Francesco Ceci1,2,3, Paolo Castellucci4, Tiziano Graziani4, Andrea Farolfi4, Cristina Fonti4, Filippo Lodi4, Stefano Fanti4. 1. Metropolitan Nuclear Medicine of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. francesco.ceci3@unibo.it. 2. Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, UCLA Nuclear Medicine, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA. francesco.ceci3@unibo.it. 3. Metropolitan Nuclear Medicine of Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. francesco.ceci3@unibo.it. 4. Metropolitan Nuclear Medicine of Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was the evaluation of Gallium 68 (68Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) detection rate, for identifying the site of prostate cancer (PCa) relapse (local vs systemic), stratifying the population according to different clinical stages of biochemical recurrence (BCR). Secondary aims were: 1) to evaluate the association of clinical/pathologic features and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate, 2) to compare 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with other imaging procedures, and 3) to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) in a per-patient analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This population was enrolled through a prospective, open label, single-center trial performed at the Nuclear Medicine of the University Hospital of Bologna (Eudract: 2015-004589-27 OsSC). The inclusion criteria were: (1) proven PCa, (2) surgery or radiotherapy as definitive therapy, (3) proven BCR, (4) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 0.2-2 ng/ml, (5) age ≥ 35 years, and 6() willing to sign an informed consent. Three-hundred and thirty-two (332) patients were enrolled between March 2016 and June 2017; mean/median PSA was 0.84/0.61 ng/ml, 97.9% (325/332) of patients received radical prostatectomy and 2.1% (7/332) radiotherapy. Different patterns of BCR were identified by referent physicians as follows: (a) persisting detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy in 13.5% (45/332) of patients (subgroup 1), (b) first-time PSA failure after radical therapy in 44.9% (149/332) (subgroup 2), and (c) PSA increase after salvage or hormonal therapy in 41.6% (138/332) (subgroup 3). RESULTS: Primary objective: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate was 53.6% (CI 95% 48.1%-59.1%). In a patient-based analysis, disease confined to pelvis (prostate bed and/or lymph-nodes) was detected in 24.7% of cases (82/332). The presence of at least one distant lesion was observed in 28.9% of cases (96/332). The detection rate in different subgroups was: subgroup 1 = 64.5%, subgroup 2 = 45.6%, and subgroup-3 = 58.7%. Secondary objectives: 1) PSA (p = 0.041) and PSAdt (p = 0.001) showed association with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate, and 2) correlative imaging was available in 73.2% of patients (243/332). When 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was positive, correlative imaging resulted negative in 83% of cases (108/130). 3) The calculated PPV was 96.2%. CONCLUSION: Our data confirmed the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for detecting local vs systemic disease in PCa patients presenting PSA failure after radical therapy. Furthermore, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate is different depending on the clinical stage of BCR, and this information should be taken into consideration by referring physicians.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was the evaluation of Gallium 68 (68Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) detection rate, for identifying the site of prostate cancer (PCa) relapse (local vs systemic), stratifying the population according to different clinical stages of biochemical recurrence (BCR). Secondary aims were: 1) to evaluate the association of clinical/pathologic features and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate, 2) to compare 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with other imaging procedures, and 3) to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) in a per-patient analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This population was enrolled through a prospective, open label, single-center trial performed at the Nuclear Medicine of the University Hospital of Bologna (Eudract: 2015-004589-27 OsSC). The inclusion criteria were: (1) proven PCa, (2) surgery or radiotherapy as definitive therapy, (3) proven BCR, (4) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 0.2-2 ng/ml, (5) age ≥ 35 years, and 6() willing to sign an informed consent. Three-hundred and thirty-two (332) patients were enrolled between March 2016 and June 2017; mean/median PSA was 0.84/0.61 ng/ml, 97.9% (325/332) of patients received radical prostatectomy and 2.1% (7/332) radiotherapy. Different patterns of BCR were identified by referent physicians as follows: (a) persisting detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy in 13.5% (45/332) of patients (subgroup 1), (b) first-time PSA failure after radical therapy in 44.9% (149/332) (subgroup 2), and (c) PSA increase after salvage or hormonal therapy in 41.6% (138/332) (subgroup 3). RESULTS: Primary objective: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate was 53.6% (CI 95% 48.1%-59.1%). In a patient-based analysis, disease confined to pelvis (prostate bed and/or lymph-nodes) was detected in 24.7% of cases (82/332). The presence of at least one distant lesion was observed in 28.9% of cases (96/332). The detection rate in different subgroups was: subgroup 1 = 64.5%, subgroup 2 = 45.6%, and subgroup-3 = 58.7%. Secondary objectives: 1) PSA (p = 0.041) and PSAdt (p = 0.001) showed association with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate, and 2) correlative imaging was available in 73.2% of patients (243/332). When 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was positive, correlative imaging resulted negative in 83% of cases (108/130). 3) The calculated PPV was 96.2%. CONCLUSION: Our data confirmed the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for detecting local vs systemic disease in PCa patients presenting PSA failure after radical therapy. Furthermore, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate is different depending on the clinical stage of BCR, and this information should be taken into consideration by referring physicians.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biochemical recurrence; First biochemical recurrence; PSMA PET/CT; PSMA prospective; PSMA prostate; Prostate cancer
Authors: Jeremie Calais; Johannes Czernin; Minsong Cao; Amar U Kishan; John V Hegde; Narek Shaverdian; Kiri Sandler; Fang-I Chu; Chris R King; Michael L Steinberg; Isabel Rauscher; Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Thorsten Poeppel; Philipp Hetkamp; Francesco Ceci; Ken Herrmann; Wolfgang P Fendler; Matthias Eiber; Nicholas G Nickols Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Isabel Rauscher; Charlotte Düwel; Bernhard Haller; Christoph Rischpler; Matthias M Heck; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger; Tobias Maurer; Matthias Eiber Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Paul J Roach; Roslyn Francis; Louise Emmett; Edward Hsiao; Andrew Kneebone; George Hruby; Thomas Eade; Quoc A Nguyen; Benjamin D Thompson; Thomas Cusick; Michael McCarthy; Colin Tang; Bao Ho; Philip D Stricker; Andrew M Scott Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Masood A Khan; H Ballentine Carter; Jonathan I Epstein; Michael C Miller; Patricia Landis; Patrick W Walsh; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Piet Ost; Alberto Bossi; Karel Decaestecker; Gert De Meerleer; Gianluca Giannarini; R Jeffrey Karnes; Mack Roach; Alberto Briganti Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Tim Holland-Letz; Frederik L Giesel; Clemens Kratochwil; Walter Mier; Sabine Haufe; Nils Debus; Matthias Eder; Michael Eisenhut; Martin Schäfer; Oliver Neels; Markus Hohenfellner; Klaus Kopka; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Francesco Ceci; Lorenzo Bianchi; Marco Borghesi; Giulia Polverari; Andrea Farolfi; Alberto Briganti; Riccardo Schiavina; Eugenio Brunocilla; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Francesco Ceci; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Louise Emmett; Judit A Adam; Jamshed Bomanji; Johannes Czernin; Matthias Eiber; Uwe Haberkorn; Michael S Hofman; Thomas A Hope; Rakesh Kumar; Steven P Rowe; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Stefano Fanti; Ken Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Steven P Rowe; Scott P Campbell; Margarita Mana-Ay; Zsolt Szabo; Mohamad E Allaf; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Pomper; Ashley E Ross; Michael A Gorin Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Esther Mena; Peter C Black; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Michael Gorin; Mohamad Allaf; Peter Choyke Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.226