA1410841He et al. (2004)
PAPI-2PA1410.87He et al. (2004)
LES-prophage 1LESB5814.83 and 4Winstanley et al. (2009)
LES-prophage 2LESB5842.181Winstanley et al. (2009)
LES-prophage 3LESB5842.882Winstanley et al. (2009)
LES-prophage 4LESB5826.883Winstanley et al. (2009)
LES-prophage 5LESB5839.984Winstanley et al. (2009)
LES-prophage 6LESB587.610Winstanley et al. (2009)
LESGI-1LESB5846.428Winstanley et al. (2009)
LESGI-2LESB5831.785Winstanley et al. (2009)
LESGI-3LESB58110.627Winstanley et al. (2009)
LESGI-4LESB5839.423Winstanley et al. (2009)
LESGI-5LESB5829.486Winstanley et al. (2009)
pKLC102C, SG17M103.541Klockgether et al. (2004)
PAGI-1X2450948.923Liang et al. (2001)
PAGI-2C10529Larbig et al. (2002)
PAGI-3SG17M103.329Larbig et al. (2002)
PAGI-4C23.47Klockgether et al. (2004)
PAGI-5PSE999.37Battle et al. (2008)
PAGI-6PSE944.487Battle et al. (2009)
PAGI-7PSE922.588Battle et al. (2009)
PAGI-8PSE916.262Battle et al. (2009)
PAGI-9PSE96.689Battle et al. (2009)
PAGI-10PSE92.225Battle et al. (2009)
PAGI-11PSE9252Battle et al. (2009)
ExoU-A607781.27Kulasekara et al. (2006)
ExoU-B1966029.87Kulasekara et al. (2006)
ExoU-CX132733.77Kulasekara et al. (2006)
Regions of genome plasticity (RGP) in seven sequenced . Differentiation of accessory elements in the RGPs: i, strain-specific accessory element; *or +, identical accessory elements in two or more strains. RGPs 1–62 were defined by Mathee et al. (. 1Insertions are designated by the numbers of the flanking loci in the PAO1 and PA14 genomes (e.g., 0201 is PA0201, 02530 is PA14_02530). 2Insertion LESPP-1 between PA0612 and PA0648 homologs comprises RGP3 and RGP4. 3Region containing flagellin glycosylation genes (replacement island). 4Partial duplication of sequence of the core genome (between RGP27 and RGP28). 5No annotated ORF in this insertion. 6Region contains O-antigen gene cluster (replacement island). 7No insertion in PAO1 reference sequence but in variants PAO1-DSM and MPAO1 (Klockgether et al., . 8Identical sequence with discordant ORF annotation for the different strains. 9Identical sequence with discordant annotation for PACS2 versus LESB58 and 2192. 10Region contains . 11Homologous ORF in PA7 disrupted by the insertion. 12Insertion contains . 13Region contains pyoverdine synthesis gene cluster (replacement island). 14<1 kb insertion in PAO1, 2192, C3719, and PACS2 with no predicted ORF. 15Insertion in PA7 comprises RGP84 and RGP85. 16Homologous ORF in strain PSE9 disrupted by PAGI-7. Genomic islands in . Within the chromosomally integrated islands, very often phages, transposons, or IS-elements are found indicating that the majority of the accessory genome originates from mobile DNA elements which have been acquired and kept by the host strain. Many elements were irreversibly fixed by secondary mutation or deletions, but a few others have retained their mobility and can still leave the chromosomal insertion site and be transferred elsewhere, as shown for the elements PAPI-1 (Qiu et al., 2006) and pKLC102 (Klockgether et al., 2007). For a detailed description of the different types of accessory elements [integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), prophages, transposons, etc.], the reader is referred to the recently published review by Kung et al. (2010). The acquisition of the elements of the accessory genome from other taxa is not only evident from the gene contents with its overrepresentation of mobile DNA elements, but also from global parameters like the oligonucleotide signature. The segments of the core genome share the same oligonucleotide usage, whereas the constituents of the accessory genome exhibit a divergent G + C content and oligonucleotide usage (Reva and Tümmler, 2004, 2005). In the genome atlas of P. aeruginosa LESB58 (Figure 1), the regions with an anomalous tetranucleotide composition and an underrepresentation of common octa- to tetradecanucleotides coincide with the segments of the accessory genome. Figure 2 shows the genome distribution of the most abundant 8- to 14mers in P. aeruginosa LESB58 (Davenport et al., 2009). Regions that lack these strain- or taxon-specific words represent those parts of the accessory genome that is most foreign from the core.
Figure 1

Genome atlas representations of G + C content, tetranucleotide parameters and overrepresented 8- to 14mers in . Increasing divergence from average (up to an extreme value at ±3 SD) is indicated by progressively darker colors. G + C content and the three tetranucleotide parameters are plotted on the innermost four rings. Distance (second innermost circle) is the distance between global and local sliding window tetranucleotide patterns, pattern skew (third innermost circle) is the distance between tetranucleotide rankings on direct and reverse strands, and oligonucleotide variance (fourth innermost circle) is the numerical variance of oligomers, where a lower value indicates tetramer usage is more highly restricted (for example in repeat regions). Rings 5 (χ2 threshold 3000) and 6 (χ2 threshold 7000) display the number of bases occupied by overrepresented 8- to 14mers in a certain region, with overlaps only counted once, as a percentage. The outermost ring shows the difference (in classes) between a tetranucleotide parameter, oligonucleotide variance, and the 8- to 14mers in ring 5. Figures were created with JCircleGraph. Letters at the outermost ring indicate the regions of the six identified prophages (a–f) and five genomic islands (g–k; Winstanley et al., 2009).

Figure 2

The most overrepresented 8- 14 bp oligomers in . The genome position of each oligo is plotted on the y-axis. A black dot is printed where an oligonucleotide occurs in non-coding regions and a green dot where an oligonucleotide occurs in coding regions. The figure was created with the program OligoViz (Davenport et al., 2009). The majority of the overrepresented 8–14 bp oligomers is located in coding sequences distributed all over the genome; only in the few cases of white vertical lines the respective oligonucleotide clusters in a few genome positions. Horizontal white lines indicate regions with an atypical oligonucleotide usage that lack these strain- or taxon-specific words and represent those parts of the accessory genome that are most foreign from the core.

