Literature DB >> 30349970

What makes a landmark effective in adolescent and adult rats? Sex and age differences in a navigation task.

V D Chamizo1, M N Torres2, C A Rodríguez2, N J Mackintosh3.   

Abstract

In three experiments, rats of different ages were trained in a circular pool to find a hidden platform whose location was defined in terms of a single landmark, a cylinder outside the pool. Following training, two main components of the landmark, its shape and pattern, were tested individually. Experiment 1 was performed by adolescent and adult rats (Exp. 1a, males; Exp. 1b, females). Adult rats always learned faster than the adolescent animals. On test trials, interesting tendencies were found-mainly, one favoring males on the shape test trial, and another favoring females on the pattern test trial. Experiment 2 was conducted only with adolescent rats, and these males and females did not differ when learning the task. However, on test trials the males learned more about the landmark shape component than about the landmark pattern component, while the females learned equally about the two components of the landmark. Finally, Experiment 3 was conducted only with adult rats, and again the males and females did not differ when learning the task. However, on test trials the males learned equally about the two components of the landmark (shape and pattern), but the females learned more about the landmark pattern component than about the landmark shape component. This set of experiments supports the claim that male and female rats can learn rather different things about a landmark that signals the location of the platform, with age being a critical variable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence and adulthood; Landmark learning; Rats; Sex differences; Shape and pattern components

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30349970     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-018-0364-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  26 in total

1.  Gender differences in Morris water maze performance depend on task parameters.

Authors:  R L Roof; D G Stein
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1999 Dec 1-15

Review 2.  The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model.

Authors:  M E Le Pelley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-07

3.  Do hormonal changes that appear at the onset of puberty determine the strategies used by female rats when solving a navigation task?

Authors:  Clara A Rodríguez; V D Chamizo; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Reconciling the influence of predictiveness and uncertainty on stimulus salience: a model of attention in associative learning.

Authors:  Guillem R Esber; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sexually dimorphic cognitive style in rats emerges after puberty.

Authors:  L Kanit; D Taskiran; O A Yilmaz; B Balkan; S Demirgören; J J Furedy; S Pögün
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task.

Authors:  N J Sandstrom; J Kaufman; S A Huettel
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1998-04

7.  Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies?

Authors:  Deborah M Saucier; Sheryl M Green; Jennifer Leason; Alastair MacFadden; Scott Bell; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Mental rotation in human infants: a sex difference.

Authors:  David S Moore; Scott P Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

9.  The development and stability of estrogen-modulated spatial navigation strategies in female rats.

Authors:  Kristen E Pleil; Christina L Williams
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Hierarchical use of cues in the missing object recognition task by rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Marium Arain; Jerome Cohen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.