| Literature DB >> 30353027 |
Zi-Lun Lai1, Ching-Hung Tseng2, Hsiu J Ho1, Cynthia K Y Cheung3, Jian-Yong Lin2, Yi-Ju Chen4,5, Fu-Chou Cheng6, Yao-Chun Hsu7,8, Jaw-Town Lin9,10, Emad M El-Omar11, Chun-Ying Wu12,13,14,15,16,17,18.
Abstract
Diet and exercise are conventional methods for controlling body weight and are linked to alterations in gut microbiota. However, the associations of diet, exercise, and gut microbiota in the control of obesity remain largely unknown. In the present study, using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), normal fat diet (NFD), exercise and their combination resulted in improved metabolic profiles in comparison to sedentary lifestyle with high fat diet (HFD). Moreover, diet exerted more influence than exercise in shaping the gut microbiota. HFD-fed mice receiving FMT from NFD-exercised donors not only showed remarkably reduced food efficacy, but also mitigated metabolic profiles (p < 0.05). The transmissible beneficial effects of FMT were associated with bacterial genera Helicobacter, Odoribacter and AF12 and overrepresentation of oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis genes. Our findings demonstrate that the beneficial effects of diet and exercise are transmissible via FMT, suggesting a potential therapeutic treatment for obesity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30353027 PMCID: PMC6199268 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33893-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of study design. Seven groups of mice were defined in this study. Abbreviations indicate treatments: H, sedentary mice fed high fat diet (n = 6); HE, exercised H mice (n = 7); N, sedentary mice fed normal fat diet (n = 7); NE, exercised N mice (n = 6); H_FHE: H mice receiving FMT from HE (n = 7); H_FNE, H mice receiving FMT from NE (n = 7); N_FNE: N mice receiving FMT from NE (n = 7). Icon with number indicates FMT donor group; 2 refers to HE and 6 refers to NE.
Figure 2Food consumption and efficacy of each group. (A) Food consumption per group was recorded weekly. Data were adjusted to n = 7 and compared between non-FMT and FMT recipient groups and p values (t-test) were obtained. (B) Food efficacy of each group was estimated as grams of body weight gain per 100 g food consumed. Data are shown in the figure.
Figure 3Physiological parameters and inflammatory gene expressions in mice. (A) Body weights of all mice involved in the experiment were measured weekly. Data are expressed as mean ± SE per group. (B–I) Metabolic and inflammatory parameters are expressed as 5% truncated means (data within 5–95% quantile) ± SE. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test, vs. H). Data points are shown in semi-transparency. IPGTT was measured monthly and the measurement at the end of experiment is presented. Other parameters and gene expression levels were determined after mice were euthanized. IPGTT, intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test; Tnf, tumor necrosis factor gene; Il1a, interleukin 1 alpha gene; Pparg, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; LDL, low density lipoprotein.
Figure 4Principal coordinates analysis of mice gut microbiota. PCoA was conducted based on Bray–Curtis distance of operational taxonomic unit (OTU) relative abundance in mice gut microbiota. Groups are distinguished by colors. The significance (p value) of between-group inertia was evaluated by Monte-Carlo test (with 1000 permutations). (A) PCo ordination of mice gut microbiota before FMT. (B) PCo ordination of mice gut microbiota after FMT.
Figure 5Top genera based on LEfSe and stratified by diet, exercise and FMT. Based on the genera relative abundance after FMT (i.e., week 24), the top 5 genera in each LEfSe comparison (p < 0.05) were obtained. The log-2 ratio of genus average relative abundance is presented as x-axis and genus names are presented as inlet. (A) Genera in LEfSe comparisons stratified by diet. (B) Genera in LEfSe comparisons stratified by exercise. (C) Genera in LEfSe comparisons stratified by FMT. NA, not applicable; avg., average; rel., relative; abd., abundance.