Genome atlas representations of G + C content, tetranucleotide parameters and overrepresented 8- to 14mers in . Increasing divergence from average (up to an extreme value at ±3 SD) is indicated by progressively darker colors. G + C content and the three tetranucleotide parameters are plotted on the innermost four rings. Distance (second innermost circle) is the distance between global and local sliding window tetranucleotide patterns, pattern skew (third innermost circle) is the distance between tetranucleotide rankings on direct and reverse strands, and oligonucleotide variance (fourth innermost circle) is the numerical variance of oligomers, where a lower value indicates tetramer usage is more highly restricted (for example in repeat regions). Rings 5 (χ2 threshold 3000) and 6 (χ2 threshold 7000) display the number of bases occupied by overrepresented 8- to 14mers in a certain region, with overlaps only counted once, as a percentage. The outermost ring shows the difference (in classes) between a tetranucleotide parameter, oligonucleotide variance, and the 8- to 14mers in ring 5. Figures were created with JCircleGraph. Letters at the outermost ring indicate the regions of the six identified prophages (a–f) and five genomic islands (g–k; Winstanley et al., 2009). The most overrepresented 8- 14 bp oligomers in . The genome position of each oligo is plotted on the y-axis. A black dot is printed where an oligonucleotide occurs in non-coding regions and a green dot where an oligonucleotide occurs in coding regions. The figure was created with the program OligoViz (Davenport et al., 2009). The majority of the overrepresented 8–14 bp oligomers is located in coding sequences distributed all over the genome; only in the few cases of white vertical lines the respective oligonucleotide clusters in a few genome positions. Horizontal white lines indicate regions with an atypical oligonucleotide usage that lack these strain- or taxon-specific words and represent those parts of the accessory genome that are most foreign from the core.

Regions of Genome Plasticity

Elements of the accessory genome are located in all sections of the P. aeruginosa chromosome, not concentrated in some regions. Nevertheless, the uptake of accessory DNA apparently did not occur completely at random but at specific genomic loci that are prone to integration of special mobile elements. A comprehensive comparison of the genomes of strains PAO1, PA14, 2192, C3719, and PACS2 (Mathee et al., 2008) led to the definition of so-called “regions of genome plasticity” (RGPs). Mathee and co-workers searched for segments of DNA not conserved in all five genomes and designated any region containing a block of four or more contiguous ORFs that is missing in at least one of the genomes as an RGP. For each of these RGPs they defined the DNA contained in the accessory blocks and the ORFs annotated within. Also the RGP flanking ORFs conserved in all five strains were listed, referred to as “anchors,” which describe the genomic site used for the integration of the foreign DNA. The approach by Mathee et al. (2008) appears reasonable to describe accessory and core genome of P. aeruginosa strains, although small insertions are ignored and deletions affecting the core genome in some, but not all, compared strains will misassign the respective segment to the accessory genome. A secondary check of the oligonucleotide usage will correct these false positives. Mathee et al. (2008) initially defined 52 RGPs (no. 1–62 in Table 2). With the advent of the PA7 genome sequence, a further 18 elements were identified (RGPs 63–80; Roy et al., 2010). Table 2 moreover lists the novel RGPs 81–89 that comprise yet unknown RGPs from strains LESB58 (Winstanley et al., 2009) and PSE9 (Battle et al., 2009). On average each sequenced P. aeruginosa strain carries about 40 RGPs with insertions. The outlier was strain PA7 with 53 occupied RGPs. tRNA genes serve as integration sites for 20 RGPs. The 3′ end of tRNA genes and the subsequent nucleotides are known to serve as integration sites for ICEs and phage-like elements (Dobrindt et al., 2004). In the majority of RGPs, however, other target sequences had been utilized for the insertion corresponding with the diverse type and origin of the elements of the accessory genome of P. aeruginosa (Kung et al., 2010). Most target sequences are located in intergenic regions, but in three RGPs a single ORF was disrupted (RGPs 63, 64, and 88; Table 2). Interestingly, insertions in each of these three RGPs were only detected for a single strain so far, while in all other tested genomes the non-fragmented anchor-ORF was present. Three regions show an unusual local genome structure. Strains LESB58 and PA7 each carry hybrids of two adjacent RGPs. Moreover, in strain LESB58 a 137-kbp segment of the core genome 3′ to RGB15 was transposed upstream by 83 genes (84.3 kbp; Figure 3). No repeats flanking the segment or mobility-related genes such as transposase- or integrase-coding genes were identified so that the underlying mechanism of the transposition remains elusive.
Figure 3

Transposition of core genome DNA in LESB58. The genomic region with different core genome architecture is shown for strains PAO1 and LESB58. One hundred thirty-seven kbp of DNA (green) are located upstream of other core genome DNA blocks (gray) in LESB58 while occurring downstream of them in PAO1 (and other genomes). Surrounding core genome DNA arranged collinearly in both strains is shown in black, strain-specific insertions are represented by white areas. Genome coordinates of the borders of the core genome DNA blocks and numbers of the ORFs within are given for both strains. Accessory DNA blocks are described by the RGP number (see Table 2).

Transposition of core genome DNA in LESB58. The genomic region with different core genome architecture is shown for strains PAO1 and LESB58. One hundred thirty-seven kbp of DNA (green) are located upstream of other core genome DNA blocks (gray) in LESB58 while occurring downstream of them in PAO1 (and other genomes). Surrounding core genome DNA arranged collinearly in both strains is shown in black, strain-specific insertions are represented by white areas. Genome coordinates of the borders of the core genome DNA blocks and numbers of the ORFs within are given for both strains. Accessory DNA blocks are described by the RGP number (see Table 2).

