| Literature DB >> 30347640 |
Michael J LaMonte1, Robert J Genco2, Wei Zheng3, Daniel I McSkimming4, Christopher A Andrews5, Kathleen M Hovey6, Lu Li7, Yijun Sun8, Michael J Buck9, Amy E Millen10, Karen L Falkner11, Jean Wactawski-Wende12.
Abstract
Aging invokes physiological changes, such as immunosenescence and inflammation, that could increase host susceptibility to oral microbiome shifts that enable periodontitis progression in later life. At present, there is a dearth of studies specifically evaluating the oral microbiome and periodontitis in older adults. We used high-throughput untargeted sequencing methods and functional metagenomic analyses to assess and compare the subgingival biofilm of postmenopausal women (mean age 71 years) according to periodontitis status. Subgingival plaque samples were obtained from 15 postmenopausal women with no periodontitis, and from 15 women with severe periodontitis, determined by probing measures. The 16S rRNA gene (V1⁻V3 region) was sequenced on the 454 FLX platform. The PICRUSt technique was used to provide information on what the potential functional characteristics of microbiota might be in healthy, compared with diseased, periodontium. The subgingival microbiome associated with periodontitis showed clear differences to that associated with health. Of the 464 species identified, 22.8% had elevated abundance in disease, while only 6.3% had elevated abundance in health. Among the 12 most prevalent organisms in periodontitis, one-half have previously been recognized as periodontal pathogens by other investigators. The subgingival microbiome in periodontitis contained genes that could code for specific activities, including microbial mobility, synthesis of endotoxin, and proteolytic degradation. The healthy microbiome included genes that could code for sustaining microbial life, including encoding for transporters, glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, the Krebs cycle, and protein kinases. In the present study on postmenopausal women, aged 60 and older, the subgingival microbiome differed in composition and potential function between those with and without periodontitis. Studies of functional gene expression, such as transcriptomics, are needed to definitively identify the molecules carrying out functions associated with pathogenic subgingival complexes. This, in turn, could lead to identification of targets for enhanced management of periodontitis and, possibly, other diseases, in later life.Entities:
Keywords: aging; menopause; microbiome; periodontal disease; women
Year: 2018 PMID: 30347640 PMCID: PMC6313419 DOI: 10.3390/dj6040058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dent J (Basel) ISSN: 2304-6767
Participant characteristics for the overall study group and according to periodontal disease status. Data are mean ± SD, or N (%).
| Characteristic | Overall | Periodontal Disease Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | None | Severe |
| N | 30 | 15 | 15 |
| Age (years) | 70.5 ± 7.6 | 67.7 ± 7.3 | 73.2 ± 7.1 |
| BMI * (kg/m2) | 25.6 ± 4.8 | 27.3 ± 5.4 | 23.9 ± 3.6 |
| Caucasian | 30 (100.0) | 15 (100.0) | 15 (100.0) |
| Education | - | - | - |
| High school | 8 (26.7) | 3 (20.0) | 5 (33.3) |
| College | 12 (40.0) | 6 (40.0) | 4 (26.7) |
| Postgraduate | 10 (33.3) | 6 (40.0) | 4 (26.7) |
| Smoking | - | - | - |
| Never | 14 (46.7) | 8 (53.3) | 6 (40.0) |
| Former | 16 (53.3) | 7 (46.7) | 9 (60.0) |
| Current | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hormone therapy use | - | - | - |
| Never | 11 (36.7) | 5 (33.3) | 6 (40.0) |
| Former | 12 (40.0) | 6 (40.0) | 6 (40.0) |
| Current | 7 (23.3) | 4 (26.7) | 3 (20.0) |
| History of diagnosed treated diabetes | 1 (3.3) | 0 | 1 (6.7) |
| No. teeth present | 23.9 ± 3.3 | 25.7 ± 2.4 | 22.1 ± 3.1 |
| Whole-mouth PD ** (mm) | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 0.7 |
| Whole-mouth CAL *** (mm) | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.8 |
| Sites bleeding on probing (%) | 17.0 ± 19.0 | 9.0 ± 6.0 | 24.0 ± 25.0 |
* BMI, body mass index; ** PD, pocket depth; *** CAL, clinical attachment level.
Figure 1Genus and species level microbial differences between women with and without periodontal disease. (a) Panel A. Green = species/genus had significantly higher relative abundance in health; Red = species/genus had significantly higher relative abundance in disease. Disease (red) and health (green) refer to women with and without periodontal disease, respectively; (b) Panel B. Genera with an overall relative abundance ≥0.2%, and an adjusted p ≤ 0.05, ordered by the difference of relative abundance. Red and green bars are for women with and without periodontal disease, respectively; (c) Panel C. Species with an overall relative abundance ≥0.2% and an adjusted p ≤ 0.05, ordered by the difference of relative abundance. Red and green bars are for women with and without periodontal disease, respectively.
Figure 2Alpha-diversity and beta-diversity analyses. Alpha-diversity analysis shown in Panels a–c; Beta-diversity in Panels D and E. The rarefaction curve (Panel A) shows a greater number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) are observed in women with, compared to without periodontal disease. Species richness (Panel B) was greater in women with, than without periodontal disease. No difference in species evenness (Panel C) was observed. (a) Panel A. Rarefaction curve; (b) Panel B. Species richness plot; (c) Panel C. Species evenness plot; (d) Panel D. Unweighted UniFrac distance; (e) Panel E. Weighted UniFrac distance.
Figure 3Beta-diversity analysis showing the top 12 bacterial species associated with periodontal disease and with no periodontal disease. The sizes of the datapoints are scaled to reflect the relative abundance of species in each sample. Red and green dots refer to women with and without periodontal disease, respectively. (a) Panel A. Bacterial species predominantly associated with periodontal disease; (b) Panel B. Bacterial species predominantly associated with no periodontal disease.
Figure 4Minimum entropy decomposition (MED) analysis of 9 OTUs with distinct nodes. Examples of subgingival bacteria for which differences in both the number and distribution of MED nodes (e.g., potential subspecies) are seen in periodontal health versus disease.
Figure 5Minimum entropy decomposition (MED) analysis of 5 OTUs with similar nodes. Examples of subgingival bacteria for which there are limited or no differences in the number and distribution of MED nodes (e.g., potential subspecies) in periodontal health versus disease.
Figure 6Functional pathways attributed to subgingival biofilm communities. Green bars (HC) are for women with healthy periodontium, Red bars (CP) for women with periodontal disease. (a) Panel A. Functional attributes for samples taken from the upper arch; (b) Panel B. Functional attributes for samples taken from the lower arch.