Arseny A Sokolov1,2,3, Petr Grivaz1, Riley Bove4,5. 1. Neuroscape@NeuroTech Platform, Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. 2. Service de Neurologie, Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. 3. Neuroscape Center, Weill Institute for the Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Neuroscape Center, Weill Institute for the Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. riley.bove@ucsf.edu. 5. Weill Institute for the Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA, USA. riley.bove@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article highlights recent progress in research on treatment and neurorehabilitation of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) including pharmacological interventions, physical exercise, and neuropsychological rehabilitation, both in conventional and technology-assisted settings. RECENT FINDINGS: The most consistent evidence in terms of improvement or preservation of circumscribed cognitive scores in MS patients comes from moderately sampled randomized clinical trials on multimodal approaches that combine conventional or computerized neuropsychological training with psychoeducation or cognitive behavioral therapy. Disease-modifying treatments also appear to have beneficial effects in preventing or attenuating cognitive decline, whereas there is little evidence for agents such as donepezil or stimulants. Finally, physical exercise may yield some cognitive improvement in MS patients. Despite substantial and often promising research efforts, there is a lack of validated and widely accepted clinical procedures for cognitive neurorehabilitation in MS. Development of such approaches will require collaborative efforts towards the design of interventions that are fundamentally inspired by cognitive neuroscience, potentially guided by neuroimaging, and composed of conventional neuropsychological training and cognitive behavioral therapy as well as physical exercise and therapeutic video games. Subsequently, large-scale validation will be needed with meaningful outcome measures reflecting transfer to everyday cognitive function and maintenance of training effects.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article highlights recent progress in research on treatment and neurorehabilitation of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) including pharmacological interventions, physical exercise, and neuropsychological rehabilitation, both in conventional and technology-assisted settings. RECENT FINDINGS: The most consistent evidence in terms of improvement or preservation of circumscribed cognitive scores in MSpatients comes from moderately sampled randomized clinical trials on multimodal approaches that combine conventional or computerized neuropsychological training with psychoeducation or cognitive behavioral therapy. Disease-modifying treatments also appear to have beneficial effects in preventing or attenuating cognitive decline, whereas there is little evidence for agents such as donepezil or stimulants. Finally, physical exercise may yield some cognitive improvement in MSpatients. Despite substantial and often promising research efforts, there is a lack of validated and widely accepted clinical procedures for cognitive neurorehabilitation in MS. Development of such approaches will require collaborative efforts towards the design of interventions that are fundamentally inspired by cognitive neuroscience, potentially guided by neuroimaging, and composed of conventional neuropsychological training and cognitive behavioral therapy as well as physical exercise and therapeutic video games. Subsequently, large-scale validation will be needed with meaningful outcome measures reflecting transfer to everyday cognitive function and maintenance of training effects.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cerebellum; Cognition; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis; Neurotechnology; Rehabilitation; Video games
Authors: Christian Enzinger; Daniela Pinter; Maria A Rocca; John De Luca; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Bertrand Audoin; Massimo Filippi Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Cyrus K Foroughi; Samuel S Monfort; Martin Paczynski; Patrick E McKnight; P M Greenwood Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Francesco Patti; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Maria Pia Amato; Maria Trojano; Stefano Bastianello; Maria Rosalia Tola; Salvatore Cottone; Andrea Plant; Orietta Picconi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dawn W Langdon; Davorka Tomic; Iris-Katharina Penner; Pasquale Calabrese; Gary Cutter; Dieter A Häring; Frank Dahlke; Ludwig Kappos Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-10-12 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Philipp M Keune; Sascha Hansen; Torsten Sauder; Sonja Jaruszowic; Christina Kehm; Jana Keune; Emily Weber; Michael Schönenberg; Patrick Oschmann Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Dennis A M van Gorp; Karin van der Hiele; Marco A P Heerings; Peter J Jongen; Jac J L van der Klink; Michiel F Reneman; Edo P J Arnoldus; Ernesto A C Beenakker; Jeroen J J van Eijk; Stephan T F M Frequin; Koen de Gans; Elske Hoitsma; Jop P Mostert; Wim I M Verhagen; Désirée Zemel; Leo H Visser; Huub A M Middelkoop Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Judith Jantine Willemijn van Beek; Erwin Everardus Henri van Wegen; Marc Berend Rietberg; Thomas Nyffeler; Stephan Bohlhalter; Christian Philipp Kamm; Tobias Nef; Tim Vanbellingen Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 4.773