The pKLC102/PAGI-2 ICE Family

Among the genomic islands of the P. aeruginosa accessory genome, members of the pKLC102/PAGI-2 family are highly prevalent. They represent a special group of ICEs that can be described as semi-conserved elements, as they generally consist of individual DNA blocks and sets of genes common to all members (Klockgether et al., 2008; Kung et al., 2010). pKLC102/PAGI-2 family islands have been detected in various bacterial species and genera, mainly in β- and γ-proteobacteria. The fact that a set of genes is conserved among all family members indicates a common origin from an ancient ancestor (Mohd-Zain et al., 2004). This conserved gene set accounts for structural and mobility-related features and conjugal transfer. Individual genes within the islands can encode a broad spectrum of different functions, among them catabolic pathways as well as virulence effectors. Existence of free episomal forms and/or transfer to other strains, even across species barriers, have been monitored for several pKLC102/PAGI-2-like islands, thus confirming their role for (ongoing) evolution of bacterial genomes and, due to the different “cargo” provided by these elements to the host strains, for the genome diversification within bacterial species and emergence of subgroup- or strain-specific phenotypes. For a detailed summary of the role of the common “backbone” genes for integration, mobilization and transfer of pKLC102/PAGI-2-like elements, the reader is referred to the recent review by Kung et al. (2010). The role of pKLC102/PAGI-2-like islands within the P. aeruginosa accessory genome, and thus their contribution to genome diversity, is illustrated by the abundance of many different islands of this family within the population. Hybridization results have indicated the presence of such islands in a majority of strains isolated from different habitats (Klockgether et al., 2007; Wiehlmann et al., 2007). Similarly, searching the available P. aeruginosa genome sequences for the typically conserved genes revealed their presence in all strains but PAO1. Six of the islands listed in Table 3 are members of that family: pKLC102, PAPI-1, PAGI-5, PAGI-2, PAGI-3, and LESGI-3. All of them are between 99 and 110 kbp in size. Clusters of typically conserved backbone genes were also detected in smaller islands like PAGI-4 or ExoU-A. As significant parts of the backbone, however, were missing, it was hypothesized that PAGI-4 and ExoU-A represent remaining fragments of formerly complete PAGI-2/pKLC102-like islands that underwent recombination and deletion events resulting in the loss of smaller (ExoU-A) or bigger parts (PAGI-4) of the original elements (Klockgether et al., 2004; Kulasekara et al., 2006). The mentioned P. aeruginosa islands split up into two subtypes: PAGI-2-like islands (PAGI-2, PAGI-3, and LESGI-3) contain a phage P4-related integrase gene and are inserted at tRNAGly genes in RGPs 27 or 29. The well described clc element providing features for metabolizing chlorinated aromatic compounds could be assigned to that subtype as well. Present in other Pseudomonas species as well as in Ralstonia and Burkholderia strains, transfer of clc to P. aeruginosa PAO1 by conjugation was shown in vitro (Gaillard et al., 2008). Upon transfer, genomic integration occurred at the usual tRNAGly genes in RGP27 or RGP29. The pKLC102-subtype islands (pKLC102, PAPI-1, PAGI-5) are endowed with a XerC/XerD-like integrase gene, and the two copies of a tRNALys gene in RGP7 and RGP41 can be used as insertion sites. Transfer of pKLC102-like elements from one RGP to the other has been demonstrated (Kiewitz et al., 2000; Qiu et al., 2006). The “fragmentary” pKLC102-like islands PAGI-4 and ExoU-A are also located in RGP7. The tRNALys gene in RP7 is also the insertion site for islands carrying the virulence-associated exoU gene and its cognate chaperone spcU gene, ExoU-B, ExoU-C, and PAPI-2. Although DNA typical for pKLC102-like islands is scarce in these exoU-positive islands, the common insertion site and a few motifs within their sequence indicate a descent from a pKLC102-like element as hypothesized for ExoU-A (Kulasekara et al., 2006). Kung et al. (2010) described the two subtypes as two families of P. aeruginosa ICEs. Due to the conserved function and synteny of the backbone genes, however, we prefer to consider them as members of one family with common ancestry (Klockgether et al., 2007, 2008). The pKLC102/PAGI-2-like islands share 35 conserved orthologs with a variable degree of amino acid identity between 35 and 100%. Divergent evolution from the ancestor might have caused the early formation of the two pKLC102- and PAGI-2 subtypes that exhibit higher average identity values among the conserved backbone genes and each carry a subfamily-specific set of genes (Figure 4). Eleven genes were specific for the PAGI-2-subtype and 39 genes specific for the pKLC102- subtype including a cluster of conjugative type IV sex pilin genes (Klockgether et al., 2004; Carter et al., 2010). Thus, pKLC102-/PAGI-2-family islands appear as mosaic pieces in P. aeruginosa genomes while they are small mosaics themselves, composed of conserved backbone, subtype-specific, and individual cargo genes.
Figure 4

Conserved genes in pKLC102-/PAGI-2-like genomic islands. PAGI-2 (Larbig et al., 2002) and pKLC102 (Klockgether et al., 2004) were chosen as representatives for the respective subtypes among the pKLC102-/PAGI-2 family. The annotated ORFs are labeled according to their conservation. ORFs appearing in all P. aeruginosa islands of this family (“backbone genes”) are shown in black. ORFs conserved within one of the subtypes are colored in gray. White blocks represent ORFs specific for the single islands (“individual cargo”). Intergenic regions (igr) marked with an asterisk indicate loci with no ORF annotated for pKLC102 but for the highly homologous sequences in other islands from this subtype. Please note that ORF C105 of PAGI-2 is homologous to DNA in pKLC102 described as a part of the replication origin oriV of this element. The other part of oriV containing 16 57 bp repeats (Klockgether et al., 2004) is not conserved among the island family, not even in other islands from the pKLC102 subtype.

Conserved genes in pKLC102-/PAGI-2-like genomic islands. PAGI-2 (Larbig et al., 2002) and pKLC102 (Klockgether et al., 2004) were chosen as representatives for the respective subtypes among the pKLC102-/PAGI-2 family. The annotated ORFs are labeled according to their conservation. ORFs appearing in all P. aeruginosa islands of this family (“backbone genes”) are shown in black. ORFs conserved within one of the subtypes are colored in gray. White blocks represent ORFs specific for the single islands (“individual cargo”). Intergenic regions (igr) marked with an asterisk indicate loci with no ORF annotated for pKLC102 but for the highly homologous sequences in other islands from this subtype. Please note that ORF C105 of PAGI-2 is homologous to DNA in pKLC102 described as a part of the replication origin oriV of this element. The other part of oriV containing 16 57 bp repeats (Klockgether et al., 2004) is not conserved among the island family, not even in other islands from the pKLC102 subtype. Due to their size, islands of this family can represent a major portion of the accessory genome. Strains with one or two large pKLC102/PAGI-2-family elements are common, but higher numbers per genome are possible. P. aeruginosa strain C harbors PAGI-2 and pKLC102, but two more sets of backbone ORFs have been identified in the chromosome indicating four related elements in total, with an overall DNA sequence length of more than 360 kbp (own unpublished data). Of the seven genomes presented in Table 2, six contain large pKLC102/PAGI-2-family islands. Strains PA14, C3719, and PA7 each harbor one pKLC102-like island in RGP41 or, in case of PA7, in RGP7. LESB58 also contains one island, but of the PAGI-2 subtype (LESGI-3 in RGP27). Two islands each are located in the 2192- and the PACS2 genomes. Both strains also harbor a pKLC102-like insertion in RGP41 and a PAGI-2-related island, which is in RGP29 for strain 2192 and in RGP27 in PACS2. The island in 2192 inserted at RGP29 is a nearly identical copy of PAGI-2 itself but is interestingly accompanied by another island of comparable size, the so-called Dit-island which is distinct from the pKLC102/PAGI-2 family (Mathee et al., 2008). Thus an extremely large insertion of about 220 kbp is present in RGP29, which probably resulted from successive acquisition of two elements using the same chromosomal integration site. The RGP41-insertion in strain PA7 also provides hints for a combination of genome islands. Next to the pKLC102-like island with all typically conserved genes a DNA block with a second copy of some of the backbone genes is located, resembling a fragment of a second pKLC102-like element linked to the first one (Klockgether et al., 2008; Roy et al., 2010).

Replacement Islands

Table 2 also lists the loci in the core genome that are under diversifying selection, the so-called replacement islands: RGP9 (flagellin glycosylation genes), RGP31 (O-antigen biosynthesis genes), RGP60 (pilin gene), and RGP73 (pyoverdine gene cluster). The RGPs only encompass those genes that fulfill the definition of less than 70% nucleotide sequence identity between homologs and thus do not necessarily comprise the complete functional units (Mathee et al., 2008). The types of each replacement island were identified by comparative sequencing of the respective gene clusters in P. aeruginosa strain collections. The 20 known O-antigen serotypes, for example, were assigned to 11 groups according to the criterion of more than 98% sequence identity in the major O-antigen biosynthesis gene cluster (Raymond et al., 2002). RGP60, containing the pilA gene that encodes the major subunit for type IV attachment pili, was classified into groups I–V (Kus et al., 2004). This “major pilin” region adjacent to a tRNAThr gene contains, besides pilA for all groups but group II, several tfp genes that are involved in type IV pilus assembly and modification. More tfp genes are located downstream in the “minor pilin” region. Each of the five major pilin regions is associated with a specific set of minor pilins, and unrelated strains with the same major pilin type have identical minor pilin genes (Giltner et al., 2011). The absolute linkage disequilibrium between major and minor pilin groups provides evidence that both regions were derived from one large island. Consistent with this interpretation more pilin assembly genes are located between the major and minor pilin groups. These genes, however, were not subject of diversifying selection. Moreover a tRNA gene cluster is located between the major and the minor pilin region that serves as a hotspot for integration of large pKLC102-like islands (RGP41). Thus, the genome distance between major and minor pilin gene clusters varies between 136 kbp in strain PA14 and only 29 kbp in PAO1. The pyoverdine gene clusters I, II, and III encode the three pyoverdine types and their specific receptor. Intratype divergence driven by recombination, positive selection, and horizontal gene transfer have enhanced the diversity of this genomic region (Smith et al., 2005). The two flagellins a and b differ in their primary amino acid sequence and their glycosylation from each other (Spangenberg et al., 1996). b-type flagellins are conserved in sequence and glycosylation (Verma et al., 2006). In contrast, six fliC single nucleotide substitutions (SNPs) haplotypes (Spangenberg et al., 1996) and differential glycosylation patterns lead to a large diversity of a-type flagellins (Arora et al., 2004). The variability of the a-type glycosylation gene cluster (RGP9) is high, even within the subtypes A1 and A2 that were defined by phylogenetic relatedness of amino acid sequences.

The P. aeruginosa Pangenome

The pangenome represents the complete gene pool of a bacterial species. Thus the description of a pangenome depends on the amount of sequence data available. For species with an extended accessory genome like P. aeruginosa, the addition of each new genome sequence will enlarge the overall pool of genes. The size of the core genome that is present in all strains will decrease concurrently. To define the core genome and pangenome, the genomes are sequentially screened for orthologs by searching for reciprocal best BLAST hits. Genes that lack an ortholog in the already investigated gene pool are added to the pangenome. We used the tool “Comparative Genome Search” provided by the Pseudomonas Genome Database to define the number of orthologs representing reciprocal best blast hits in the four fully sequenced genomes of PAO1, PA14, LESB58, and PA7 (BLASTP comparisons, E-value cutoff: 1 × 10−4). The tool also allows the determination of individual genes per genome, so the number of genes contributing to the pangenome could be counted with paralogs excluded. The results are shown in Figure 5. Please note that the PAO1 gene pool is lower than the overall number of ORFs in this genome (5520 compared to 5570) due to this exclusion of paralogs. As expected the core genome decreases and the pangenome increases each by a few hundred genes with the addition of a new genome. Although the analysis of just four genomes is insufficient for the extrapolation of the gene pool of core genome and pangenome of P. aeruginosa, we can assume that the pangenome does not approach a saturation value. Each novel genome sequence will contribute a yet unknown gene set to the pangenome. The large genomic islands of the pKLC102/PAGI-2 family contribute a broad variety of cargo to the species. Each strain possesses an individual set of islands that is acquired by horizontal gene transfer preferentially from beta- and gamma-proteobacteria (Klockgether et al., 2008). In other words, P. aeruginosa has wide, but not unrestricted access to the gene pool of prokaryotes.
Figure 5

The . The extent of the P. aeruginosa core- and pan-genome is shown as a stepwise development going along with the availability of complete genome sequences. The numbers at the lower branch give the amount of genes identified as best reciprocal blast hits in the indicated genomes (core genome). Numbers of the upper branch describe amount of genes making up the pangenome. For each genome the number of genes are added that are neither ortho- nor paralogs of genes from the existing pool.

The . The extent of the P. aeruginosa core- and pan-genome is shown as a stepwise development going along with the availability of complete genome sequences. The numbers at the lower branch give the amount of genes identified as best reciprocal blast hits in the indicated genomes (core genome). Numbers of the upper branch describe amount of genes making up the pangenome. For each genome the number of genes are added that are neither ortho- nor paralogs of genes from the existing pool.

Intraclonal Genome Diversity

The comparison of published genome sequences of clonally unrelated strains uncovered an interclonal sequence diversity of the P. aeruginosa core genome of 0.5–0.7% (Spencer et al., 2003; Cramer et al., 2011). The intraclonal diversity of members of the same clonal complex, however, is yet unknown. Of the strains with completely sequenced genomes, only strain PA14 belongs to a common clonal complex in the P. aeruginosa population (Wiehlmann et al., 2007). Hence we decided to sequence another strain of the PA14 clonal complex by Illumina sequencing-by-synthesis technology [study accession number ERP000390 at the Nucleotide Read Archive (ENA) of the EBI]. This strain RN3 was isolated from the first P. aeruginosa-positive airway specimen of an individual with cystic fibrosis who was living in North–West Germany. Strain PA14 is a clinical isolate from California. Thus the two strains are of unrelated geographic origin. The strain PA14 and strain RN3 genomes match in genome size and differ in 231 SNPs from each other (Table 4) which corresponds to a sequence diversity of 3.5 × 10−5. Transitions (n = 148) occurred significantly more frequently than the expected ratio of transitions to transversions of 55: 176 of a random distribution (χ2 = 206.3; P < 0.001). The number of SNPs in inter- and intragenic regions roughly corresponded with their proportions in the genome. Within the coding regions synonymous SNPs were significantly overrepresented (χ2 = 23.2; P < 0.001) indicating that de novo amino acid substitutions had been subject to purifying selection. Single nucleotide substitutions in RN3 sequence (compared to PA14 reference). 1Protein length 180 aa instead of 264. 2Two SNPs in one codon. 3Annotated as probably inactive protein fragment/putative frameshift gene. 4Next stop 18 codons downstream. Of the 231 SNPs, only 33 SNPs followed the statistics of a random distribution in the genome (Figure 6). In other words, 198 SNPs were non-randomly distributed in the genome implying that the affected loci had been subject to diversifying selection.
Figure 6

Intraclonal SNP diversity of the . Mapping of the RN3 genome onto the PA14 genome uncovered 231 SNPs. The figure depicts the genomic distribution of the distance between two adjacent SNPs (nearest neighbors). The red graphs show the observed distribution that is compared with a random genomic distribution of the same number of 231 SNPs (blue graphs, one-dimensional random walk statistics). The two semilogarithmic plots visualize the deviation from a random distribution at either a global scale (insert) or with focus on the hotspots of sequence diversity (large figure).

Intraclonal SNP diversity of the . Mapping of the RN3 genome onto the PA14 genome uncovered 231 SNPs. The figure depicts the genomic distribution of the distance between two adjacent SNPs (nearest neighbors). The red graphs show the observed distribution that is compared with a random genomic distribution of the same number of 231 SNPs (blue graphs, one-dimensional random walk statistics). The two semilogarithmic plots visualize the deviation from a random distribution at either a global scale (insert) or with focus on the hotspots of sequence diversity (large figure). The major hotspot is the phage Pf1-like gene cluster (PA14_48890–PA14_49000) with 87 SNPs, i.e., 38% of all SNPs. Thus phage Pf1 seems to be the most rapidly evolving part of the PA14 genome consistent with the view that phages span a high degree of genetic diversity and are prone to frequent horizontal transfer (Hatfull, 2008). Non-synonymous SNPs were mainly found in the functional categories of transcriptional regulators, membranes, cellular appendages, transport, and secretion (Table 4). Hotspots of sequence diversity in single genes between the PA14 and RN3 genomes are ftsZ, armB (mexH), and cynS with six, five, and four SNPs, respectively. FtsZ is the major tubulin-like cytoskeletal protein in the bacterial cytokinesis machine (Erickson et al., 2010) and hence we noted with surprise that the FtsZ proteins of strains PA14 and RN3 differ at five positions in their amino acid sequence. The substitutions P-L, M-L, G-D, T-N, and P-T are located within a stretch of 35 amino acids of the 394 aa protein and are all not neutral (Table 4). MexH is a component of the MexGHI-OpmD efflux pump that is required for biofilm formation (Southey-Pillig et al., 2005), facilitates cell-to-cell communication and promotes virulence and growth in P. aeruginosa (Aendekerk et al., 2005). MexH of strains PA14 and RN3 differ by three amino acid substitutions (Q-E, T-A, and H-S) in three distant domains of the protein from each other. CynS encodes a cyanase (EC 4.2.1.104) that catalyzes the decomposition of cyanate into CO2 and ammonium (Luque-Almagro et al., 2008). The intraclonal diversity of cyanase between RN3 and PA14 of four amino acid substitutions is similar in number and localization to that of the completely sequenced P. aeruginosa strains, i.e., 5–11 amino acid substitutions clustering in the N-terminal region of CynS. Key genes were also affected by non-synonymous SNPs that may modulate the function of the gene products. The DNA-directed RNA polymerase RpoB of strain RN3 carries a substitution of a glycine by an aspartate, and the global regulator RetS of the sessile and planktonic lifestyle of P. aeruginosa, which is involved in the transition from acute to chronic infections (Goodman et al., 2004), harbors a substitution of an aspartate by an alanine. Of the 34 observed amino acid substitution types, nine are classified by the Dayhoff (1978) matrix as uncommon and associated with an impact on protein function. In contrast, only 12 of the 20 most common neutral amino acid changes were seen. In summary, SNPs non-randomly targeted elements of the cell surface and uncommon non-neutral substitutions (e.g., K-E) were overrepresented in the affected proteins. These facts suggest that in the investigated case the intraclonal diversity did not evolve by random drift, but was driven by selective forces. Strain RN3 was isolated from the first P. aeruginosa-positive specimen taken from an individual with cystic fibrosis. Thus the portion of adaptive mutations that typically emerge during chronic colonization of cystic fibrosis airways (Smith et al., 2006) should be low. Nevertheless some sequence differences between RN3 and PA14 could provide RN3 with selective advantage to adapt and persist in cystic fibrosis airways. Obvious candidates are loci encoding efflux pumps (mexH), major transcriptional regulators (retS), and siderophore (pvdD), cyanide (cynS), or quinolone (phnA) biosynthesis, respectively. The major take home message of our endeavor to compare the intraclonal genome diversity of strains of distant geographic origin was the unexpectedly low substitution rate. Statistical analysis provides strong evidence that nucleotide substitutions in coding regions were under purifying selection so that only a low number of substitutions was fixed. This versatile, ubiquitous and phylogenetically ancient organism apparently does not need many de novo mutations if it conquers a new habitat. The next step to understand the molecular evolution of intraclonal diversity would be the determination of the relative contributions of de novo mutation versus recombination. To accomplish this task, a larger collection of clone PA14 strains than just two isolates will have to be studied (see Spratt, 2004, for an appropriate study design).

Perspectives

Only four completely sequenced P. aeruginosa genomes are officially deposited as finished genomes in GenBank. Draft genomes exist for a five further genomes and several dozen P. aeruginosa projects are deposited in the ENA hosted by EMBL-EBI (see text footnote 1). Many of the projects were done for the purpose of (re)sequencing variants of already known strains. Thorough genome assemblies and functional annotations are probably intended only in a minority of cases. But nevertheless an immense increase in P. aeruginosa genome data is expected to become available in the near future due to the on-going revolution of sequencing technologies. In particular, the sequencing of strains from environmental habitats should provide us with an unbiased overview of the genetic repertoire of the P. aeruginosa population.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Intragenic positionntLocus_tagaaGene nameEncoded product
72440T – CPA14_00740K – EPutative lipoprotein
96307A – CPA14_00970syn.Hypothetical protein
273734C – TPA14_03110D – NHypothetical protein
477483G – APA14_05410syn.chpCputative chemotaxis protein
480880T – CPA14_05450syn.16S ribosomal RNA methyltransferase RsmE
480915T – CPA14_05450K – E16S ribosomal RNA methyltransferase RsmE
522777G – TPA14_05890E – stop1putative stomatin-like protein
741080G – APA14_08660tRNAGly
747764G – APA14_08760G – DrpoBDNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta
791890A – GPA14_09280N – DpchFPyochelin synthetase
8880382C – TPA14_10290P – LacoRTranscriptional regulator AcoR
8880392T – GPA14_10290P – LacoRTranscriptional regulator AcoR
927917T – CPA14_10770I – TPutative sensor/response regulator hybrid
982940A – GPA14_11290syn.Putative permease
1071133G – CPA14_124303ladSHomolog to lost adherence sensor LadS
1082958A – GPA14_12630syn.Putative ATP-dependent helicase
1356548G – CPA14_15920R – GyhjEMajor facilitator transporter
1441164T – CPA14_16820syn.Putative efflux transmembrane protein
1468998C – TPA14_17130syn.dxr1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase
1551564G – APA14_18080A – VTetR family transcriptional regulator
1558205A – GPA14_18150syn.acsLPutative acetyl-CoA synthetase
1612742A –GPA14_18740syn.argGArgininosuccinate synthase
1640196G – TPA14_18985P – HHypothetical protein
1640394A – GPA14_18985F – SHypothetical protein
1880872C – GPA14_21690A – Glhr1Putative ATP-dependent DNA helicase
1960256C – APA14_22520R – LHypothetical protein
2027678C – GPA14_23360P – RwzzO-antigen chain length regulator
2149425T – CPA14_24600syn.Putative carboxypeptidase
2156146C – APA14_24665Q – KHypothetical protein
2209674A – GPA14_25250K – EgapAGlyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
2318606A – GPA14_26600syn.RNA polymerase sigma factor
2407435C – GPA14_27755syn.yliJGlutathione S-transferase
2407463A – GPA14_27755K – EyliJGlutathione S-transferase
2510099A – GPA14_29030T – APutative FMN oxidoreductase
2545609T – CPA14_29390syn.Hypothetical protein
2545663T – CPA14_29390syn.Hypothetical protein
2553747T – CPA14_29440D – GLysR family transcriptional regulator
2651339T – CPA14_30600F – LPutative permease
2651357A – GPA14_30600N – DPutative permease
2762006A – GPA14_31750K – EPutative acyltransferase
2787777C – GPA14_320153czcAHomolog to RND efflux transporter CzcA
2787784T – GPA14_320153czcAHomolog to RND efflux transporter CzcA
2807266G – CPA14_32300V – LPutative kinase
2885933G – CPA14_32985syn.gcvH2Glycine cleavage system protein H
2955357A – GPA14_33600syn.Hypothetical protein
2955433A – GPA14_33600syn.Hypothetical protein
2955468A – GPA14_33600syn.Hypothetical protein
2985345A – GPA14_33650K – EpvdDPyoverdine synthetase D
3198441T – GPA14_35940syn.Acyl-CoA synthetase
3373667G – CPA14_37830syn.iscSPutative pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme
3374601A – GPA14_37830F – SiscSPutative pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme
3387854A – CPA14_37965Y – ScynSCyanate hydratase
3387881A – CPA14_37965M – LcynSCyanate hydratase
3387884T – CPA14_37965F – LcynSCyanate hydratase
3387941A – CPA14_37965M – LcynSCyanate hydratase
3390498A – CPA14_38000Stop – S4Hypothetical protein
3423281A – GPA14_38410syn.amrB/mexHMultidrug efflux protein
3423414C – GPA14_38410Q – EamrB/mexHMultidrug efflux protein
3424176A – GPA14_38410T – AamrB/mexHMultidrug efflux protein
3424199A – GPA14_38410syn.amrB/mexHMultidrug efflux protein
3425614A – TPA14_38410H – SamrB/mexHMultidrug efflux protein
3442543G – APA14_38580G – DHypothetical protein
3443292C – GPA14_38580P – AHypothetical protein
3541978G – APA14_39750syn.Putative amino acid permease
3543662A – GPA14_39770T – APutative regulatory protein
3558172A – GPA14_39910F – LphzE2Phenazine biosynthesis protein PhzE
3559401T – CPA14_39925K – EphzD2Phenazine biosynthesis protein PhzD
3566716A – GPA14_40020Q – RHypothetical protein
3566730A – GPA14_40020K – EHypothetical protein
3566749A – GPA14_40020Q – RHypothetical protein
3566751A – GPA14_40020N – DHypothetical protein
3566769A – GPA14_40020K – EHypothetical protein
3566788A – GPA14_40020Q – RHypothetical protein
3670384A – GPA14_41150syn.Putative permease of ABC transporter
3711749T – CPA14_41563syn.cobAUroporphyrin-III C-methyltransferase
3711791G – CPA14_41563V – LcobAUroporphyrin-III C-methyltransferase
3764383A – GPA14_42220I – MMembrane sensor domain-containing protein
3769180C – GPA14_42250syn.pscLType III secretion system protein
3879553A – GPA14_43570F – LHypothetical protein
3906764G – CPA14_43870R – GHypothetical protein
3933352C – GPA14_44190syn.Putative sugar MFS transporter
4346242C – GPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346254G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346325A – GPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346329G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346413G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346434G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346485A – GPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346497G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346500G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346665C – TPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346713C – TPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346731T – CPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346763A – GPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346845A – GPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346890A – CPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346926G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4346938C – TPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347034C – TPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347190A – GPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347211G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347241G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347256C – TPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347283T – CPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347289G – CPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347310T – CPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347322T – CPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347346C – GPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347358G – APA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347376C – GPA14_48890syn.Hypothetical protein
4347642G – APA14_48900A – VHypothetical protein
4347673T – APA14_48900T – SHypothetical protein
4347701C – APA14_48900syn.Hypothetical protein
4347825G – TPA14_48910P – THypothetical protein
4348119C – TPA14_48910A – THypothetical protein
4348192A – GPA14_48910syn.Hypothetical protein
4348221G – APA14_48910P – SHypothetical protein
4348224T – CPA14_48910T – AHypothetical protein
4348308G – APA14_48910syn.Hypothetical protein
4348378G – TPA14_48910syn.Hypothetical protein
4348501A – GPA14_48910syn.Hypothetical protein
4348684A – GPA14_48910syn.Hypothetical protein
4348966T – GPA14_48910syn.Hypothetical protein
4349128A – CPA14_48920syn.Bacteriophage protein
4350200A – TPA14_48930syn.Putative coat protein A of bacteriophage Pf1
4350213G – CPA14_48930A – GPutative coat protein A of bacteriophage Pf1
4350484T – CPA14_48930N – DPutative coat protein A of bacteriophage Pf1
4350502T – CPA14_48930T – APutative coat protein A of bacteriophage Pf1
4350656G – APA14_48930syn.Putative coat protein A of bacteriophage Pf1
4350884A – GPA14_48940syn.coaBCoat protein B of bacteriophage Pf1
4350911G – CPA14_48940syn.coaBCoat protein B of bacteriophage Pf1
4350917A – GPA14_48940syn.coaBCoat protein B of bacteriophage Pf1
4350941A – GPA14_48940syn.coaBCoat protein B of bacteriophage Pf1
4350959T – CPA14_48940syn.coaBCoat protein B of bacteriophage Pf1
4351186C – TPA14_48950A – THypothetical protein
4351199G – APA14_48950syn.Hypothetical protein
4351316A – GPA14_48950syn.Hypothetical protein
4351503G – APA14_48970syn.Helix destabilizing protein of bacteriophage Pf1
4351563T – CPA14_48970syn.Helix destabilizing protein of bacteriophage Pf1
4351617A – GPA14_48970syn.Helix destabilizing protein of bacteriophage Pf1
4351641C – GPA14_48970syn.Helix destabilizing protein of bacteriophage Pf1
4351722A – GPA14_48970syn.Helix destabilizing protein of bacteriophage Pf1
4351857G – APA14_48970syn.Helix destabilizing protein of bacteriophage Pf1
4352075A – GPA14_48980syn.Hypothetical protein
4352106T – CPA14_48980D – GHypothetical protein
4352113C – APA14_48980D – YHypothetical protein
4352144G – CPA14_48980S – RHypothetical protein
4352234G – APA14_48980syn.Hypothetical protein
4352294G – CPA14_48980syn.Hypothetical protein
4352384C – TPA14_48980syn.Hypothetical protein
4352465G – TPA14_48990syn.Hypothetical protein
4352471G – APA14_48990syn.Hypothetical protein
4352545C – APA14_48990A – SHypothetical protein
4352560G – APA14_48990P – SHypothetical protein
4352594C – GPA14_48990syn.Hypothetical protein
4352607C – TPA14_48990R – QHypothetical protein
4352676G – CPA14_48990A – GHypothetical protein
4352700T – CPA14_48990H – RHypothetical protein
4352821T – CPA14_49000I – VHypothetical protein
43528652A – CPA14_49000I – GHypothetical protein
43528662T – CPA14_49000I – GHypothetical protein
4352921C – APA14_49000M – IHypothetical protein
4450619T – GPA14_50060L – RHypothetical protein
4565005C – GPA14_51360G – AphnAHnthranilate synthase component I
4565040A – GPA14_51360syn.phnAHnthranilate synthase component I
4565093C – GPA14_51360G – RphnAHnthranilate synthase component I
4707658G – CPA14_53110syn.Hxidoreductase
4707787G – CPA14_53110syn.Oxidoreductase
4760743A – GPA14_53670L – PHypothetical protein
4901696A – GPA14_55180M – VmigAGlycosyl transferase
4912690C – TPA14_55330D – NHypothetical protein
4947683A – GPA14_55600H – RHypothetical protein
4997786T – CPA14_55980K – EyjgRHypothetical protein
5041775A – TPA14_56550syn.Hypothetical protein
51032242A – CPA14_57275P – LftsZCell division protein FtsZ
51032252G – APA14_57275P – LftsZCell division protein FtsZ
5103259T – GPA14_57275M – LftsZCell division protein FtsZ
5103291C – TPA14_57275G – DftsZCell division protein FtsZ
5103303G – TPA14_57275T – NftsZCell division protein FtsZ
5103322G – TPA14_57275P – TftsZCell division protein FtsZ
5236534A – GPA14_58760syn.pilCType 4 fimbrial biogenesis protein pilC
5404627C – TPA14_60630L – FHypothetical protein
5464577C – TPA14_61200G – DHypothetical protein
5530315A – GPA14_62000F – LhitAFerric iron-binding periplasmic protein HitA
5722900A – CPA14_64230D – AretS/rtsMRetS, regulator of exopolysaccharide and type III Secretion
5757525G – CPA14_64620Q – EPutative oxidoreductase
5757527G – CPA14_64620P – RPutative oxidoreductase
5809365T – CPA14_65190K – EyjfHTrmH family RNA methyltransferase, group 3
5866730T – GPA14_65860syn.Putative two-component sensor
5905079A – GPA14_66270syn.glnEGlutamine-synthetase adenylyltransferase
5968025C – GPA14_66820P – AphaC1Poly(3-hydroxyalkanoic acid) synthase 1
6070122T – CPA14_680203Homolog to hypothetical protein PA5149
6076066G – CPA14_68100syn.Hypothetical protein
6412470G – CPA14_71930R – GwbpXGlycosyltransferase WbpX
6441338T – CPA14_72300L – PHypothetical protein
Intergenic positionntIntergenic region
151966A – GigrPA14_01660-01670
187759G – TigrPA14_02050-02060
208430T – GigrPA14_02310-02330
208433G – CigrPA14_02310-02330
888497A – CigrPA14_10290-10300
966217T – CigrPA14_11110-11120
1144646C – GigrPA14_13320-13330
1375947A – GigrPA14_16150-16160
1725505A – GigrPA14_20020-20030
1748240T – CigrPA14_20290-20300
1923008C – TigrPA14_22080-22090
2354149A – GigrPA14_27090-27100
2362330A – CigrPA14_27180-27190
2362363G – CigrPA14_27180-27190
2589402C – TigrPA14_29890-29900
2840442T – CigrPA14_32700-32710
2840444T – CigrPA14_32700-32710
3281477G – CigrPA14_36810-36820
3356495G – CigrPA14_37680-37690
3515863T – CigrPA14_39480-39500
3662614T – CigrPA14_41070-41080
4347602G – CigrPA14_48890-48900
4351470T – GigrPA14_48960-48970
4352019T – GigrPA14_48970-48980
4352023C – GigrPA14_48970-48980
4352432G – AigrPA14_48980-48990
4352433G – AigrPA14_48980-48990
4407236A – GigrPA14_49540-49560
4659805A – GigrPA14_52530-52540
4708161A – GigrPA14_53110-53120
5198405T – CigrPA14_58360-58375
5200474A – CigrPA14_58380-58390
5565118A – GigrPA14_62380-62390
5648548A – GigrPA14_63280-63290
5648573A – GigrPA14_63280-63290
5792010A – GigrPA14_64980-64990

1Protein length 180 aa instead of 264.

2Two SNPs in one codon.

3Annotated as probably inactive protein fragment/putative frameshift gene.

4Next stop 18 codons downstream.

  56 in total

1.  Monitoring genome evolution ex vivo: reversible chromosomal integration of a 106 kb plasmid at two tRNA(Lys) gene loci in sequential Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway isolates.

Authors:  C Kiewitz; K Larbig; J Klockgether; C Weinel; B Tümmler
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Transferable antibiotic resistance elements in Haemophilus influenzae share a common evolutionary origin with a diverse family of syntenic genomic islands.

Authors:  Zaini Mohd-Zain; Sarah L Turner; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Andrew K Lilley; Thomas J Inzana; A Jane Duncan; Rosalind M Harding; Derek W Hood; Timothy E Peto; Derrick W Crook
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Genetic diversity of flagellins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  C Spangenberg; T Heuer; C Bürger; B Tümmler
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1996-11-04       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Genetic characterization indicates that a specific subpopulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with keratitis infections.

Authors:  Rosalind M K Stewart; Lutz Wiehlmann; Kevin E Ashelford; Stephanie J Preston; Eliane Frimmersdorf; Barry J Campbell; Timothy J Neal; Neil Hall; Stephen Tuft; Stephen B Kaye; Craig Winstanley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Interstrain transfer of the large pathogenicity island (PAPI-1) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Qiu; Aditi U Gurkar; Stephen Lory
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable.

Authors:  Mark W Silby; Craig Winstanley; Scott A C Godfrey; Stuart B Levy; Robert W Jackson
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 16.408

7.  Evidence for diversifying selection at the pyoverdine locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Eric E Smith; Elizabeth H Sims; David H Spencer; Rajinder Kaul; Maynard V Olson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Bacteriophage genomics.

Authors:  Graham F Hatfull
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 7.934

9.  Significant differences in type IV pilin allele distribution among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis (CF) versus non-CF patients.

Authors:  Julianne V Kus; Elizabeth Tullis; Dennis G Cvitkovitch; Lori L Burrows
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Impact of large chromosomal inversions on the adaptation and evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronically colonizing cystic fibrosis lungs.

Authors:  Andreas U Kresse; Sriramulu D Dinesh; Karen Larbig; Ute Römling
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  99 in total

1.  Immunological considerations in the development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccines.

Authors:  Sarah M Baker; James B McLachlan; Lisa A Morici
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Parallel evolutionary paths to produce more than one Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm phenotype.

Authors:  Janne G Thöming; Jürgen Tomasch; Matthias Preusse; Michal Koska; Nora Grahl; Sarah Pohl; Sven D Willger; Volkhard Kaever; Mathias Müsken; Susanne Häussler
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 7.290

3.  Determinants for persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitals: interplay between resistance, virulence and biofilm formation.

Authors:  S J Kaiser; N T Mutters; A DeRosa; C Ewers; U Frank; F Günther
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Achromobacter sp. clonal selection leads to successive waves of contamination of water in dental care units.

Authors:  Fatima Abdouchakour; Chloé Dupont; Delphine Grau; Fabien Aujoulat; Patricia Mournetas; Hélène Marchandin; Sylvie Parer; Philippe Gibert; Jean Valcarcel; Estelle Jumas-Bilak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Highly variable individual donor cell fates characterize robust horizontal gene transfer of an integrative and conjugative element.

Authors:  François Delavat; Sara Mitri; Serge Pelet; Jan Roelof van der Meer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Differential expression of the major catalase, KatA in the two wild type Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PAO1 and PA14.

Authors:  Bi-O Kim; In-Young Chung; You-Hee Cho
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  Comparative genomic analyses of 17 clinical isolates of Gardnerella vaginalis provide evidence of multiple genetically isolated clades consistent with subspeciation into genovars.

Authors:  Azad Ahmed; Josh Earl; Adam Retchless; Sharon L Hillier; Lorna K Rabe; Thomas L Cherpes; Evan Powell; Benjamin Janto; Rory Eutsey; N Luisa Hiller; Robert Boissy; Margaret E Dahlgren; Barry G Hall; J William Costerton; J Christopher Post; Fen Z Hu; Garth D Ehrlich
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Cystic Fibrosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the Host-Microbe Interface.

Authors:  Sankalp Malhotra; Don Hayes; Daniel J Wozniak
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 9.  Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Anders Folkesson; Lars Jelsbak; Lei Yang; Helle Krogh Johansen; Oana Ciofu; Niels Høiby; Søren Molin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa adaptation and evolution in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Elio Rossi; Ruggero La Rosa; Jennifer A Bartell; Rasmus L Marvig; Janus A J Haagensen; Lea M Sommer; Søren Molin; Helle Krogh Johansen
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 60.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.